About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents

Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By

Product Reviews
Partner Sites







Spatial Media LLC properties




Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

Survey Affidavit Of No Change Print E-mail
Written by Christopher M. Ernst, LS   
Sunday, 18 July 2010

A 843Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

Many professional land surveyors know all too well about the survey affidavit of no change, its negative effects on the surveying profession, and the impact it has on the public. If a land surveyor's primary duty is to safeguard life, health, property and promote the public welfare, then perhaps an extensive education/information campaign is needed to make consumers aware of the positive benefits of obtaining a current, professionally-prepared boundary survey as opposed to the negative effects of using a survey affidavit of no change. For the nominal amount of money a purchaser saves by not getting a survey, the seller has to incur a liability that they should not and most likely would not if they knew the potential financial risk they impose upon themselves by simply signing a document in order to expedite a property sale or to give a small cash savings incentive to the buyers.

One way to inform consumers is by relating individual scenarios or "horror stories" of actual survey affidavit stories gone awry. The following true story was taken from the case files of our small land surveying firm. (For reasons of privacy, names have been changed.).

We received a phone call from "Ms. Smith", who had recently bought a home and wanted to get a survey with property corner markers. She purchased the home about nine months earlier without a survey because her attorney wanted to help her out by getting the previous homeowners, "the Jones", to sign a survey affidavit of no change based on their old survey from about 25 years earlier. After all it sounded good-- Ms. Smith's lawyer supposedly saved her a couple of bucks and she could close on the property faster by skipping a whole new survey. Now the time had come for her to construct a fence. Since the town needed an up-to-date land survey for the permit to be issued, Ms. Smith hired our firm to do the work.

The survey turned out to be nothing out the ordinary; the property in question was in a well-monumented subdivision with no boundary issues. However, the survey revealed several problems that the grantors, their 25-year-old survey, and their signed survey affidavit of no change did not. There were two encroachments, a frame shed and an asphalt driveway with Belgian block curbing of 1 foot and 1.5 feet, respectively, on the adjacent property. Ms. Smith's attorney, while saving his client a "bundle" of cash (around 0.2% of the home price) on "an unnecessary document" commonly known as a survey, had in fact done his client a tremendous disservice. This attorney was now in a position to be taken to court himself along with Mr. and Mrs. Jones to absorb the costs of moving the encroachments off of the neighbor's property. The money that the lawyer had "saved" Ms. Smith on the new survey eventually had to be spent anyway. After getting the survey we prepared, Ms. Smith regretted not spending this money before she purchased this property, since our survey had brought to light issues that she now had to deal with.

Under the threat of litigation, the Joneses had to come back from their retirement paradise and purchase an easement from their old neighbors for the encroachments they failed to mention in the affidavit of no change they signed. Considering the time, aggravation and money the Joneses spent on the easement, it would have been substantially less expensive if they not only didn't sign the survey affidavit but if they had just paid for the new survey for Ms. Smith. Between the costs of the easement, additional lawyer's fees and travel expenses back to this state, the Joneses wound up spending in excess $ 4,000. Smith incurred costs that would have been equal to the cost of the survey initially, plus additional lawyer's fees in pressuring Jones to remedy the problem. At the time of the writing of this article Ms. Smith was also contemplating suing her attorney on that transaction, which would mean additional expenses in the hiring of another lawyer.

Some readers may say that this is just an extreme case and that it does not happen that often. Perhaps that is true, but why would a home seller who is not experienced with survey matters take even the slightest risk if they didn't have to?

The potential risk that goes along with the survey affidavit of no change is by no means worth saving the land surveyor's fee. In the case above, the buyer and sellers both sustained financial losses, and a land surveyor out there somewhere saw another piece of his expertise, along with the associated fee, fade away. Not only should these survey affidavit "horror stories" be shared with potential consumers of our services, but further protection should be given to the public. Home sellers need to be properly informed about this document, and how by signing it, they are essentially shifting the liability from the surveyor onto themselves. While many signers of the survey affidavit may believe that after the closing they are free and clear of any more liability, this is simply not the case. Perhaps it should be made mandatory that a warning stamp be placed on the survey affidavit of no change form explaining the risk and potential implications of signing it. The seller is holding the cards when it comes to the affidavit; if they are made fully aware of what they are signing, then our services will probably be more in demand.

