About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents

Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By

Product Reviews
Partner Sites







Spatial Media LLC properties




Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

I Think I Will Never See A Tree That Cannot Be—Part 2 Print E-mail
Written by Walt Robillard, Esq., PS, Forester   
Saturday, 21 January 2017

A 5.258Mb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

One of my last jobs as a contract administrator for the U.S. Forest Service was the administration of a 500-mile and 2,000-corner boundary retracement. One of the contract requirements was the creation of new bearing or witness or pointer trees at each corner. This was not an urban survey: it was a rural retracement, with accuracy primary and precision secondary. These trees were to be identified by species and diameter with a bearing and distance from each monumented corner to the new tree. While in pre-contract discussions with the selected firm, not of my choosing, I stressed the importance of the proper identification of trees and why this provision was in the contract. Under the guidelines we were required to observe, if the potential contractor assured us it could meet this requirement, our hands were tied. Discussion indicated the survey crews were mainly trained in "city" retracements" and their rural experience was lacking. After negotiations were completed and the contract was awarded--over my written objections--the fiscal staff was happy with the price quoted (lowest quote, of course) and awarded the contract. I had a "funny feeling" it was the start of a disastrous and possible litigious relationship. When the final product started being submitted, the field work (the number calculations) looked adequate but the field notes were something else. Bearing trees were of two species, "Pine" and "Oaks." No others were identified. A field check indicated that 100% of the bearing trees were misidentified by species as well as diameters. (I would like to point out that a 100% field inspection was made of each corner. This increased our cost of contract administration by over 1,000%, which we had not budgeted.) The contract staff authorities tried to hold me responsible for the overrun for administration based on their decision of the contractor. (As a side note the contract was scheduled to run for six months but it took nearly two years and the weather in this period was virtually rain free and perfect for field work.)

After writing a "cure contract order" with a requirement that they hire a forester to be a part of their crew, "all hell broke loose" when he, too, was woefully uneducated in tree identification. Since then I have created and taught several courses in tree identification to the un-informed and as a result, hopefully, I believe I have put together a rather simple one day course in "Dendrology" that students can study from a book that usually takes two semesters in college.

This article is for the un-informed professional who is supposed to know all there is to know about retracements. It can also be used for the lay person who wishes to improve his/her knowledge). Additionally, it is for a professional person who stands up in court or who identifies him/herself on their letterhead as a retracement expert or specialist. I hope this article will give these experts an opportunity to expand their knowledge.

In 1799 when Andrew Ellicott surveyed the 31st parallel between Spanish west Florida and the United states, this Colonial surveyor identified the native species by their scientific names by genus and species. Today there can be no question what trees he was talking about. Remember, Ellicott was a surveyor and not a dendrologist. His technical knowledge gave us what the actual name of the trees were and not some made up or local names. Figure 1 is a page from his 1803 report of his 1799 survey in which he gave specific identification of the trees he observed for posterity.

While at the New York State College of Forestry I took my Dendrology course from "Wild Bill" Harlow, the author of one of the primary texts on tree identification. He would teach us while making whistles out of "moosewood" which is a species of Maple. At the end of the class he would play a song on the whistle. As a result we gave him the moniker "Moosewood Bill." By the end of our sophomore year we were expected to be completely knowledgeable with the common and Latin scientific names, and the correct identification of over 200 American trees. This information has been very helpful to me in the advancement of my career as a retracement surveyor. I am not a high tech person, but I still consider myself a "dirt" surveyor who depends on fundamental knowledge for Finding the Footsteps.

I believe the first thing we have to understand is "what tree are we talking about?" I have offered advice and professional testimony on such trees as Button Wood, Bee Tree, Spruce Pine, Cabbage tree and some that defy spelling. First we need to identify and make certain we are talking about the same tree. Over the years a collection of the various names used for certain trees have been assembled by numerous individuals. In all probability, every species of tree was probably used and referenced under one name or the other. The major species referenced by early surveyors are listed below.

