About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents

Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By

Product Reviews
Partner Sites







Spatial Media LLC properties




Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

Phased Contracting Print E-mail
Written by Michael J. Pallamary, LS   
Saturday, 22 May 2010

A 609Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

One of the biggest challenges in operating a profitable land surveying business is the impact of unexpected evidence and its effect on client relationships. Not surprisingly, the two are oftentimes related and when problems arise, it can affect one's business reputation along with the proverbial bottom line. If you are in business, it is assumed you intend to make a profit. If that is not your goal, you should reevaluate your financial objectives.

One of the most frustrating challenges in land surveying is the influence of so-called "non-record" or unreferenced monuments and the effects of unrecorded survey plats. On one hand, non-record monuments and unrecorded plats can be beneficial if they result in the correct solution. Conversely, if the evidence contradicts anticipated results, these rogue documents can rapidly complicate any project. All in all, it is the unexpected things that create the headaches.

Notwithstanding the dilemma these scenarios create for the surveyor, most clients are not concerned with such problems. All they care about is where the marks are and when their jobs will be completed. At the end of the day, most problems like this translate into delays and disputes between the client and the surveyor. For better or for worse, good faith fee quotations, timing, and contracted scope of work are usually rendered irrelevant. Clearly the client has no intention of paying for these cost overruns. In most cases, the ingenuous land surveyor is forced to absorb these costs. Who cares if you found an unrecorded plat map or some conflicting monuments?

Fortunately, by anticipating problems like this, and by taking the time to educate clients, your bottom line can be enhanced. With a little planning, there is no reason you cannot maintain good client relationships while running a profitable business, and you can be assured that you will be paid for your services in accordance with the terms of your agreement.

With regards to absorbing the economic consequences of unearthing unrecorded documents, this is akin to a doctor, who, in the course of examining a patient, discovers a previously undetected problem, but instead of discussing it with the patient, he or she opts to say nothing and hopes the condition will not become an issue. When a surveyor is pressed as to why he or she bid so low on a job, a typical response may be that he or she "just wanted to be competitive," or "just needed the work."

Does one take the same approach in the world of medicine? If a doctor finds evidence of cancer, is he/she going to only charge the fee quoted for the yearly physical? Why then does the land surveyor stoop to a tradesman's approach to work? The professional land surveyor is not a ditch digger or a hired laborer, but rather a skilled and licensed professional who is hired to establish and defend a client's largest investment—­home and hearth.

To the savvy business owner, many problems can be avoided by implementing "phased" or "tiered" contracting, with meticulous methods of billing and benchmark-based events. Just as a systematic approach to client treatment is a proven model for the medical and legal professions, the same systematic approach can be applied to a land surveyor's business. The need to map and monument a piece of property are steps that should be evaluated and reviewed before any actions are taken. To do otherwise can lead to litigation and disputes and although there are two sides to a coin, one must ask, does it really benefit a property owner to advance litigation if, even though unavoidable, it can be planned for and assessed? Imagine going to the doctor's office to complain about a stomachache and instead of discussing various treatment options, the doctor immediately admits you to the hospital so that he/she can perform radical surgery?

In the business of land surveying there are generally four distinct phases of work: Baseline Research, Reconnaissance and Field Study, Field Survey, and Final Documentation:

Phase 1: Baseline Research
Under this phase, the surveyor is engaged to conduct an inspection and review of the client's deeds, maps and other documents, which may include a chain of title and a title report. Are there any easements, agreements, recorded licenses, title conflict disclosures, or adverse claims that might affect the surveyor's opinion? What of private deed restrictions? This phase may also involve research at the County Recorder's office, the Registry of Deeds, the County Surveyor, the City Agency, and any other records repository.

Once all the documentation is compiled, the surveyor should meet with the client to review his/her findings if necessary. If the research is unremarkable, the client can authorize the surveyor to proceed to Phase 2. If, on the other hand, Phase 1 uncovers conflicting evidence, the surveyor should review the evidence to determine where the problem is likely to occur and the potential ramifications. If the evidence discloses a conflict with a neighboring property, the client should be entitled to evaluate the situation. If significant, the client may elect to seek legal counsel in anticipation of a dispute, all before the stakes are set.

Phase 2: Reconnaissance and Field Study
This phase involves a conventional field reconnaissance to unearth or observe both record and non-record monuments. This phase also affords the surveyor the opportunity to see if the monuments comport with existing fences and improvements. In addition to identifying potential problems, the surveyor can decide what kind of survey and equipment will be appropriate. Should corners be staked? Should the surveyor who placed the monuments be consulted? Is there evidence indicating easements may need to be created? Will the survey need to be filed or recorded?

