About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents

Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By

Product Reviews
Partner Sites







Spatial Media LLC properties




Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

Vantage Point: Bridging the Digital (Flood Data) Divide Print E-mail
Written by Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM   
Saturday, 02 January 2016

A 184Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

The first Technical Mapping Advisory Council (TMAC) to FEMA noted in its very first report (1996) that embracing the digital environment would improve efficiency in generating, managing, integrating, and distributing flood data. The National Research Council's 2009 report, "Mapping the Zone: Improving Flood Map Accuracy", also stressed the significant advances made possible by a fully digital environment, finding that digital mapping creates opportunity to significantly improve communication of flood hazards and flood risks through maps and web-based products. That report further recommended that FEMA ensure new flood information, revisions, and Letters of Map Change be incorporated into the digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps as soon as they become effective, something that can only be accomplished in a fully digital environment.

The present TMAC has also embraced this view of a digital future and its opportunities to update and disseminate data more rapidly and to present data in different formats for more effective communication with different user groups. At the same time, TMAC recognizes the need to establish accuracy and precision specifications for each layer, and to provide documentation as to source and methodology. Standards for compilation of individual data layers and the information within them may already exist for many of those layers.

Regardless of the benefits of such changes, we must acknowledge that not everyone can fully utilize digital information--or even access it. Some communities in the National Flood Insurance Program have only the most basic of computer hardware, software, and skills. The information-seeking public at large can be in the same or even more computer-challenged situation, and may be confused or feel disenfranchised as a result; public awareness and understanding of flood hazards and flood risks may require additional modes of information delivery. Even technical data users do not always have software compatible with the datasets available, or capability to handle the large data files associated with flood studies.

Such an array of conditions presents challenges regarding the human and technological aspects of a fully digital world as we move toward that endpoint. This is true no matter what kind of data we are talking about, but particularly in a nationwide program affecting so many individuals and businesses. The following list of considerations may specify floodplain data, but are pertinent when building any system for digital data storage and distribution:
• Access to information: We must acknowledge the varied abilities or lack of ability for non-technical stakeholders to access data, much less use it. For these stakeholders, there must be an alternate means of access, whether by non-digital media or perhaps through viewers that can be used off-line. For more technical constituents, other factors pertain. While transparency and accessibility are critical, how do we protect the integrity of core data? Should all data be open to everyone? How much access to data is to be provided? To whom should access be open, to which data, and to what depth within the database?
• Usefulness to stakeholders: The world changes, and so does its floodplains. Is the new data/product better (more detailed, more precise, more accurate, more understandable) than what exists? Does it answer needs of users? Does it address multiple needs (mitigation planning, evacuation routing, siting of critical facilities, etc.)? Credibility is critical for implementing, enforcing, and accepting floodplain management decisions. Do stakeholders understand--and believe--the reasons for changes to flood zone designation or extent (horizontal and/or vertical)?
• Public education and outreach: Some stakeholders, especially non-technical property owners, may resist the alldigital display of flood risks. Others may believe that anything appearing on a computer screen is error-free. For these (and other) reasons, FEMA's efforts in reaching various user groups must be ongoing and evolve as products and methods of presentation change.
• Appropriate and acceptable uses of data: Not all data is of the same level of accuracy, and therefore it is not reliable or appropriate for all intended uses. Users, both technical and non-technical, must be informed and educated regarding data quality and limitations. Full documentation of data accuracy should be available both inside and outside of metadata for better recognition by all users.
• Legal equivalence of different formats: Do different formats carry the same legal weight, or do modifications/ extracts change that? While some products are clearly identified (such as the note in the title block of every FIRMette created on FEMA's Map Service Center website), not all are.
• Timeliness of data/product availability: How is notification of changes accomplished? When are changes distributed? What are repercussions of timing? The timeliness of data and product availability and coordination of digital data availability and distribution directly affect community floodplain management and welfare.
• Consistency and stability: Should data be usable for a predictable period of time? Currently it changes all the time. Tracking versions is important to document both the effective date and the specific information altered, added, or deleted between versions.
• Modifications of procedures: Every change in procedure has a direct impact on data users, particularly as projects may be in progress when the modifications are announced or become effective. Thus a clear plan for the roll out of procedural modifications to avoid confusion is imperative, with no retroactive application.
• Proprietary versus public domain models and products: Various users encounter difficulties when faced with proprietary models and/or products. Some technical users may want to modify models to better accommodate and reflect local conditions but are unable to do so. Electronic data should be available in generic form to accommodate those communities and others without infrastructure, hardware, software, and/ or expertise to use digital information in the currently available forms.
• Consistency of models: Different models can yield different results. For consistency in use of models, FEMA should provide guidance on selection of appropriate models under various circumstances.
• Costs of transitioning to a fully digital environment: While the long-term view shows us the possibilities for cost savings in data acquisition, analysis, dissemination, and storage, immediate costs are far from negligible. Stakeholders can begin to prepare their documents and data to be integrated into a seamless national system if fully informed of incremental steps toward that goal.

