About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents
 
advertisement


Subscriptions
Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
     RTN
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By


Product Reviews
Partner Sites

machinecontrolonline 


lbszone.com

GISuser.com

GeoJobs.biz

GeoLearn

 

Spatial Media LLC properties

Associates

ASPRS

newsnow 

Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

Point to Point: The Digital Surveys Archive Print E-mail
Written by Joel Leininger, LS   
Friday, 05 December 2008

A 83Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

A show of hands now: How many of you produced a hand-drawn plat or map within the last month? Within the last year? Undoubtedly there are surveyors still drawing by hand, but their numbers get smaller and smaller as the years pass. For the rest of us, the digital age means not only that computations and finances are handled on a computer, but the drafting as well.

We have explored aspects of the digital age's impact on surveyors before, but this time we'll examine a different aspect of it: the archive of your finished work.

Instinctively, surveyors hoard the results of their work, primarily for two reasons: first, it is likely that the work will be useful in the event that a future project is in its vicinity; second, at the end of their career, the records will be worth millions. Okay, I'm dreaming about that last part, but most surveyors at least hold out hope that the accumulated mass of records will convert into greenbacks when the time comes to put away the tripods for good.

(As an aside, I have observed that firms run by engineers generally have poor records indexing systems. Engineers view retaining records of their prior work not as an aid to future projects, but as a defense against potential negligence claims. Accuse them of substandard work, or of not complying with this or that regulation, and they can trot out the files in question to prove their innocence. Thus, after the expiration of the statute of limitations on such claims, there is no value to retaining those records. This has dramatic implications for how, or whether, one indexes those papers. Since any negligence claim will concern a specific project, there is no need for general location-based indexes.

Surveyors, on the other hand, view the records as both the defense above, and also as having the potential to inform future work. Thus, knowing which of those old records are relevant to current work, generally a proximity-driven test, is an important asset. Unfortunately, the firms run by engineers tend to extend their records perspective to their survey archives as well, the result being that their survey archive indexes are something of a shambles too. I am not pointing fingers here­I have worked for both types of firms­and there are probably notable exceptions to this rule. But I think, in general, my observation is accurate. Maintaining location-based indexes comes at a cost, and the surveyors in those engineering firms face an uphill battle getting approval to spend the non-billable time creating them.)

Non-specialized Software
Central to the concept of a well-designed digital archive is the notion that its contents do not require specialized software to be accessed. In other words, it is unwise to assume that the software now present on your machines will always be available in the future. None of us can know what lies around the corner, much less what lies around corners to be approached 30 or 50 years from now. Yet surveyors, by doing nothing, assume that the original software will suffice. History indicates otherwise.

Digital file formats, a sore that has yet to heal over, bedevil long-term archive planning. Because of licensing and other format issues surrounding commercial CAD software, retaining the drawing file itself as the archive vehicle is not a wise option. In fact, reliance on any vendorcontrolled format is a dangerous practice. But CAD files are not necessary for our archives. We surveyors want those drawings not to manipulate or change in any way, but merely to read and understand, decades or even centuries later. Surveys never expire, only surveyors do! So our accessing these drawings does not require our being able to modify them, the primary advantage of a CAD format.

So if the CAD files are not the best candidates for archival storage, what should be used? The feeling of archivists is that uncompressed color or gray scale TIF files provide the best digital format. That format preserves all of the information from the initial scan, and is able to be modified in the future with no loss of original material. It also results in very large files, in case you were wondering, which is its biggest detriment. In contrast, our firm uses JPG files as primary archive format, because the files are about 10 percent the size of a comparable TIF file. JPG files intentionally discard some material during the compression process, and repeated compressions and saves materially degrades the image. Hence, the archivists' objection. But these drawings are archives, not working drawings. We never modify them, nor will we in the future, and thus, do not subject them to multiple compressions. Our experience has been very positive.