I would like to point out that my research has not been able to identify that elusive, abundantly-identified tree called the "Spanish Oak." The identified leaves are from the same Black oak that is growing in my front yard. The reader can see the variety of leaves it produced (Figure 2). It is my belief that the Spanish Oak was actually black oak that had produced these elongated leaves which reminded the surveyors of a Spanish sword.

In order for us all to be on the same branch and refer to the same tree or trees, the following list is a partial compilation from numerous sources of deeds, surveys, articles, and experience of tree names that have been used over the years. Some of the names are very local and are not seen in other areas.

The Oaks
Two primary categories are found; broadly they are the White oaks and Red (Black) oaks. White oaks make better bearing trees. The Black oak class is inferior. White oaks have leaves that have rounded lobes without "prickers" at end of lobe. Bark may be whiter with shallow lobes.Red oaks have "V" shaped lobe usually with a small "pricker" at end of lobe. It is my opinion that the Spanish Oak (no scientific name) identified by early surveyors was probably a variety of Red Oak, in that the leaves were elongated and with a distinctive "Prickle" on the end of the lobe. The leaf had a distinctive look of what people thought a Spanish sword looked like.

The wood of the two oaks is distinguishable by examining the two wood cores. Looking at the core with a 10X Hand lens, the pores of the white oak wood has occlusions (tyloses) that plug the pores. They inhibit water from moving throughout the wood thus inhibiting wood decay. The red oak wood lacks these occlusions and as such wood will decay more rapidly. This leads the retracing surveyor to a greater possibility of finding the remains of white oak trees as compared to red oak trees.

In examining original bearing trees one may find exotic trees referenced: Live Oak, Bald Cypress, Palm, or Cabbage.

If you asked the uninformed he/she would probably say hardwood or softwood, or pine and oak. The answer is yes and no. There are softwoods that are hard and hardwoods that are soft. Hardwoods that keep their leaves and softwood trees that lose their needles. It can be said that they are unpredictable except for certain points of identification.

Once we have agreed on a name let's look a little closer. In testimony I have had an opposing witness call a tree a basswood to have it turn out to be a magnolia. I had one opposing witness call a tree a Spruce pine only to have it be a white pine.

I was testifying in the case of Howell vs. the United States. A critical piece of evidence was the identification of a large blazed tree supposedly on the original line. The field notes called for WO. The Plaintiff's surveyor presented white oak leaves he had obtained from the ground to identify the tree. I went out in the field and shot a twig from the tree to identify the tree. I confirmed its preliminary bark identification when the twig was identified as the fruiting body of a basswood. Also, the trunk of the tree, when hit with an ax, sounded like a bass drum. See Figure 3. The key identification element was the fruiting body in the lower right corner which is called pendulant. Forestry students have also given them a somewhat risqué name that will be disclosed on a personal basis.

Here are a few of my suggested principles on how to make common sense out of common trees. They are:
1. What time of year was the tree identified? Are you dealing with leaves, branches or others factors?
2. How is it identified in the record you have?
3. Does the tree have leaves or needles?
4. If leaves or branching, is it alternate branching or opposite branching?
5. If opposite, does it fit MADCapHorse (Maples, Ash, Dogwood, * Honeysuckle/Viburnum (Caprifoliaceae), Horse chestnut)?
6. Is it an anomaly in its class? For example, cypress, a softwood that loses its needles in winter, or live oak that keeps its leaves in winter?
7. If needles; What kind and how many?
8. Is the leaf unique? Ginkgo, etc.
9. Is it a pine? Number of needles.
10. Is it simple leaf or compound leaf?
11. Is the bark unique? For example, hickory, beech, cherry.
12. If none of the above work, wait for later issues of the American Surveyor for further information or obtain one of the books listed in the sidebar.

Just as a surgeon cannot learn to do a heart replacement from a book, I do not expect the professional retracement surveyor to become an expert dendrologist from this article, but I hope it will provide sufficient incentive for those who wish to expand their knowledge to the point that when called on each will study and be able to become conversant with tree identification suitable to meet the needs of the modern expert. I will cover more aspects of tree identification in future articles.

