RTN expert Gavin Schrock provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
Test Yourself
Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions. Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
A 91Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE
Twice recently the idea of surveyors "splitting the difference" on a dispute between them has come across my desk. And twice I have cringed.
Those who know me know that I am not usually one to walk away from an argument (to which I plead guilty), but my reticence on this particular point has nothing to do with being hard-headed; instead it concerns our obligations and duties as surveyors.
What's Not to Like?
Compromise in a dispute can be (and usually is) a good thing. After all, the centerpiece of ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) is the notion that, given good faith on both sides, some middle ground can be found upon which both sides can agree. Middle ground settles controversies.
So why does the notion of compromise in a boundary dispute bother me? In short, because it usually involves abandoning our "prime directive:" retrace. Let's unpack the specifics.
With the advent of electronic measuring devices, most of the quantitative (i.e., measurement) differences from surveyor to surveyor have decreased to trivialities. Is there any disagreement on that score? We simply do not encounter vast observational differences between modern surveys these days. This is not to say that disputes wholly surrounding measurements will never be seen again--after all, small magnitudes can still generate big controversies, especially in densely populated areas--but I believe it unlikely, for instance, that we will see the classes of errors common up through the 1960s. We have electronics to thank for this, and that's a good thing.
But disagreements between surveyors remain common. The mechanics of surveying have been supplanted as the culprit by something infinitely more challenging: boundary evidence.
Surveyors, as fact finders, are left to themselves to determine the appropriate evidence, both physical and written, for establishing property lines. No one else is under any obligation to supply us with any help (contrary language in the ALTA/ACSM standards notwithstanding), and, in my experience, they rarely try. This is not to say that surveyors have free rein to do as they wish, but that the discovery and evaluation of that evidence falls solely on us.
Put another way, we are in search of a certain set of facts, the collection of which constituted the survey (or surveys) we are retracing. The true location of a particular corner is a fact. Its relationship to adjacent corners or other tracts is one or more facts. Each of these facts left behind residue, perhaps a monument, perhaps a measurement, perhaps notations in field notes, etc. The facts are sometimes dependent on one another, and sometimes not. For instance, some property corners may never have had monuments placed at them, and the retracement thereof must necessarily be dependent on measurements from elsewhere. Other corners have original, undisturbed, identifiable monuments and thus are not dependent on anything else for establishment. Some deeds are senior to some and junior to others. Our retracement is the sum of our opinions regarding those facts. Ideally, assembling the correct set of facts, and interpreting the evidence about them, results in a correct property outline.
Easier said, of course, than done. Hampering our task are the vagaries of unclear documents, lost monuments and the millions of other pitfalls common to investigative tasks. Nevertheless, at the conclusion of our retracement, we have (hopefully) evaluated the evidence available, in light of correct doctrine. This is the essence of defensible retracement.
And it Begins
Now comes another surveyor who, after reviewing our results, claims that one or more of our positions are incorrect. After consultation with him and reviewing the evidence on which his assertions are based, we have three choices: 1. Adopt his retracement on those positions because we are convinced that his evidence and analysis is more defensible than ours (I don't characterize this as a compromise. It is a reevaluation of our opinions based on evidence previously unknown to us, and is one of the marks of a true professional.) 2. Reject his evidence and analysis as inferior to ours. Oddly, this is also one of the marks of a true professional. Doing so, after articulating why, may convince him of the validity of our position. (If not, well, too bad.) And finally, 3. Take some of ours and some of his and feather the two together, splitting the difference, as it were, in an effort to make everyone happy and avoid controversy. Ouch. Here is where the train runs off the track.
There is no doctrinal basis for adopting evidence we have rejected as inconsistent with the balance of our retracement. I realize that practicalities inject themselves into the thought processes here, but we must remember what our charge is: fidelity to the original survey. Deviating from that fidelity, even with the best of intentions, breeches our authority as surveyors.
