About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents

Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By

Product Reviews
Partner Sites







Spatial Media LLC properties




Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

Geodetic Surveyor Certification and/or Professional Registration Print E-mail
Written by Herbert W. Stoughton, Ph.D., P.E., P.L.S., C.P.   
Friday, 15 April 2011

Geodetic Surveyor Certification and/or Professional Registration

Herbert W. Stoughton, Geodetic Engineer


Geodesy: The science which treats mathematically the figure, form, and size of the earth.

Geodetic Surveying: Is that branch of surveying which takes into account the size and shape of the earth. Geodetic surveying addresses the three dimensional aspects of the world (curvature of the earth) and four dimensional aspects of the points in the space-time continuum. Sophisticated instrumentation and procedures are employed in order to attain specific accuracies and precisions. Also, advanced and sophisticated computing techniques are required. Geodetic surveying may require knowledge and training in aspects of physical, engineering, and geophysical sciences in order to complete assignments.

The Problem

            Geodetic surveying requires an in depth knowledge of topics in the subjects of mathematics; statistics; engineering, geophysical and physical sciences; metrology; and surveying. As more precise and accurate surveys are required, physical phenomena that have been disregarded in plane surveying work can significantly impact survey observations and data. Geodetic survey data are at least one order of magnitude more precise. Observing and data reduction procedures are more sophisticated and complex, and require more exacting attention to details. An in depth knowledge and understanding of systematic errors, their detection and identification, and their removal from the data are paramount for a broad spectrum of engineering, geophysical, political, navigational, legal, commercial, and national defense programs requiring the information. In order to address these programs' needs, the geodetic surveyor must have excellent communication skills in order to be able to converse with the end-user and understand the latter's needs. A poorly designed geodetic survey could provide no information or misinformation.

            Failure to understand and apply geodetic surveying correctly in engineering projects has resulted in major misalignments in highway and tunnel construction; gross errors in water line and sewer construction; errors in building's structural layout; incorrect building and dam deformation information; and invalid subsidence studies. In these instances, the problems were caused by faulty survey procedures, data reduction, data adjustment, or post processing analysis. The failure to comprehend the environmental effects on survey observations and recognize their contributions to final data integrity causes serious problems.

            One of the most critical technological problems which has continuously plagued geodetic surveying has been the lack of understanding about datums and their physical and geometrical interrelationships. There are very few definitive writings on the subject, and these have little circulation. Because of the recent impact that GPS surveying has on surveying and mapping, the subject of datum transformations must be addressed.

Scope of Technical Practice

            The scope of geodetic surveying is limited only by the problem assignment. Although there is a significant diversity in geodetic surveying, a number of the activities and functions are broadly applicable. Geodetic surveying generally is associated with highly accurate and precise surveying methodology to establish horizontal and vertical geodetic networks. While this philosophy is valid, geodetic surveying is the art and practice of developing survey control sufficiently accurate and precise to accommodate and address the requirements for the project or program.

            Technical practice requires defining the problem, designing the survey, executing the data collection, reducing and adjusting the observations, and analyzing and publishing the results. The practitioner may be proficient in one or more of these areas, but should have familiarity with the goals and objectives of all phases of a geodetic survey.

            If we list the various geodetic survey types in order of use and importance, we shall discover a preponderance of the effort is directed to about four types of surveys, and less than twenty percent of the total effort being expended on the remainder. The four types are horizontal control (conventional triangulation, trilateration, and traverse); vertical control (conventional differential and trigonometrical leveling, geometric and geopotential heighting), Global Positioning System (GPS), and gravimetry. Many individuals would argue that gravimetry is not a major effort, but it must be remembered that approximately eighty percent of all gravimetric surveys are performed for geophysical exploration, and the remainder of the surveys support Department of Defense weapon systems, inertial navigation systems, and national geodetic vertical networks.

            The “smaller” activities include astronomic azimuth determination (stellar, solar, and gyroscopic/inertial), astronomic positioning, Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), geomagnetic mapping (high accuracy mapping), analytical photogrammetry, and miscellaneous space techniques and campaigns (i.e. lunar laser ranging).

Personnel Requirements - Education

            An individual who is a geodesist or geodetic surveyor requires post secondary education and suitable experience. As a starting point of reference, let us accept the U.S. Office of Personnel Management's minimum education criteria for entry-level geodesist - thirty (30) semester hours or forty-five (45) quarter hours of post secondary education in mathematics (analytical geometry, differential and integral calculus, statistics, etc.); physical, engineering, and geophysical sciences; and surveying (or surveying related subjects). These subjects must be taken and passed at a regionally or nationally accredited academic institution, or through the SAT Advance Placement examination, or other recognized and accepted testing authority. If courses are completed through correspondence, then criteria must be written which stipulate minimum qualifications by the offering institution. This latter requirement is intended to eliminate those "academic" institutions offering "bogus" degrees.

            In addition to the aforesaid academic course work, satisfactory short courses and seminars may be included to satisfy academic requirements. However, in order to accept such latter academic experience, the certifying organization must develop and implement a fair and impartial set of guide lines addressing minimum course content, contact hours, assignments, syllabus and course outline, instructor qualifications, and evaluation of student comprehension. This type of course should not be a “survey” course for nonprofessionals, but a technical presentation of bona fide information.

Personnel Requirements - Experience

            Minimum education qualifications are only an entry-level requirement. Good technical experience provides the knowledge that makes the professional. The committee evaluating the experience must address a subjective aspect of the certification/professional registration process. When an applicant submits experience, the evaluator must determine if the experience was: (1) professional and meaningful; (2) progressively more demanding; (3) the same experience for a short period of time repeated many times; and (4) indicates an increased technical/professional responsibilities with follow-on projects.