Walt Robillard has been surveying since 1948. His experience includes teaching in colleges and continuing education seminars, and writing. He has worked in private industry and spent 30 years with the U.S. Forest Service as a Regional Surveyor and expert witness. He is an attorney, forester, licensed surveyor, and expert witness, and has co-authored several survey books.

Suggested Reading

They following books, pamphlets and articles are recommended reading: • • Publication of your state forest commission. Each state has printed booklets of native trees. Also probably available through your county forest department. One example is Know your Trees, Mississippi Extension Service, State College, MS.
• Trees of the World, Hermes House, This is one of the best books I have seen. I wish I had had it in college and in my world travels. The colored illustrations are superb.
• Textbook of Dendrology by Dr. Wm. L. Harlow; John Wiley and Son., New York. (Moosewood Bill)
• Native Trees of Canada; Bulletin 61, excellent photographs, an old but great early book. Kings Printer, Ottawa, Canada, 1949 Trees of North America, Brockman, St. Martins Press, Hand drawings of excellent quality.
• The Book of Trees, Grimm, Hard cover excellent 1x1 drawings.

A 5.258Mb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

< Prev   Next >

Marc Cheves, PS 
Editorial: A Great Year to be a Surveyor
Some magazines have what are called "theme" issues. That is, most of the content is focused on one particular subject. In my 22+ years of survey magazine publishing, my philosophy has always been to have a little bit of everything in each issue, thereby eliminating the possibility that ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Case Examinations: Halverson v. Deerwood Village
Whew! We really beat the snot out of Bryant v. Blevins and practical locations. Well this month we're back on new case that hit the Minnesota Supreme Court's docket in 1982. We've got the familiar gymnastics of jurisprudence featuring an extraordinary array of flying rope stretchers ...
Read the Article
Michel Philips 
Extreme Environment Surveying
A Franco-Chilean team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 rugged handheld for marine cave surveying, gathering data to classify the inaccessible northern half of Madre de Dios for UNESCO World Heritage. The team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 ....
Read the Article
Erik Dahlberg 
The Original Green Engineers
Sometimes, it's best just to leave things as you found them. That's the lesson shared by Dr. Richard Miksad and his students at the University of Virginia. As a result of studies covering nearly a decade, Miksad's teams have developed detailed ....
Read the Article
Dave Lindell, PS 
Test Yourself 49: No Dimensions
In square A-C-D-B with side S, C-E is tangent to the semicircle Q1 with diameter B-D. Q2 is the inscribed circle of A-C-E. The tangent to Q1 and Q2 meets the sides of the square at F and H and intersects C-E at t G. Q3 is the inscribed circle of C-G-H. What is the ratio of the radii of circles ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
Discovery on Grizzly Peak
When First Lieutenant Montgomery M. Macomb arrived in Carson City, Nevada, from Washington D.C., on July 28, 1878, his assigned survey crew from the 4th Artillery was waiting and ready for the new field season. At age 25, Macomb was the leader ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Fighting City Hall Over Land
Once upon a time (1989 to be exact) in a place not so far away from where I live, a man (Francis Galdo) bought a home across the street from a vacant parcel owned by the City of Philadelphia. That parcel, along with others, had been acquired by condemnation back in 1974 subsequent to a 1956 ....
Read the Article
Patrick C. Garner, PS 
Book Review: Boundary Retracement: Processes and Procedures
When I was in my mid-twenties and learning the honorable profession of land surveying, I was lucky to be guided by a mentor who would grab a book off his office shelf and say, "Every surveyor should have a copy of this!" The first example he waved at me was Davis, Foote and Kelly's Surveying ....
Read the Article


Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
contact Amerisurv


SXblue Announces
Premier Receiver

press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content


News Feeds

Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.


Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 



The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
7820B Wormans Mill Road, #236
Frederick MD 21701
301-695-1538 - fax