About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents

Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By

Product Reviews
Partner Sites







Spatial Media LLC properties




Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

Report on NCEES Symposium Print E-mail
Written by Michael J. Pallamary, PS   
Saturday, 12 March 2016

A 2.444Mb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

On Friday, January 22, I had the distinct honor of participating in an NCEES symposium on the future of land surveying, a daylong session, driven by the underlying topic, the decline in applicants for the land surveying exam. My involvement was principally as a journalist, on behalf of The American Surveyor Magazine while similarly observing things as a participant, two distinct roles.

The vast majority of the contributors were like me; older men who have been in the profession for some time. Not surprisingly, our perspectives were tempered by our common experiences. There were a number of common thoughts and concerns. At one level, this was rather comforting while on the other, it was somewhat depressing as some of us may be part of the problem, an observation that is not directed at the participants but instead, at the profession as a whole. In short, something is wrong when we cannot attract the best and brightest society has to offer us. Where are all the IPadtoting, Google-proficient, constantly-wired youth of today? Why aren't they interested in surveying? Perhaps, as bitter a pill as it is to swallow, their perspective may be more important than ours.

Setting aside the implications of this observation, three primary elements rose to the top of the discussion. The first and perhaps the most important was identifying what it is that we, as Professional Land Surveyors do. What distinguishes us from other professions if we indeed are a profession? At the national level, we are categorized as laborers; no professional recognition is afforded us. Everyone knows what an MD is but how many know what a PS is or a PLS or an RLS. Thus the problem.

Many of the members felt that the surveyor's use and familiarity with things like electronic measuring devices, GPS, aerial mapping, and computer technology define the Land Surveyor and set us apart in society. Our familiarity with the geospatial world and the tools that define these sciences are, perhaps, what define us. How then does one explain our absence from the world of GIS?

Considerable discussion occurred relative to the image of the Land Surveyor and the things that could be done to improve our perceived persona. Interestingly, everyone seemed to agree that we cannot allow ourselves to be defined by orange vests. For better or worse, most agreed that the public's perception of the Land Surveyor is defined by field crews, working on the side of the road, or by those who attend meetings clad in bright reflective safety vests, as if they are going to get run over at a planning commission meeting. Although everyone agrees that safety is important, perhaps our image should be afforded a similar level of prominence.

There was also considerable discussion about marketing and public relations, two business tools that are not used enough and for most, do not exist in the surveyor's repertoire of business skills. Assuming, for a moment, that the profession would be bettered if it promoted itself, who is our intended audience? Of what value does promoting surveying as a business advance the interests of a government employee? Do we have common goals?

As part of this discussion, the symposium facilitator challenged us to hypothesize an elevator talk. If you were on an elevator and someone asked you what you did, how would you answer? Some of the responses were pithy, thirty second sound bites while others were far more complicated, using terms that did little to explain what it is that surveyors did, explanations that were largely ineffective. How would you explain what it is that a Land Surveyor does in your elevator talk?

This led to the topic of marketing and public relations which, again, may mean something different to a public sector Land Surveyors and private sector Land Surveyors. How do we brand a national image and what steps must we take to get there? More importantly, who are we marketing ourselves to? Is it the general public, our customers, our employees, or even ourselves?

What image do we want to project? Is it one of a business person, comfortably ensconced in the comfort of an office or is it that of a woman in the field, with a GPS receiver strapped to her back, gathering data? Why are there not more women in the surveying profession? Is image important to the field surveyor who has limited exposure and interaction with the public? If not, why not? It is unlikely that he/she will be involved in any business meetings in the course of a day's work. Still, for some, they are unable to distinguish between the two activities; both are the same giving rise to the "orange vest syndrome."

Why cannot the field surveyor dress better? Perhaps he/she should leave the T-shirts at home and the torn pants in favor of a blouse or a button down shirt and clean slacks. Minor changes such as these could have a major impact on the public's perception of Land Surveyors.

Everyone talked about the influence of the technologies we, and others rely on, concluding that we are not the sole masters of GPS, LIDAR, GIS, UAV, and BIM. As one astute member of the group noted, GPS, LIDAR, GIS are not areas of practice. They are nothing more than tools, albeit fancy ones. We cannot regulate tools.

As our historical services have been largely eliminated, replaced by bits, bytes, and satellites, what is being done to protect the profession? What are our licensing boards doing to protect the practice of land surveying? Are they more interested in enforcement or advancement? Once, map making was the exclusive dominion of the Land Surveyor but that is no longer true. "GIS Professionals" do more map-making in one day than many Land Surveyors do in an entire year. What happened and why did the profession let that get away from us? Worse, because of the proliferation of GIS mapmakers and the surveying community's failure to embrace and tame GIS, significant pressure is being applied to the profession by GIS users who outnumber Land Surveyors by a hundred to one. They are seeking a path to licensure and professional status and the land surveying profession is the low hanging fruit.

