About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents
 
advertisement


Subscriptions
Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
     RTN
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By


Product Reviews
Partner Sites

machinecontrolonline 


lbszone.com

GISuser.com

GeoJobs.biz

GeoLearn

 

Spatial Media LLC properties

Associates

ASPRS

newsnow 

Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

How Precise is OPUS? - Part 1: Experimental Results Print E-mail
Written by Richard Snay, Kevin Choi, Gerald Mader, Charles Schwarz, Tomás Soler and Neil Weston   
Friday, 01 July 2011

A 628Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images and necessary for the equations—is available by clicking HERE

NOAA's National Geodetic Survey (NGS) introduced its Online Positioning User Service (OPUS) in 2001 as a means to provide both easy and accurate access to the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS). Surveyors and others can submit dual frequency GPS data to the OPUS web page www.geodesy.noaa.gov/OPUS and receive an email containing positional coordinates, with pertinent error estimates, for the location where their data were collected, often within minutes. OPUS computes these coordinates by processing the user-submitted data with corresponding GPS data from the U.S. Continuously Operating Reference Station (CORS) network and/or the International GNSS Service (IGS) network. OPUS-computed coordinates are thus consistent with NGS-published coordinates for the stations contained in the combined CORS/IGS network, and consequently they are consistent with the NSRS. By incorporating OPUS-computed coordinates into their survey work, geospatial professionals and others can be highly confident that their work is consistent with other survey work that has been tied to the NSRS.

This article is the first of three that will explore with what precision OPUS can compute positional coordinates. In this article, precision is measured by processing GPS data from each of several CORS/IGS stations and comparing the OPUS-generated coordinates with corresponding NGS-published coordinates where the published coordinates have been independently determined from many days worth of GPS data. The second and third articles will appear in subsequent issues of this magazine.

A limiting condition of the original OPUS utility is that its users must submit at least two hours of dual frequency GPS carrier phase data to be reasonably confident that OPUS will correctly resolve the integer ambiguities associated with these data. When these ambiguities are correctly resolved, OPUS-computed coordinates will be precise to a few centimeters. Otherwise, the coordinates might be precise to a few decimeters. To overcome the need for two hours of data, NGS developed the OPUS-RS utility, where "RS" stands for rapid static. Consequently, the original OPUS utility was renamed OPUS-S where "S" stands for static. OPUS-RS was designed so that users may submit as little as 15 minutes of dual frequency GPS data. OPUS-RS uses a data processing engine that differs significantly from that utilized in OPUS-S. The OPUS-RS processing engine was designed by researchers at the Ohio State University with support from NGS. NGS then refined the original design and developed appropriate software for a production environment. OPUS-RS was released for public use in 2007.

The primary difference between the OPUS-RS processing engine and the OPUS-S processing engine relates to how they respectively handle the travel-time delays caused by atmospheric refraction and experienced by a GPS signal during its journey from a satellite to the user's receiver, hereafter called the rover. In the case of OPUS-RS, the processing engine uses at least one hour of GPS data, overlapping in time with the user's observing session, from at least three and as many as nine CORS/IGS stations, each located within 250 km of the rover, to determine the atmospheric delays experienced at these CORS/IGS stations during the user's observing session. That is, OPUS-RS will use an hour's worth of CORS/IGS data even if the user's observing session is only 15 minutes long. (For longer observing sessions, OPUS-RS will always use at least as long a time span of data from the CORS/IGS stations.) The atmospheric delays include those caused by free electrons residing in the upper atmosphere as well as the delays caused by the distribution of molecules residing in the neutral atmosphere. The delays experienced at the CORS/IGS stations can be determined rather precisely because the computational process constrains the coordinates of these stations to values that have been previously determined from rigorous analysis involving many days, if not years, of data. Then OPUS-RS interpolates (or extrapolates) the computed atmospheric delays at the selected CORS/IGS stations to estimate corresponding delays at the rover. Finally, OPUS-RS constrains the atmospheric delays at the rover to their interpolated/extrapolated values when it computes the rover's coordinates. These constraints are weighted in inverse proportion to their estimated variance.

In the case of OPUS-S, the processing engine computes all atmospheric delays (for the rover as well as the selected CORS/IGS stations) simultaneously while it is computing the rover's coordinates. OPUS-S does not use any GPS data from the CORS/IGS network other than that collected during the user's observing session. Nor does OPUS-S assume that the delays, experienced at the rover, may be approximated by interpolating (or extrapolating) corresponding delays at nearby CORS/IGS sites. As described below, the use of interpolation/extrapolation not only affects how little data the user can submit, it also affects how precise the resulting coordinates will be.

