About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents
 
advertisement


Subscriptions
Software Reviews
Sponsored By

Continuing Series
     RTN
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By


Product Reviews
Partner Sites

machinecontrolonline 


lbszone.com

GISuser.com

GeoJobs.biz

GeoLearn

 

Spatial Media LLC properties

Associates

ASPRS

newsnow 

Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

State Surveys of the Great Depression Print E-mail
Written by Jerry Penry, LS   
Saturday, 30 September 2006

A 691Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

The Great Depression of the 1930s, largely triggered by the stock market crash of 1929, affected virtually every occupation including land surveying and civil engineering. Engineering companies that thrived in the roaring 1920s found themselves searching for any work. By the fall of 1933, the Federal Emergency Relief Administration contacted the United States Coast & Geodetic Survey (C&GS), the predecessor to the National Geodetic Survey (NGS), to administer a relief measure with the primary objective of creating employment for needy surveyors and engineers.

The initial goal was to employ up to 15,000 workers with the project to begin immediately upon approval. C&GS accepted the worthy assignment from an altruistic motive, but not without some serious reservations. The key concern was that insufficient personnel with their own workloads would not be able to provide adequate supervision. C&GS also knew that instruments of the type needed for precise survey work would be hard to obtain on such short notice. Providing the vehicles needed for the work was an almost insurmountable task since funding for the project was to be primarily used for wages with strict limitations placed on the purchase of equipment and materials. The final concern was that work was to begin during the harsh winter months--the least productive season for survey work.

On November 27, 1933, formal approval was established and the project became part of the Civil Works Administration (CWA) with work immediately beginning in all states with no delay. A serious drawback was the fact that federal funding was available only until February 15, 1934, giving the project less than three months; however, there was every indication that Congress would approve further funding when that time arrived.

By January 19, 1934, the CWA issued orders to cease hiring new employees for the project. This greatly hampered operations since some states were still in the initial hiring process and were not even close to the quota of workers they had hoped to employ. Congress did provide more funding as the February deadline arrived, but prohibited the direct participation of any Federal Bureau after that date. With 10,000 employees in the project, each state was given the option to continue if they could be represented locally. C&GS personnel were relegated to an advisory capacity where they did their best to insure that the work was meeting acceptable standards. All but four states decided to continue the project with local representation. In the state of Nebraska, for instance, Willard J. Turnbull who was the professor in the Mechanics Arts Building at the University in Lincoln, assumed the role. Turnbull was well suited for the job since he had been a former officer with C&GS. Other states were less fortunate and relied upon the best available person who would agree to assume the responsibilities. Generally the state representatives did the work with no pay and continued working at their other jobs in addition to the work devoted to the State Survey projects.

On March 31, 1934, the CWA program ended with certain relief measures provided which would now be under the State Emergency Relief Administration. New rules stated that workers remaining in the projects had to work without any outside financial compensation. This naturally meant that some of the most skilled surveyors and engineers involved in the projects could no longer participate since they were finding fragments of other work to keep their struggling businesses open. Some exceptions were made to keep instrument operators on the crews where their expertise was needed most.

The state projects were often waterrelated, such as establishing horizontal and vertical control for rivers, canals, or dams. In many instances these projects would not have been considered had there been no need to create employment. Workers were generally assigned to projects in their own areas to eliminate the need for travel, food, and lodging expenses. To provide instruments, an appeal was made to railroads, state highway departments, construction companies, and municipalities to borrow unused equipment. C&GS agreed to assume the responsibility for their care and calibration upon return. The appeal was well-received, but the equipment was a mixture of various types of instruments of differing precision and certainly not what the C&GS was used to operating. Traverse closures were set at a minimum of 1:10,000, but some work was accepted at 1:5,000. Level loops were set at 0.05' per the square root of the number of miles run. Connections in the surveys were usually started and stopped at known C&GS monuments if possible. Horizontal control was adjusted to the North American Datum of 1927 (NAD27), and published in state plane coordinates. Elevations were adjusted to the Mean Sea Level Datum of 1929 (MSL29), which was renamed the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD29) by NGS in 1973. Transportation needs were met mainly by having workers use their own vehicles, with C&GS agreeing to maintenance when needed unless caused by negligence.

