About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents

Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By

Product Reviews
Partner Sites







Spatial Media LLC properties




Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

The HP 35s Calculator—A Field Surveyor's Companion: Part 7—Adjustment Print E-mail
Written by Jason E. Foose, PS   
Sunday, 05 April 2015

A 276Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

The current price range of the HP35s is $50-$60 in the United States. In 1972 a new HP35 cost $395. Adjusting $395 to 42 years of inflation equates to about $2,200 according to internet fodder. Going backwards, $60 in 2014 bucks equates to about $10.75 in 1972. It's no big secret that electronics are really cheap now-a-days and who really cares? Well, I do! I'm teaching you how to wring every single dime out of a $60 dollar black box that is really worth $2,200. Our next few programs require your elbow grease to squeeze the lemonade out of the old black box.

This Month's Program

Why do we even bother to adjust our surveys if our modern measuring capabilities are ridiculously precise to begin with? Least squares network adjustment will resolve the most probable statistical value of measurements and positions. That type of adjustment truly improves consistency of expectations when comparing positional values. Positive applications include baseline networks and level networks. Contrary to our judicial function as boundary retracement surveyors, the objective of control work is resolving the most absolute positional value for a particular station. For example as in the NGS case the station mark itself is subordinate to the values assigned, adjusted, published, updated, and republished as the geodesy is refined. I really don't think that Michael Dennis and Dave Minkel sneak out at night with a hammer and bang every mark on the continent over a smidge. Of course not, they simply report the updated adjustment values which lend the appearance of a "floating" mark to us dirt surveyors. I can assure you that NGS marks are very static and don't "move"! However, when introducing NGS control into a network, the expectation is to adjust the physical measurement between control points to the known adjusted control values. That is somewhat contrary to our expectations as boundary retracement surveyors. We most often and comfortably report varying measurements between legal corners and place our emphasis on the evidentiary value of a position as controlling rather than the mathematically derived coordinate. {If you feel any challenge to my last statement please unsubscribe from The American Surveyor. You are not practicing Land Surveying. You are engaging in some sub professional measurement exercise and you are a FRAUD!!!}.

Our predecessors did not necessarily seek to resolve the most probable statistical value of a position but rather aimed to accurately identify the location of legal evidence. Their purpose for adjusting measurements was to promote consistency for retracement rather than a truly "most probable value". They measured linearly and thus they adjusted measurements linearly. According to "Surveying" by Davis, Foote, and Rayner circa 1928, "Many surveyors, however, rely upon their own judgment, in large measure disregarding any established rule, and arbitrarily distribute the error in accordance with their estimation of the difficulties met in the field. Manifestly, if certain courses are over rough ground, the error of chaining these courses would be expected to be relatively large, and the correction to the observed distance should be correspondingly great; also when sights are steep and visibility is poor, larger angular errors would be expected than where conditions of observing are more nearly ideal, and hence in balancing the survey it is fair to assume that the larger changes in direction should be in the courses where conditions surrounding the observations were relatively unfavorable." It should be apparent that the quest for the absolute mechanical position of a point is of little relevance in retracement work. However, employing the compass rule adjustment simply provides a consistent method to distribute error through your measurements.

Compass Rule can logically be applied to aid in recovery of evidence when a consistent difference is noted between plat reports and observed measures. Where original subdivision lines were physically run the difference between the physical end points and the platted positions could be prorated through the line points. The thought being that accumulated field error was accepted on the ground but not accounted for on the plat. This computation may lead the retracement surveyor closer to the original evidence of the work as laid out on the ground. Frederick W. Boreman P.S. 6855 (Ohio) used to say "Jase, they're like clams. When one coughs, it gives them all away." (see Figure 1)

The benefits of least squares adjustments are negligible if not perhaps misleading (too good for the intended purpose) when applied to modern retracement survey work. The compass rule method is well suited to retracement efforts because of its simplicity and repeatability. It is quite a simple premise: any error is proportionally distributed to every measurement in a lineal set according to each measure's magnitude. Traversing is linear and stations are generally physically dependent upon only the adjoining stations. When measurements are made with consistency they are considered equal in weight so there's little if no need to apply any sort of arbitrary or statistical weighting.

Please do not hesitate to send any comments, concerns, questions, or criticism to This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

The Program
Program B: Compass Rule Traverse Adjustment

This program is very dependent on the order and format of the traverse entry. The objective is to get the foresight point number to match the input leg number. The reasoning is that the program operates on a loop counter and requires sequential addressing with the order of the legs as entered. Traverse legs will be overwritten by the values of the computed coordinates as they are addressed to the same register. This may take some rearranging on your part or a change in field numbering discipline. Remember to enter azimuths/ angles in decimal degrees. Final report of angles and azimuths is in DMS format.