The affidavit of no change is a losing proposition all the way around. It is neither in the best interest of the buyer and can be very detrimental, financially speaking, to the seller. Perhaps the surveying industry as a whole can push for legislation through our state and national professional societies to create this proposed consumer warning label that could be placed directly on the form at the top. The affidavit form would have to be given to the property sellers soon after the contract sale is signed, along with a requirement that an attorney explain the pros and cons of signing the no change form. This would give the purchasers time to order a survey in case the sellers did not want to sign the no change form. Because the pressure to just sign everything that comes across a desk at a closing table is enormous, I believe the timeline of the sellers receiving the affidavit form would be paramount to the success of this campaign. Hopefully professional land surveyors will agree on the importance of this for the consumer and themselves alike. I have included a sample "warning" at the end of this article; perhaps this will serve as a starting point for the surveying profession to launch an effective campaign of change in an effort to execute their statutory duty.

Christopher Ernst has a degree in Engineering Technology from New Jersey Institute of Technology. He is a New Jersey Professional Land Surveyor and has been employed at a small family-owned surveying business for 12 years.

Sample Warning label:
By signing this form the sellers are transferring the liability normally incurred by a professional land surveyor performing a current survey from the surveyor to the seller. There may be survey issues with your property, including, but not limited to, encroachments you may not be aware of, evidence of easements, encroachments by adjoining property owners and undisclosed boundary line issues and/or errors that only a current land survey would reveal. Although the purchaser's mortgage company and/or title company may not need a current survey for this particular transaction that does not necessarily mean the purchasers do not. If the seller signs this form then an original signed and sealed survey must be attached. Copies are not permitted and may be an infringement of federal copyright law.

A 843Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

< Prev

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Thought Leader: Land is Too Important to Be Left to Land Specialists
A while back I was searching the Internet for an old treatise on land titles. A Google query yielded a book published in 1914. The author was Charles Claudius Kagey and the book was titled "Land Survey and Land Titles, a book for boys and girls, a reference volume for property owners, a text ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Wacker vs. Price - Irony in Sevenfold
This month's case takes us to Phoenix, Arizona in 1950. The Arizona Supreme Court went all guns-a-blazin' in Wacker vs. Price (216 P.2d 707 (Ariz. 1950)). Maybe it's just me, but I'm sensing plenty of irony and have taken license to point it out along the way. I like what the Court did with this case ....
Read the Article
Allen E. Cheves 
Around the Bend - A Visit to Carlson Software
The Ohio River is one of America's greatest, running near 1,000 miles between Pittsburgh and the Mighty Mississippi. Much of the coal and other products that fueled our nation's industrial expansion flowed between the shores of this maritime ....
Read the Article
Lee Lovell, PS 
Surveying & Mapping Economics Part 3 - Customers & Services
This article continues an inquiry into the economic conditions of the Surveying and Mapping industry (NAICS 541370) using data from the U.S. Census Bureau. This time we will look at customers and services. The data comes from the Economic Census conducted every 5 years on American ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
True Elevation: Black Elk Peak
Black Elk Peak, located in the Black Hills region of South Dakota, is the state's highest natural point. It is frequently referred to as the highest summit in the United States east of the Rocky Mountains. Two other peaks, Guadalupe Peak in Texas and ....
Read the Article
Larry Trojak 
Bringing The Goods - Mobile Scanning an Integral Component
When Jim Smith, Jerrad Burns and Charlie Patton left the Memphis division of a major construction company in 2015, they took with them the knowledge of how to get even the most complex jobs done and what equipment could best serve them in making that happen. So when they joined West ....
Read the Article
Lee Lovell, PS 
Test Yourself 41: Integers, Integers, and Integers
ABF is a 5:12:13 triangle, ACF is a 48:55:73 triangle, ADF is a 3:4:5 triangle, and AEF is a 7:24:25 triangle, all with integer sides and inscribed in a semi-circle. What are the lengths of BC, CD, and DE? ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Sunset or Sunrise?
While we often think of legislated government programs as static, they do change over time. Such evolution and opportunity for transformation are part of the dialogue in reauthorizing these programs. Every so many years there is a sunset on each government program, and this September is the ....
Read the Article


Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
contact Amerisurv


JAVAD Intros
Spoofer Buster

press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content


News Feeds

Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.


Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 



The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
905 W 7th St #331
Frederick MD 21701
301-695-1538 - fax