In spite of these challenges, it is generally agreed that the determination of legal boundary lines is the one societal service that distinguishes the Professional Land Surveyor from other professions, regardless of the technologies used. If that is the case, how do we train today's apprentice surveyors when they are running around with robotic instruments and fancy GPS equipment, neither of which teach anything about boundary line determination, the one thing most Land Surveyors look to with pride. Is this not the one thing we do best?

As we come full circle, we must determine why there has been such a precipitous decline in applicants for the land surveying examination. Perhaps, it is because most applicants are simply unqualified and unprepared for the exam. Combined with the proliferation of robotic tools and digitally derived coordinates, none of these individuals are learning how to survey. Indeed there is a big difference between gathering data and knowing how to survey.

Clearly, the next generation of surveyors are headed in the wrong direction and their infatuation with technology is crippling. These well intended folks are running around measuring things while learning nothing about land surveying. Perhaps that is why they are no longer taking the surveyor's exam; they are simply not prepared.

Regardless of the reasons, and regardless whether you agree or not, the profession is in crisis. We must return to our roots and we must begin teaching the art of surveying again. This means we must also return to the field and apprentice. Surveying is not about fancy tools and shiny boxes with little keyboards. It is about the art and not the science.

It is possible the future of the profession rests on the shoulders of those who are asking important questions. Folks like those on this important committee who must be thanked for their devotion to the profession. The future of the profession rests equally on your shoulders.

Michael Pallamary, PS, is the author of several books and numerous articles. He is a frequent lecturer at conferences and seminars and he teaches real property to attorneys and other members of the legal profession. He has been in the surveying profession since 1971.

A 2.444Mb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

< Prev   Next >

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Marc Cheves, PS 
Editorial: A Great Year to be a Surveyor
Some magazines have what are called "theme" issues. That is, most of the content is focused on one particular subject. In my 22+ years of survey magazine publishing, my philosophy has always been to have a little bit of everything in each issue, thereby eliminating the possibility that ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Case Examinations: Halverson v. Deerwood Village
Whew! We really beat the snot out of Bryant v. Blevins and practical locations. Well this month we're back on new case that hit the Minnesota Supreme Court's docket in 1982. We've got the familiar gymnastics of jurisprudence featuring an extraordinary array of flying rope stretchers ...
Read the Article
Michel Philips 
Extreme Environment Surveying
A Franco-Chilean team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 rugged handheld for marine cave surveying, gathering data to classify the inaccessible northern half of Madre de Dios for UNESCO World Heritage. The team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 ....
Read the Article
Erik Dahlberg 
The Original Green Engineers
Sometimes, it's best just to leave things as you found them. That's the lesson shared by Dr. Richard Miksad and his students at the University of Virginia. As a result of studies covering nearly a decade, Miksad's teams have developed detailed ....
Read the Article
Dave Lindell, PS 
Test Yourself 49: No Dimensions
In square A-C-D-B with side S, C-E is tangent to the semicircle Q1 with diameter B-D. Q2 is the inscribed circle of A-C-E. The tangent to Q1 and Q2 meets the sides of the square at F and H and intersects C-E at t G. Q3 is the inscribed circle of C-G-H. What is the ratio of the radii of circles ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
Discovery on Grizzly Peak
When First Lieutenant Montgomery M. Macomb arrived in Carson City, Nevada, from Washington D.C., on July 28, 1878, his assigned survey crew from the 4th Artillery was waiting and ready for the new field season. At age 25, Macomb was the leader ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Fighting City Hall Over Land
Once upon a time (1989 to be exact) in a place not so far away from where I live, a man (Francis Galdo) bought a home across the street from a vacant parcel owned by the City of Philadelphia. That parcel, along with others, had been acquired by condemnation back in 1974 subsequent to a 1956 ....
Read the Article
Patrick C. Garner, PS 
Book Review: Boundary Retracement: Processes and Procedures
When I was in my mid-twenties and learning the honorable profession of land surveying, I was lucky to be guided by a mentor who would grab a book off his office shelf and say, "Every surveyor should have a copy of this!" The first example he waved at me was Davis, Foote and Kelly's Surveying ....
Read the Article


Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
contact Amerisurv


Carlson SurvCE &
SurvPC 6 Available

press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content


News Feeds

Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.


Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 



The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
7820B Wormans Mill Road, #236
Frederick MD 21701
301-695-1538 - fax