Statistics up to June 30, 1934, just seven months after the beginning of the project, showed the completion of 14,000 miles of traverse, 20,000 miles of levels, and 1,200 miles of triangulation. The permanent monuments resemble the familiar bronze disks set in concrete used by C&GS, but were lettered with the additional words "State Survey". The states of North Carolina and Pennsylvania decided to have disks cast with legends peculiar to their representative states. Due to the abrupt termination of the project, many monuments that were set in the projects ahead of the traverse and leveling crews were never used. Parts of the project struggled on until 1939, but the work continued less than a year in many states.

The project had both positive and negative aspects. Certainly the most positive was the employment of thousands of surveyors and engineers. This not only provided financially for the workers and their families, but also helped them to better understand how geodetic surveying was performed. One initial negative aspect of the project was the poor planning on the part of the federal government, who basically threw the project into the lap of C&GS with little warning. Only the final positions and elevations were submitted to C&GS, while the majority of the actual field work was never seen by them. With the development of the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88), NGS has taken the position that they will not publish any information unless they have the original observations. This leaves thousands of the CWA monuments with precision uncertainty since the actual field work cannot be verified. Although some of these monuments were later used by NGS during their own work and therefore published, many are hard to find since they are not available in the NGS datasheets.

Jerry Penry is employed by Lancaster County Engineering in Lincoln, Nebraska. He has been a licensed surveyor since 1994 specializing in section corner monumentation and GPS surveying.

A 691Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE 

 
< Prev   Next >

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Editorial 
Thought Leader: The Short Cut Method
I began my quest to become a land surveyor many years ago in Nebraska. I had the good fortune to have had a job wandering around the state retracing mile after mile of GLO surveys. These large scale boundary surveys offered all sorts of learning experiences. One of the object lessons came ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Boundary Fixed by Common Grantor
The case of Atwell v. Olson presented the Supreme Court of the State of Washington with the question of whether an agreed line between grantor and grantee is binding on subsequent owners? Here's another look at a grantee's meaning of the word "half." Unlike the case Wood v. Mandrilla ....
Read the Article
Barnes and Tucker 
Surveying the Colorado River Aqueduct
During the 1920s, the city of Los Angeles was burgeoning. Demographics were changing and geographic boundaries were being pushed out in all directions. Oil was booming, industrialization was in full swing, and water was in high demand. Southern ....
Read the Article
John Stenmark, PS 
Indoor Mobile Mapping Takes Off at LAX
Airports are key components of the global transportation infrastructure. They are complex, expensive investments that require tight management. In order to achieve efficient operations and optimized return on investment, it's essential to have ....
Read the Article
Larry Trojak 
Station to Station
Though most facets of the construction process stand to benefit from building information modeling (BIM), general contractors and construction managers could gain the most from the push toward its implementation. BIM, after all, is designed to help ....
Read the Article
Dave Lindell, PS 
Test Yourself: Thinking Inside the Box
A square's diagonal is intersected by a line from another vertex to the midpoint of an opposite side. A circle is inscribed in the triangle opposite the midpoint as shown. What is its radius if the side of the square is "s"? ....
Read the Article
 
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: A Few Words
"Proceed to the route." These are words I sometimes hear from my car's GPS--as if I would be asking for directions if I knew how to get to the route in the first place. Yes, this is a machine's response that does not take human frustration into account. But even human communication can take ....
Read the Article

deliciousrssnewsletterlinkedinfacebooktwitter

Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
please
contact Amerisurv


Google
 
AMERISURV TOP NEWS

Trimble Intros
S5 Ti-M

GOT NEWS? Send To
press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content

Sponsor


News Feeds

 
Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps
Careers

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.

 

Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 

twitter

 




The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
905 W 7th St #331
Frederick MD 21701
301-620-0784
301-695-1538 - fax