We Can't, but They Can
Nothing prevents owners from entering into an agreement with one another that trumps the title and survey history of the line in question. In other words, owners are free to agree that, notwithstanding the location (or locations!) of the line resulting from a comprehensive analysis of the evidence, hereafter the line will be located as follows... Obviously, the signatories to that agreement, if it is to have the desired effect, would have to include all parties-ininterest. And the compromise, to bind all successors in the property, must be properly executed, delivered and probably recorded, depending on the jurisdiction. Informal agreements do not get the job done. But assuming all this takes place, the agreement would establish a new (compromised) position for the boundary.
The bright line that should appear from the discussion above is that our authority to compromise does not exist, although property owners labor under no such limitation. As fact finders, we have no agency powers. We cannot bind property owners to agreements to which they were not parties. We are not operating on behalf of our clients, but as independent advisers to them. Leave compromise to those actually empowered to enter into one. That is not us, and we should not forget it.
Joel Leininger is a principal of S.J. Martenet & Co. in Baltimore and Associate Editor of the magazine.
A 91Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE
Editorial: Following the Footsteps, Old and New
Our cover this month pays tribute to a group of Wyoming surveyors who organized an expedition to Surveyor's Notch in the Wind River Mountain Range, following the footsteps of the Hayden expedition's surveyor/topographer/cartographer A.D. Wilson and crew. On those days when you're feeling stressed and .... Read the Article
Wow Factor: Image Integration: A High-Productivity Approach to Managing Digital Photography
Surveyors today employ a variety of ways for documenting their field surveys. Measurements and descriptions are recorded in electronic data collectors. Audio recorders can be used to record comments and parol evidence from property owners and other stakeholders. Field books contain .... Read the Article
Surveyor's Notch
It's March 2008. I'm in the office downloading data, and Jay says "Hey, I found something in a book I was reading about a feature in the Wind Rivers called Surveyor's Notch. Have you heard of that?" "Yeah," I reply, "it's right there by Wind River Peak. I can see it from the top of the hill as I drive to ... Read the Article
Celestial Observations: A Brief History of Elgin, Knowles & Senne and their Ephemerides
Until the early 1980s practically all surveyors used the Altitude Method to determine the astronomic direction of a line, based on a celestial observation of the sun. That method required the surveyor to measure the vertical angle to the sun, but did not ... Read the Article
Marketing Techniques for Laser Scanning Service Providers
I frequently hear surveyors and office managers saying, "This scanning stuff, in ten years everyone will have it—that's the future." That is confirmation that 3D Laser Scanning has been accepted among the general land surveying community. Those of you scanning for a half decade or more can .... Read the Article
Mobile Scanning is Good Business
Killer bees, 108-degree heat and minus 45-degree cold: these are conditions under which Clay Wygant has worked, and they're all too familiar to many surveyors. But what excites the senior surveyor and his team today is mobile scanning technology. Since implementing an Optech LYNX .... Read the Article
Hardware & Software Review: Carlson Surveyor and SurvCE
If you're in the market for an extremely durable, fast, comfortable and well-equipped data collector, check out the Carlson Surveyor. Based on drafting specifications by the folks at Carlson Software and using the very reputable people at Juniper Systems to make it a reality, this unique data collector merits ... Read the Article
GIS Data Integration with the GCDB
In April 2000 by the Western Governors Association adopted the Bureau of Land Management's Geographic Coordinate Database (GCDB) as the preferred representation of the Public Lands Survey System (PLSS) for GIS applications. This is significant in the western states where ... Read the Article
Vantage Point: Watch Your Language
If we as surveyors sometimes find the language of deeds murky, imagine the misunderstandings among laypeople—many attorneys included. Recent clients had to defend themselves against new neighbors claiming a right to cross my clients' property, based upon recycled language in my ... Read the Article
FeedBack Compass Pointers. In reference to "Training Recruiters: A New TwiST" by Tim Kent, LS, [Feb. 2009], here is a tip for compass pointing students. Take the pens out of your hand. A typical ball point pen will draw the needle considerably. Also, a cell phone within a few feet will also interfere. Thanks for a great ... Read the Article
Survey Or No Survey: The Unlicensed Land Surveyor
When is locating someone's property corners or boundary lines not considered the practice of land surveying? Unfortunately, this question has become a gray area in the surveying profession, and some licensing boards are seemingly unable to control the actions of unlicensed individuals doing ... Read the Article
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.