About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents
 
advertisement


Subscriptions
Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
     RTN
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By


Product Reviews
Partner Sites

machinecontrolonline 


lbszone.com

GISuser.com

GeoJobs.biz

GeoLearn

 

Spatial Media LLC properties

Associates

ASPRS

newsnow 

Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

Vantage Point: Bad Decisions Print E-mail
Written by Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM   
Saturday, 12 March 2016

A 137Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

Originally I was going to entitle this month's column, "When the Courts Get it Wrong." The problem is, depending upon which court we are talking about a decision we hate may be the new rule from that moment on. At that point "wrong" and "right" switch positions.

Bad decisions happen. On the national scene there was the series of suits the Presaults of Vermont pursued regarding whether or not conversion of a railroad easement to a trail was an unconstitutional taking. At one point in this very long and expensive pursuit of justice, the US Claims Court decided that rather than the laws and contractual language in effect when the easement was created in 1899, the proper way to decipher the intent of the original grant should be what was in effect at the time of the Presaults' land acquisitions (1966 to 1980).

Fortunately, this terrible decision was overturned by the US Court of Appeals four years, several suits, and many dollars later, upholding the terms of the original grant (100 F.3d 1525, 1996). Imagine the effect on every contract ever written if today's contractual language and laws controlled interpretation of documents written a decade or a century ago. Imagine the effect on every deed for every land interest and every boundary in the nation if no one had to go back to original intent. Thankfully the later decision averted such a disaster.

I've experienced bad decisions personally. In a chancery court suit about whether a right of way was public or private, the sole judge ignored all the deeds and instead based his decision upon a tax map that (1) had not been introduced as evidence and (2) the municipality said was wrong. While I found this outcome incredible, at least it affected only one landowner and not future cases.

Recently the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has upended the ability of landlocked property owners to rely on a law that originated in 1735 when Pennsylvania was a province controlled by the heirs of William Penn. It is presently is known as the Private Road Act of 1836, and provides a means for landlocked owners to petition for appointment of a Board of Viewers to determine necessity and location of a private means of access.

Timothy O'Reilly filed such a petition in 2004 due to the landlocked status of his property as a result of Pennsylvania's exercise of eminent domain to build Interstate 79. The primary protest of the affected parties (the respondents) was that opening a road under the Private Road Act would result in an unconstitutional taking of private property, because the use of any such easement is solely for private rather than public purpose. O'Reilly countered with prior Pennsylvania and US District Court decisions pronouncing the statute constitutionally sound and not an exercise of the power of eminent domain. As a side point, the public would benefit by the increased value of his no-longer-landlocked land's assessed value (thereby increasing public tax coffers).

In 2007 O'Reilly's right to rely on the Public Roads Act was upheld, relating the Act to the common law "way of necessity" doctrine. In 2008 the appellate court upheld the two prior decisions favoring O'Reilly, remanding the case to the trial court for the appointment of Viewers to establish the location of the private road.

But in 2009 the Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted the respondents' appeal to determine the constitutionality of the Private Roads Act. It then vacated the order for appointment of Viewers, and, in a 4-3 decision, remanded the case for further consideration (5 A.3d 246, 2010). In that remanded case (2011), the court decided it did not have enough information to determine if the public would be the primary beneficiary of the "taking", and sent the case back down to the trial court to hold a hearing, make findings of fact, and gather additional evidence.

Subsequently O'Reilly returned to Common Pleas Court in 2013, where his petition for appointment of Viewers was quashed, as opening a road under the Public Road Act would (now) be considered unconstitutional. His 2014 appeal yielded an opinion (100 A.3d 689) apologizing for having to follow the Supreme Court's rulings against his petition for Viewers. Four of the five separate concurring judges' opinions basically say that they did what they were instructed to do, but that they disagree with it being appropriate.

The problem is that later cases must now rely on the highest court's decision, already yielding some peculiar outcomes. Owners of an industrially-zoned site that is landlocked on three sides and bounded by a river on the fourth were astounded when the court overturned the Board of Viewers' determination that a private road was necessary, because the Viewers had not considered evidence regarding river access (11 A.3d 902, 2011). More apologies appear in the concurring opinions.

Wendy Lathrop is licensed as a Professional Land Surveyor in NJ, PA, DE, and MD, and has been involved since 1974 in surveying projects ranging from construction to boundary to environmental land use disputes. She is a Professional Planner in NJ, and a Certified Floodplain Manager through ASFPM.

A 137Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

 
< Prev

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Editorial 
Thought Leader: Land is Too Important to Be Left to Land Specialists
A while back I was searching the Internet for an old treatise on land titles. A Google query yielded a book published in 1914. The author was Charles Claudius Kagey and the book was titled "Land Survey and Land Titles, a book for boys and girls, a reference volume for property owners, a text ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Wacker vs. Price - Irony in Sevenfold
This month's case takes us to Phoenix, Arizona in 1950. The Arizona Supreme Court went all guns-a-blazin' in Wacker vs. Price (216 P.2d 707 (Ariz. 1950)). Maybe it's just me, but I'm sensing plenty of irony and have taken license to point it out along the way. I like what the Court did with this case ....
Read the Article
Allen E. Cheves 
Around the Bend - A Visit to Carlson Software
The Ohio River is one of America's greatest, running near 1,000 miles between Pittsburgh and the Mighty Mississippi. Much of the coal and other products that fueled our nation's industrial expansion flowed between the shores of this maritime ....
Read the Article
Lee Lovell, PS 
Surveying & Mapping Economics Part 3 - Customers & Services
This article continues an inquiry into the economic conditions of the Surveying and Mapping industry (NAICS 541370) using data from the U.S. Census Bureau. This time we will look at customers and services. The data comes from the Economic Census conducted every 5 years on American ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
True Elevation: Black Elk Peak
Black Elk Peak, located in the Black Hills region of South Dakota, is the state's highest natural point. It is frequently referred to as the highest summit in the United States east of the Rocky Mountains. Two other peaks, Guadalupe Peak in Texas and ....
Read the Article
Larry Trojak 
Bringing The Goods - Mobile Scanning an Integral Component
When Jim Smith, Jerrad Burns and Charlie Patton left the Memphis division of a major construction company in 2015, they took with them the knowledge of how to get even the most complex jobs done and what equipment could best serve them in making that happen. So when they joined West ....
Read the Article
 
Lee Lovell, PS 
Test Yourself 41: Integers, Integers, and Integers
ABF is a 5:12:13 triangle, ACF is a 48:55:73 triangle, ADF is a 3:4:5 triangle, and AEF is a 7:24:25 triangle, all with integer sides and inscribed in a semi-circle. What are the lengths of BC, CD, and DE? ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Sunset or Sunrise?
While we often think of legislated government programs as static, they do change over time. Such evolution and opportunity for transformation are part of the dialogue in reauthorizing these programs. Every so many years there is a sunset on each government program, and this September is the ....
Read the Article
 

deliciousrssnewsletterlinkedinfacebooktwitter

Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
please
contact Amerisurv


Google
 
AMERISURV TOP NEWS

JAVAD Intros
Spoofer Buster

GOT NEWS? Send To
press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content

Sponsor


News Feeds

 
Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps
Careers

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.

 

Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 

twitter

 




The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
905 W 7th St #331
Frederick MD 21701
301-620-0784
301-695-1538 - fax