Over the last decade, NGS researchers empirically determined that the standard deviations of coordinates computed with OPUS-S depends primarily on the duration of the user's observing session. In particular, for observing sessions spanning at least three hours, the standard deviation h in each horizontal dimension (north-south or east-west) is well approximated by the equation

see PDF for equation

where T denotes the duration of the observing session in hours. Correspondingly, the standard deviation v in the vertical dimension (ellipsoid height) is well approximated by the equation

see PDF for equation

Thus for T = 4 hours, h = 0.5 cm and v = 1.85 cm. Figure 1 illustrates these relationships along with standard deviations that are obtainable with OPUS-RS as discussed later in this article.

NGS's studies showed that the precision of coordinates computed by OPUS-S do not depend significantly on the geometry of the CORS/IGS stations, nor on the distances from the rover to the various CORS/IGS stations (until distances exceed 1,000 km). OPUS-RS precision, however, does depend significantly on these two factors because OPUS-RS relies on interpolating/extrapolating atmospheric delays from the CORS/IGS stations to the rover. To measure this dependence, NGS personnel considered two quantities: (1) the interpolative dilution of precision (IDOP) for characterizing the geometry of CORS/IGS stations used in the OPUSRS solution and (2) the root mean square distance (RMSD) for characterizing the collection of distances between the rover and the CORS/IGS stations used in the OPUS-RS solution.

As may be expected, OPUS-RS can better estimate atmospheric delays from the CORS/IGS stations to the rover through interpolation when the nearby CORS/IGS stations surround the rover on all sides, rather than through extrapolation if the nearby CORS/IGS stations are all located within a narrow wedge formed by two lines emanating outward from the rover, for example, when all of the nearby CORS/IGS sites are located both south and east of the rover. In particular, OPUS-RS results in coastal areas often suffer in precision due to the poor station geometry realized when the nearby CORS/IGS stations are all located landward of the rover. IDOP is a unitless quantity that provides a rigorous numerical measure for this concept. Figure 2 demonstrates how IDOP varies as a function of the rover's location for the specific case when there are only four CORS/ IGS stations located within 250 km of the rover and these four stations form the corners of a square. IDOP should not be confused with the well-known, unitless quantity called the geometric dilution of precision (GDOP); nor should IDOP be confused with measures related to GDOP such as PDOP, HDOP, VDOP, TDOP, etc. GDOP and its related measures quantify the geometry of the collection of GPS satellites visible from the rover, whereas IDOP quantifies the geometry of the CORS/IGS stations (being used by OPUS-RS) relative to the rover.

Also as may be expected, the closer the CORS/IGS stations are to the rover, the better OPUS-RS can interpolate/ extrapolate atmospheric delays from the CORS/IGS stations to the rover. If n denotes the number of CORS/IGS stations involved in an OPUS-RS solution and di denotes the distance from the rover to the ith CORS/IGS station (for i = 1,2,...,n), then

see PDF for equation

To determine how the precision of OPUS-RS depends on IDOP and RMSD, NGS performed thousands of OPUS-RS solutions for 15-minute observing sessions. For a particular solution, the experiment used data from a selected CORS/IGS station as the rover's data. The difference between the coordinates computed with OPUS-RS and the corresponding coordinates previously published by NGS (and based on many days of GPS data) supplied a measure of the solution's precision. However, any errors in the previously published coordinates themselves also would have contributed to the overall disagreement, so such differences will become smaller when more accurate CORS/IGS coordinates become available in the future. This process was repeated several times so as to use all CORS located in the contiguous United States as the rover and use numerous data sets collectively spanning the period from July 2007 to April 2008. The experiment was also repeated for observing sessions of one-hour duration and again for observing sessions of four-hour duration.

Figure 3 illustrates some of the results for the specific case when IDOP = 0.45. As revealed by this figure, coordinates computed with OPUS-RS using one hour of rover data are significantly more precise than those computed using 15 minutes of rover data, while those computed using four hours of rover data are only marginally more precise than those computed using one hour of rover data. Also, the experiments indicate that­—for any given values for the three variables: IDOP, RMSD, and the duration of the observing session­—the standard deviation of OPUS-RS in the vertical dimension (ellipsoid height) is between 2.8 and 4.0 times larger than the corresponding standard deviation in each horizontal dimension (north-south or east-west). This result agrees well with results (published in 2001) using OPUS-S where vertical standard deviations are approximately 3.7 times larger than corresponding horizontal standard deviations as revealed by the two equations given earlier in this article which involve these standard deviations.