Example Data and Running The Program
Create a traverse sketch and use field notes to construct a data table like the examples below. Raw coordinate values are listed to demonstrate differences but are not apparent while running the routine. Raw coordinates are computed by simply assuming the backsight azimuth of N35E between points 4 and 5 and simply running around the polygon. The program uses the statistical accumulator and registers. Access  registers through keystrokes  BRS  - for the "SUMS" menu.

Continued Online…
Due to the length of this month’s program listing, please refer to the online PDF at http://bit.ly/1Qp2mUU.

Did You Know?
Do you actually know the name of the division symbol? You know, the minus sign wedged between a colon? Well apparently Bill Gates forgot to put it in my Microsoft Office Suite so I set sail in that ocean of knowledge we call the internet. I found that the division symbol is named "obelus" and is available in MS Windows through keystrokes Alt+0247 on the keypad ÷ there, see I just did it! I'll do it again ÷ this is fun ÷ oh, BTW, sorry Bill I stand corrected!

Polecat of the Month
Mark E. Hummel, hailing from a certain un-named city holding six Superbowl titles and the rings to prove it, pointed out that Line I021 of the January 2015 Inverse Routine should include the keystroke .EQN.. Mark Hummel's great catch is second only to Franco Harris' Immaculate Reception in Iron City lore. Thanks Mark for pointing it out!

Jason Foose is the County Surveyor of Mohave County Arizona. He has been licensed for  441,504,000 seconds...no wait, 441,504,001 seconds...no wait, 441,504,002 seconds...

A 276Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

< Prev   Next >

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Marc Cheves, PS 
Editorial: A Great Year to be a Surveyor
Some magazines have what are called "theme" issues. That is, most of the content is focused on one particular subject. In my 22+ years of survey magazine publishing, my philosophy has always been to have a little bit of everything in each issue, thereby eliminating the possibility that ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Case Examinations: Halverson v. Deerwood Village
Whew! We really beat the snot out of Bryant v. Blevins and practical locations. Well this month we're back on new case that hit the Minnesota Supreme Court's docket in 1982. We've got the familiar gymnastics of jurisprudence featuring an extraordinary array of flying rope stretchers ...
Read the Article
Michel Philips 
Extreme Environment Surveying
A Franco-Chilean team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 rugged handheld for marine cave surveying, gathering data to classify the inaccessible northern half of Madre de Dios for UNESCO World Heritage. The team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 ....
Read the Article
Erik Dahlberg 
The Original Green Engineers
Sometimes, it's best just to leave things as you found them. That's the lesson shared by Dr. Richard Miksad and his students at the University of Virginia. As a result of studies covering nearly a decade, Miksad's teams have developed detailed ....
Read the Article
Dave Lindell, PS 
Test Yourself 49: No Dimensions
In square A-C-D-B with side S, C-E is tangent to the semicircle Q1 with diameter B-D. Q2 is the inscribed circle of A-C-E. The tangent to Q1 and Q2 meets the sides of the square at F and H and intersects C-E at t G. Q3 is the inscribed circle of C-G-H. What is the ratio of the radii of circles ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
Discovery on Grizzly Peak
When First Lieutenant Montgomery M. Macomb arrived in Carson City, Nevada, from Washington D.C., on July 28, 1878, his assigned survey crew from the 4th Artillery was waiting and ready for the new field season. At age 25, Macomb was the leader ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Fighting City Hall Over Land
Once upon a time (1989 to be exact) in a place not so far away from where I live, a man (Francis Galdo) bought a home across the street from a vacant parcel owned by the City of Philadelphia. That parcel, along with others, had been acquired by condemnation back in 1974 subsequent to a 1956 ....
Read the Article
Patrick C. Garner, PS 
Book Review: Boundary Retracement: Processes and Procedures
When I was in my mid-twenties and learning the honorable profession of land surveying, I was lucky to be guided by a mentor who would grab a book off his office shelf and say, "Every surveyor should have a copy of this!" The first example he waved at me was Davis, Foote and Kelly's Surveying ....
Read the Article


Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
contact Amerisurv


Carlson SurvCE &
SurvPC 6 Available

press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content


News Feeds

Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.


Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 



The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
7820B Wormans Mill Road, #236
Frederick MD 21701
301-695-1538 - fax