This topic and many others are addressed in detail in the current TMAC's Annual Report. Look for it (and TMAC's report on Future Conditions) on FEMA's website at http://www.fema.gov/technical-mappingadvisory-council

Wendy Lathrop is licensed as a Professional Land Surveyor in NJ, PA, DE, and MD, and has been involved since 1974 in surveying projects ranging from construction to boundary to environmental land use disputes. She is a Professional Planner in NJ, and a Certified Floodplain Manager through ASFPM.

A 184Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

< Prev   Next >

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Thought Leader: Land is Too Important to Be Left to Land Specialists
A while back I was searching the Internet for an old treatise on land titles. A Google query yielded a book published in 1914. The author was Charles Claudius Kagey and the book was titled "Land Survey and Land Titles, a book for boys and girls, a reference volume for property owners, a text ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Wacker vs. Price - Irony in Sevenfold
This month's case takes us to Phoenix, Arizona in 1950. The Arizona Supreme Court went all guns-a-blazin' in Wacker vs. Price (216 P.2d 707 (Ariz. 1950)). Maybe it's just me, but I'm sensing plenty of irony and have taken license to point it out along the way. I like what the Court did with this case ....
Read the Article
Allen E. Cheves 
Around the Bend - A Visit to Carlson Software
The Ohio River is one of America's greatest, running near 1,000 miles between Pittsburgh and the Mighty Mississippi. Much of the coal and other products that fueled our nation's industrial expansion flowed between the shores of this maritime ....
Read the Article
Lee Lovell, PS 
Surveying & Mapping Economics Part 3 - Customers & Services
This article continues an inquiry into the economic conditions of the Surveying and Mapping industry (NAICS 541370) using data from the U.S. Census Bureau. This time we will look at customers and services. The data comes from the Economic Census conducted every 5 years on American ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
True Elevation: Black Elk Peak
Black Elk Peak, located in the Black Hills region of South Dakota, is the state's highest natural point. It is frequently referred to as the highest summit in the United States east of the Rocky Mountains. Two other peaks, Guadalupe Peak in Texas and ....
Read the Article
Larry Trojak 
Bringing The Goods - Mobile Scanning an Integral Component
When Jim Smith, Jerrad Burns and Charlie Patton left the Memphis division of a major construction company in 2015, they took with them the knowledge of how to get even the most complex jobs done and what equipment could best serve them in making that happen. So when they joined West ....
Read the Article
Lee Lovell, PS 
Test Yourself 41: Integers, Integers, and Integers
ABF is a 5:12:13 triangle, ACF is a 48:55:73 triangle, ADF is a 3:4:5 triangle, and AEF is a 7:24:25 triangle, all with integer sides and inscribed in a semi-circle. What are the lengths of BC, CD, and DE? ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Sunset or Sunrise?
While we often think of legislated government programs as static, they do change over time. Such evolution and opportunity for transformation are part of the dialogue in reauthorizing these programs. Every so many years there is a sunset on each government program, and this September is the ....
Read the Article


Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
contact Amerisurv


JAVAD Intros
Spoofer Buster

press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content


News Feeds

Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.


Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 



The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
905 W 7th St #331
Frederick MD 21701
301-695-1538 - fax