The second and third articles will further discuss the precision of coordinates computed with OPUS-S or OPUS-RS. Also, more detailed information about OPUS and its precision may be found in OPUS-related articles available on the Web at www.geodesy.noaa.gov/CORS/Articles/ and in a collection of scientific papers written by several authors and published by the American Society of Civil Engineers under the title, CORS and OPUS for Engineers: Tools for Surveying and Mapping Applications.

Richard Snay served as an NGS scientist from 1974 to 2010. Rich managed the U.S. CORS program from 1998 to 2007, and he supervised the NGS Spatial Reference System Division from 2003 to 2010.

Kevin Choi has served as an NGS scientist since 2009. Kevin currently maintains the OPUS-RS utility, and he developed interactive web-based maps that allow users to view the precision of OPUS-RS as a function of geographic location.

Gerald Mader has served as an NGS scientist since 1983. Gerry has supervised the NGS Geosciences Research Division since 1996, and he has been the leading architect of all things OPUS.

Charles Schwarz served as an NGS scientist from 1974 to 1990. Charlie supervised the NGS Systems Development Division from 1990 to 2005. He was the lead systems analyst involved in developing and implementing OPUS-RS.

Tomás Soler has served as an NGS scientist since 1979. Tom supervised the NGS GPS Branch from 1990 to 2003. He currently serves as Chief Technical Officer in the NGS Spatial Reference System Division, and he conducted most of the experiments described in this article.

Neil Weston has served as an NGS scientist since 1994. Neil has supervised the NGS Spatial Reference System Division since 2010, and he has been the "go to" person for OPUS since its inception.

A 628Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images and necessary for the equations—is available by clicking HERE

 
< Prev   Next >

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Editorial 
Thought Leader: Land is Too Important to Be Left to Land Specialists
A while back I was searching the Internet for an old treatise on land titles. A Google query yielded a book published in 1914. The author was Charles Claudius Kagey and the book was titled "Land Survey and Land Titles, a book for boys and girls, a reference volume for property owners, a text ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Wacker vs. Price - Irony in Sevenfold
This month's case takes us to Phoenix, Arizona in 1950. The Arizona Supreme Court went all guns-a-blazin' in Wacker vs. Price (216 P.2d 707 (Ariz. 1950)). Maybe it's just me, but I'm sensing plenty of irony and have taken license to point it out along the way. I like what the Court did with this case ....
Read the Article
Allen E. Cheves 
Around the Bend - A Visit to Carlson Software
The Ohio River is one of America's greatest, running near 1,000 miles between Pittsburgh and the Mighty Mississippi. Much of the coal and other products that fueled our nation's industrial expansion flowed between the shores of this maritime ....
Read the Article
Lee Lovell, PS 
Surveying & Mapping Economics Part 3 - Customers & Services
This article continues an inquiry into the economic conditions of the Surveying and Mapping industry (NAICS 541370) using data from the U.S. Census Bureau. This time we will look at customers and services. The data comes from the Economic Census conducted every 5 years on American ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
True Elevation: Black Elk Peak
Black Elk Peak, located in the Black Hills region of South Dakota, is the state's highest natural point. It is frequently referred to as the highest summit in the United States east of the Rocky Mountains. Two other peaks, Guadalupe Peak in Texas and ....
Read the Article
Larry Trojak 
Bringing The Goods - Mobile Scanning an Integral Component
When Jim Smith, Jerrad Burns and Charlie Patton left the Memphis division of a major construction company in 2015, they took with them the knowledge of how to get even the most complex jobs done and what equipment could best serve them in making that happen. So when they joined West ....
Read the Article
 
Lee Lovell, PS 
Test Yourself 41: Integers, Integers, and Integers
ABF is a 5:12:13 triangle, ACF is a 48:55:73 triangle, ADF is a 3:4:5 triangle, and AEF is a 7:24:25 triangle, all with integer sides and inscribed in a semi-circle. What are the lengths of BC, CD, and DE? ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Sunset or Sunrise?
While we often think of legislated government programs as static, they do change over time. Such evolution and opportunity for transformation are part of the dialogue in reauthorizing these programs. Every so many years there is a sunset on each government program, and this September is the ....
Read the Article
 

deliciousrssnewsletterlinkedinfacebooktwitter

Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
please
contact Amerisurv


Google
 
AMERISURV TOP NEWS

JAVAD Intros
Spoofer Buster

GOT NEWS? Send To
press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content

Sponsor


News Feeds

 
Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps
Careers

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.

 

Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 

twitter

 




The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
905 W 7th St #331
Frederick MD 21701
301-620-0784
301-695-1538 - fax