Phase 3: Field Survey
This phase involves the actual field survey. Control lines will be established with recoverable markers and the field ties will be made. Once the final calculations have been completed, final monuments will be set and if any conflicts such as encroachments or alternate lines of occupation are observed, they are located and the field work is concluded.

Phase 4: Project Documentation
Based upon the results of the previous phases, the final scope of work will become evident and the costs for this work will have been refined. This process and the evidence uncovered will dictate the form and content of the final documentation. Will the survey need to be recorded or filed? Will the attorney want a plat map? Will a land description need to be prepared? Will an easement deed solve the problem? Because the encountered problems were discussed early on, every step taken by the surveyor will have been done with the knowledge of the client and he/she will have been afforded the opportunity to obtain legal counsel if needed. It is disturbing to learn that some surveyors will conduct a survey and then place their markers in the middle of the neighbor's front yard and then send a bill for their "services." In the meantime their client has been threatened, or worse, sued by their neighbor because of the actions of the client's surveyor.

Collective Solutions
It is evident that by adopting this phased approach to contracting, the problems encountered in the determination of boundary lines are incrementally evaluated, all in the best interest of the surveyor, the client, and the adjoiner. Moreover, most legal problems can be evaluated before monuments are placed. Sadly, it is the imprudent surveyor who casts a client's fate.

Another advantage in evaluating potential problems is that the temperament of the conflicted adjoiner can be assessed. Perhaps the surveyor might consider meeting with the neighbor to let them know what they are doing. What if the neighbor has an unrecorded plat map from his surveyor, who, although having failed to file his or her survey, set otherwise valid property markers or preserved the location of original monumentation? What if the reason the neighbor's survey has not been recorded is because it was performed last month? In problem areas it might be advisable to confer with other local surveyors so as to avoid the filing of conflicting maps. A collective solution wherein evidence can be shared and the best solution can be developed is a benefit to the community and the profession at large.

Michael Pallamary is President of Pallamary & Associates in La Jolla, California. He is an Executive Board member of the Land Surveyors Advisory Council on Technical Standards and author of various articles and treatises on land surveying. He is a frequent lecturer for survey seminars, university conferences and surveying organizations.

A 609Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

< Prev   Next >

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Thought Leader: Land is Too Important to Be Left to Land Specialists
A while back I was searching the Internet for an old treatise on land titles. A Google query yielded a book published in 1914. The author was Charles Claudius Kagey and the book was titled "Land Survey and Land Titles, a book for boys and girls, a reference volume for property owners, a text ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Wacker vs. Price - Irony in Sevenfold
This month's case takes us to Phoenix, Arizona in 1950. The Arizona Supreme Court went all guns-a-blazin' in Wacker vs. Price (216 P.2d 707 (Ariz. 1950)). Maybe it's just me, but I'm sensing plenty of irony and have taken license to point it out along the way. I like what the Court did with this case ....
Read the Article
Allen E. Cheves 
Around the Bend - A Visit to Carlson Software
The Ohio River is one of America's greatest, running near 1,000 miles between Pittsburgh and the Mighty Mississippi. Much of the coal and other products that fueled our nation's industrial expansion flowed between the shores of this maritime ....
Read the Article
Lee Lovell, PS 
Surveying & Mapping Economics Part 3 - Customers & Services
This article continues an inquiry into the economic conditions of the Surveying and Mapping industry (NAICS 541370) using data from the U.S. Census Bureau. This time we will look at customers and services. The data comes from the Economic Census conducted every 5 years on American ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
True Elevation: Black Elk Peak
Black Elk Peak, located in the Black Hills region of South Dakota, is the state's highest natural point. It is frequently referred to as the highest summit in the United States east of the Rocky Mountains. Two other peaks, Guadalupe Peak in Texas and ....
Read the Article
Larry Trojak 
Bringing The Goods - Mobile Scanning an Integral Component
When Jim Smith, Jerrad Burns and Charlie Patton left the Memphis division of a major construction company in 2015, they took with them the knowledge of how to get even the most complex jobs done and what equipment could best serve them in making that happen. So when they joined West ....
Read the Article
Lee Lovell, PS 
Test Yourself 41: Integers, Integers, and Integers
ABF is a 5:12:13 triangle, ACF is a 48:55:73 triangle, ADF is a 3:4:5 triangle, and AEF is a 7:24:25 triangle, all with integer sides and inscribed in a semi-circle. What are the lengths of BC, CD, and DE? ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Sunset or Sunrise?
While we often think of legislated government programs as static, they do change over time. Such evolution and opportunity for transformation are part of the dialogue in reauthorizing these programs. Every so many years there is a sunset on each government program, and this September is the ....
Read the Article


Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
contact Amerisurv


JAVAD Intros
Spoofer Buster

press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content


News Feeds

Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.


Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 



The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
905 W 7th St #331
Frederick MD 21701
301-695-1538 - fax