File Size
It may occur to you that file size is becoming less important as the equipment we play with gets more powerful. And this is true; however, it is not accurate to say that it is irrelevant. Having the same drawing represented in two equally readable and usable formats, but one being ten times the size of the other, restricts flexibility in the larger file's use with no corresponding benefit. Emailing large files continues to be a problem. It may not remain so in the future, but it is hard to imagine being tripped-up because a file is too small. Thus, all other things being equal, smaller file size is better. The most important thing is for surveyors to have files in formats widely available now and in the future, and not controlled by any single entity. TIF, JPG and GIF files all satisfy that criteria, the patents having expired in the U.S. Moreover, multiple viewers are available from multiple sources for each of the formats, and thus are all worthy of consideration for your archives. Those are safe formats.

Case in Point
About a year ago, our firm ceased generating finished drawings (and internal worksheets, for that matter) on "reproducible media." We now print out multiple copies of drawings on bond paper for our clients and others, and also one "for us," which gets scanned and uploaded into our permanent digital archive. Should we need another copy, we print out a copy of that scanned image. The results, if I may say, are impressive.

The digital age brings with it many advantages, and many opportunities for failure. Don't let your survey archives fall into the latter category. It will doom them to irrelevance.

Joel Leininger is a principal of S.J. Martenet & Co. in Baltimore and Associate Editor of the magazine. 

A 83Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

 
< Prev   Next >

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Editorial 
Thought Leader: Land is Too Important to Be Left to Land Specialists
A while back I was searching the Internet for an old treatise on land titles. A Google query yielded a book published in 1914. The author was Charles Claudius Kagey and the book was titled "Land Survey and Land Titles, a book for boys and girls, a reference volume for property owners, a text ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Wacker vs. Price - Irony in Sevenfold
This month's case takes us to Phoenix, Arizona in 1950. The Arizona Supreme Court went all guns-a-blazin' in Wacker vs. Price (216 P.2d 707 (Ariz. 1950)). Maybe it's just me, but I'm sensing plenty of irony and have taken license to point it out along the way. I like what the Court did with this case ....
Read the Article
Allen E. Cheves 
Around the Bend - A Visit to Carlson Software
The Ohio River is one of America's greatest, running near 1,000 miles between Pittsburgh and the Mighty Mississippi. Much of the coal and other products that fueled our nation's industrial expansion flowed between the shores of this maritime ....
Read the Article
Lee Lovell, PS 
Surveying & Mapping Economics Part 3 - Customers & Services
This article continues an inquiry into the economic conditions of the Surveying and Mapping industry (NAICS 541370) using data from the U.S. Census Bureau. This time we will look at customers and services. The data comes from the Economic Census conducted every 5 years on American ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
True Elevation: Black Elk Peak
Black Elk Peak, located in the Black Hills region of South Dakota, is the state's highest natural point. It is frequently referred to as the highest summit in the United States east of the Rocky Mountains. Two other peaks, Guadalupe Peak in Texas and ....
Read the Article
Larry Trojak 
Bringing The Goods - Mobile Scanning an Integral Component
When Jim Smith, Jerrad Burns and Charlie Patton left the Memphis division of a major construction company in 2015, they took with them the knowledge of how to get even the most complex jobs done and what equipment could best serve them in making that happen. So when they joined West ....
Read the Article
 
Lee Lovell, PS 
Test Yourself 41: Integers, Integers, and Integers
ABF is a 5:12:13 triangle, ACF is a 48:55:73 triangle, ADF is a 3:4:5 triangle, and AEF is a 7:24:25 triangle, all with integer sides and inscribed in a semi-circle. What are the lengths of BC, CD, and DE? ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Sunset or Sunrise?
While we often think of legislated government programs as static, they do change over time. Such evolution and opportunity for transformation are part of the dialogue in reauthorizing these programs. Every so many years there is a sunset on each government program, and this September is the ....
Read the Article
 

deliciousrssnewsletterlinkedinfacebooktwitter

Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
please
contact Amerisurv


Google
 
AMERISURV TOP NEWS

JAVAD Intros
Spoofer Buster

GOT NEWS? Send To
press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content

Sponsor


News Feeds

 
Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps
Careers

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.

 

Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 

twitter

 




The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
905 W 7th St #331
Frederick MD 21701
301-620-0784
301-695-1538 - fax