            The evaluation of experience shall not be a "bean counting" endeavor, but a meaningful interpretation of the applicant's efforts. When this philosophy is employed, then it is the applicant's responsibility to concisely and accurately describe the experience and demonstrate an understanding of the intent of imparting information to the evaluator. It also is the duty of any references to certify as to the accuracy and validity of the applicant’s described experience.


            The final evaluation of an applicant is a professional examination. This examination can only be prepared from the topics that are contained in an approved and published syllabus or “Scope of Technical Practice”. The distribution of topics shall be in the same proportion as the distribution of the sub disciplines discussed in “Scope of Technical Practice”. It is recommended that some questions be mandatory and the remainder be chosen from a group of questions (i.e. questions on conventional control surveying, GPS, and geodetic adjustments be mandatory).

            In order to have an impartial evaluation of the examinee, each question should require the examinee to: (1) define the problem; (2) identify the factors and conditions that could untowardly affect the solution; (3) offer a technically and economically feasible solution; and (4) defend the proposed approach. This format of examination means that it is graded/evaluated “subjectively” rather than “objectively”. This approach means time consuming evaluation which must be defendable from judicial litigation. This matter can be satisfactorily addressed. In general, the “objective” examination employs the ‘multiple choice’, short answer, true/false, and multiple choice examinee response. Since the evaluation of the applicant’s knowledge requires an in depth knowledge base, an objective examination does not provide a meaningful analysis tool.

            When an examination question is submitted, the question writer must submit a detailed solution (or multiple solutions/alternatives). These questions and answers are retained in the data base. When an examination grader discovers another logical and/or feasible approach (which does occur), this new solution is added to the file. The examination grader must realize that some questions do not have a single unique answer, but may have several reasonable answers. It is recommended that multiple graders be employed on each examination to mitigate any charges of bias in evaluating the submitted examination solution.

            The most important aspect about the examination is the educational value derived. A properly designed examination will provide information to the grader concerning the knowledge possessed by the examinee, and can provide insight into the examinee's ability to address technical problems and provide reasonable solutions. It is important that the examination provide both types of information.

Concluding Remarks

                        It is imperative that certification/professional registration not be identified as an alternative to the statutorily professional licensure/registration by states. Some states only address the practice of land surveying, but other states require professional licensure either as a professional land surveyor or a professional engineer to perform geodetic surveys. There is a definite place and role for geodetic certification/professional registration, but its acceptance is only viable if the sponsoring organization carefully defines the program and its implementation.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *

Herbert W. Stoughton, Ph.D., P.E., P.L.S., C.P.
Geodetic Engineer
5 February 2011

< Prev   Next >

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Marc Cheves, PS 
Editorial: A Great Year to be a Surveyor
Some magazines have what are called "theme" issues. That is, most of the content is focused on one particular subject. In my 22+ years of survey magazine publishing, my philosophy has always been to have a little bit of everything in each issue, thereby eliminating the possibility that ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Case Examinations: Halverson v. Deerwood Village
Whew! We really beat the snot out of Bryant v. Blevins and practical locations. Well this month we're back on new case that hit the Minnesota Supreme Court's docket in 1982. We've got the familiar gymnastics of jurisprudence featuring an extraordinary array of flying rope stretchers ...
Read the Article
Michel Philips 
Extreme Environment Surveying
A Franco-Chilean team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 rugged handheld for marine cave surveying, gathering data to classify the inaccessible northern half of Madre de Dios for UNESCO World Heritage. The team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 ....
Read the Article
Erik Dahlberg 
The Original Green Engineers
Sometimes, it's best just to leave things as you found them. That's the lesson shared by Dr. Richard Miksad and his students at the University of Virginia. As a result of studies covering nearly a decade, Miksad's teams have developed detailed ....
Read the Article
Dave Lindell, PS 
Test Yourself 49: No Dimensions
In square A-C-D-B with side S, C-E is tangent to the semicircle Q1 with diameter B-D. Q2 is the inscribed circle of A-C-E. The tangent to Q1 and Q2 meets the sides of the square at F and H and intersects C-E at t G. Q3 is the inscribed circle of C-G-H. What is the ratio of the radii of circles ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
Discovery on Grizzly Peak
When First Lieutenant Montgomery M. Macomb arrived in Carson City, Nevada, from Washington D.C., on July 28, 1878, his assigned survey crew from the 4th Artillery was waiting and ready for the new field season. At age 25, Macomb was the leader ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Fighting City Hall Over Land
Once upon a time (1989 to be exact) in a place not so far away from where I live, a man (Francis Galdo) bought a home across the street from a vacant parcel owned by the City of Philadelphia. That parcel, along with others, had been acquired by condemnation back in 1974 subsequent to a 1956 ....
Read the Article
Patrick C. Garner, PS 
Book Review: Boundary Retracement: Processes and Procedures
When I was in my mid-twenties and learning the honorable profession of land surveying, I was lucky to be guided by a mentor who would grab a book off his office shelf and say, "Every surveyor should have a copy of this!" The first example he waved at me was Davis, Foote and Kelly's Surveying ....
Read the Article


Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
contact Amerisurv


Geneq Introduces
Net20 Pro Receiver

press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content


News Feeds

Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.


Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 



The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
7820B Wormans Mill Road, #236
Frederick MD 21701
301-695-1538 - fax