About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents
 
advertisement


Subscriptions
Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
     RTN
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By


Product Reviews
Partner Sites

machinecontrolonline 


lbszone.com

GISuser.com

GeoJobs.biz

GeoLearn

 

Spatial Media LLC properties

Associates

ASPRS

newsnow 

Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

Product Review: Javad Triumph-LS Print E-mail
Written by Shawn Billings, PS   
Friday, 02 January 2015

A 5.746Mb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

In June of 2013, Marc Cheves, my friend and editor asked me to cover a product announcement by Javad GNSS in San Jose, California. Javad and his team can be credited with countless advancements in GNSS precise positioning over the past 30 years, but I was unprepared for what I experienced upon my arrival. Rather than meeting an elite academic, I found Javad to be incredibly down-to-earth. In spite of his numerous innovations, he seldom looks back on those past achievements, seemingly fixated on creating new technologies to make precision GNSS even better. I also found that, together with Javad's storied success, he is also a gifted teacher, and has the ability to break complicated subjects down to understandable concepts. Lastly, and perhaps most significant to this story and review, Javad likes surveyors. I don't quite understand why he is so devoted to surveyors, but he is. He has made considerable investments of time, energy and money to understand the unique needs of conscientious surveyors and developing hardware and software that meets those needs. When we first spoke, he admitted that although his gear had always established the state-of-the-art, his software had not. To address this, he landed on the idea of bringing together a small group of licensed surveyors—all experienced in the use of GNSS--to teach him what was important to American surveyors and why.

Upon our arrival, guests were introduced to mockups and the magnesium skeletal frame of the Triumph-LS, Javad's latest flagship product. The highlights of the design specifications called for an 864 channel all-in-one GNSS receiver. While an impressive feat, to be sure, I wondered, "What could the possible benefit of 864 channels be for tracking less than 30 visible satellites?" Javad's 30 years of success suggested he deserved the benefit of the doubt. His answer: 864 channels allow the receiver to listen to each signal (GPS C/A, P1, P2, L2C , L5; GLONASS C/A, L1, L2, L3, L2C; Galileo E1, E5A, E5B, AltBoc; Beidou B1, B2; and QZSS L1C, L2C, L5 and SBAS L1, L5) with multiple independent channels (like several ears listening to the same whisper). One hundred of the 864 channels listen for in-band interference from sources such as cellular, FM, AM, TV, airport, military, civilian, etc. When I asked him about the radical departure from the conventional rover/data collector, he explained that the all-in-one is more portable, with forward pointing compass/camera sensors, a unique heads-up operation (both of which are the foundational to Visual Stakeout and pixelated angle measurement), tilt compensation and one battery pack for everything.

The Triumph-LS is not Javad's first attempt at an all-in-one receiver. The Triumph-VS was the bellwether for this type of configuration, but tepid acceptance in the US showed this format has yet to prove itself. I left that first meeting in San Jose still skeptical about the concept—until I used it. What I found was that the box-on-a-stick approach is very appealing. Using the supplied monopod, I could collapse the pole and place the entire rover system in the floorboard of a small car. Walking across a large site proved to be much more comfortable with the compact receiver and pole over my shoulder than the more conventional two meter pole, receiver head and data collector. Navigating through underbrush was much easier with the collapsed monopod and clean receiver than with a gangly two meter pole, bracket and external UHF antenna dangling from it. After a couple of weeks of use I found the configuration to be very compelling. In conversations with other test-group surveyors, I've heard similar conversion stories: skepticism, giving way to acceptance, leading to enthusiastic approval. Ergonomically, no more sore back after long days of RTK topographic surveying—and added to improved comfort, a new set of features: Lift and Tilt (hands free start/stop point collection), Tilt compensation, and Guide stake out.

Included with the Triumph-LS: 864 GNSS channel, single chip receiver with six parallel RTK engines, internal radio modem (UHF or Spread Spectrum), two internal GSM SIM card slots (supporting the ability to easily switch between two carriers), internal Spectrum analyzer (identifies presence of interference to GNSS signals), internal UHF scanner, two cameras (one pointing to nadir, one pointing forward), internal tilt sensors, internal compass, WiFi, Bluetooth, two USB ports (host and client), optional RS-232 serial port, microSD card slot, LED flashlight, 20 hour run time on a single charge (with the optional second internal battery), 16 gigabyte internal memory, a brilliant, 4.3 inch, capacitive touchscreen, protected by Dragontrail glass, and Windows Compact 7 operating system.

The six parallel RTK engines are retained from the Triumph-VS, but are used in a more sophisticated way in the Triumph-LS with J-Field data collection software. Each of the six RTK engines constantly work independently to obtain and maintain a fixed, centimeter-level position, and each one uses slightly different parameters and assumptions in its algorithms, and when more than one is fixed, J-Field uses a weighted average of each fixed engine to compute a position. This allows for some fantastic features in the field. For years conscientious surveyors have understood that observations to obstructed or critical points required (at a minimum) observing the point with a fixed solution, resetting the engine and returning to the point with a new fix and comparing them, with the assumption being that it is unlikely for an RTK processor to provide the same wrong fix more than once. The LS does this automatically both faster and with more statistical robustness with Auto-Verify with V6 resets.

Auto-Verify with v6 resets employs a two-step approach to observing a point and provides impressive confidence in a single observation of a point. In Phase 1 of an observation, J-Field waits for an engine to fix, notes the position, and forces the engine to reset. This process repeats continuously for all six engines until the user defined number of independent engine fixes has been met. This could be a low number (less than ten) or a large number (more than 100), depending on the confidence the user desires and the amount of time he is willing to wait. While the LS can fix in very difficult environments, more time is required to fix in these areas than in open areas. During Phase 1, if two or more engine fixes disagree with one another, J-Field temporarily holds both positions until additional engine fixes prove one or both to be incorrect and then the errant fix is discarded from the point average. Once Phase 1 is complete, the software moves to Phase 2 in which the engines are no longer forced to reset and are allowed to contribute additional epochs to the average until the total epoch count is satisfied. Rather than the good practice of getting two or three positions with independent fixes, J-Field proves the point reliability by repeating the fix numerous times and automatically including each valid fix in the final position.

Slightly less rigorous (and faster) is the Auto-Verify without v6 resets which uses a single Phase and a different metric called the consistency level. The consistency level is a unitless value that advances with each epoch so long as the epoch is based on two or more fixed engines. Two engines advance the counter slowly, while six engines advance very quickly. This works well for sites with varying conditions. Generally in marginal areas the LS will fix with fewer engines, while in the open it will generally fix all six engines. A point collected with Auto-Verify without v6 resets in an obstructed area will require more time on site automatically than a point in an open area. For example, a point collected with two engines fixed and consistency level set to 10, requires 100 seconds on-point. With six engines fixed this can be done in less than 10 seconds. Intuitively, J-Field adjusts the time on site in this mode based on the engines' ability to fix.

One last point regarding multiple engines, the user can specify the minimum number of engines required to be fixed before allowing a point to be collected. I like a minimum setting of two fixed engines as this provides some assurance that the fix I am relying on has been minimally tested with a second fix.

Between the 864 channels and the six parallel RTK engines, the LS tracks in some miserable places for GNSS surveying. Accuracy is diminished as a result of multipath and non-line-of-sight signals in really difficult environments. This is an inescapable consequence of physics, and because the signals are distorted before reaching the receiver, it is impossible to correct them. At best, the receiver can carefully determine (in the presence of multipath) which signal is the right one and which are reflections. In the case of non-line-of-sight signals (reflections only without the direct line of sight signal) the best the receiver can do is recognize the presence of this signal and disregard it. With that said, I was impressed with the places the LS could good fixed positions. In suitable places for GNSS surveying the LS provided very precise results, so long as I was careful in my procedure. The scatter plots and statistics that are shown with every shot provide excellent detail and can even help an experienced surveyor recognize the presence of multipath.

Collection of points and lines is fast and simple. The interface is highly customizable. In the main collection and stake screens (referred to as the Action screen), there is a series of four white buttons on each side of the map. These buttons can be assigned by the user to display all sorts of information and actions. In Collect, a button can be set for the point name (alpha-numeric names are supported), point description, code, attributes, Tag, RMS values, base/rover status, rod height, and for immediately attaching photos to a point (and others). Stake offers white boxes for DTT (distance to target), CTT (course to target), right, left, ahead and back, delta N and E, and Cut/ Fill (and others). Many surveyors use only point numbers and descriptions, opting not to create line work in the field. J-Field supports this type of surveying. Simply set a white box to "point name" and another to "description." At any time, a user can add more advanced features such as tags and codes and attributes or continue to survey with point names and descriptions for the entirety of his career.

For those that like to build maps in the field, J-Field supports code free line work generation: Press the button labeled "Point" and change the collection to "Line." All subsequent points will be connected as a line. Press the same button again and change the collection to "Curve" to build simple arcs. Curve collection is ingenious: Set the curve counter to build a curve using 3 or more (n). No more PC, PT coding, J-Field does it automatically and the "Curve" button updates to tell you which n point you are about to locate along the curve. Codes in J-Field operate as GIS feature codes with user assignable attributes. A point could have a user-defined code for "boundary" with user-defined attributes for monument type, size, found/set, ID cap, etc. Codes also act as AutoCAD layers at export, so a line collected with code "boundary" will be exported in layer "boundary".

Tags in J-Field control connectivity of points and can be thought of as line names. All of the points collected under the Tag name "EP" would be connected by a series of lines and curves until that polyline is ended. If you want to begin a new line at an existing point or continue the current line through an existing point, simply select that point from the map (no need to remember point numbers) and J-Field will draw the currently active line from the point (if the line is new) or through the point (if the line has already been started) and continue adding collected segments beyond it.

Stake out handles staking of points and lines. Lines can be staked by particular stations and offsets or can be staked at random intervals. Point staking is helped substantially by the "Guide" feature, which shows the point being staked superimposed on the live image from the front facing camera. No more guessing at the direction to a point, line it up in the live video screen and start moving.

Base/Rover setup in J-Field is the simplest I have ever used. Initially, the procedure for base setup was torturous. Javad's development team has been extremely fast at responding to user requests, particularly from his PLS team. The PLS team made recommendations to make this better and the development team went to work. Now the procedure is smooth and lightning fast. Javad insists that using a local base is better than remote network solutions, and I am inclined to agree. The LS will work with corrections from Real Time Networks with good results, but fix times and precision are markedly improved with a local base. Pairing the Triumph-LS with the miniature Triumph-2 and an external base radio modem makes for a great package. The Base/Rover setup routine configures the base modem and rover modem simultaneously (no chance of setting the base frequency, or message type differently from the rover). The position sent to the base is compared against the running autonomous position of the base and the difference reported to the user, something I've never seen another software do. The likelihood of selecting the wrong base coordinate is reduced immensely with this feature. The LS's UHF scanner can be employed in Base/Rover setup to scan all of the frequencies in the user's frequency library to find a clear channel.

COGO is incredibly sophisticated. Few survey software developers have a geodesist on staff, much less a team of geodesists. Javad's team of geodesists insist on creating geodetically pure software for his users. Nowhere is this more apparent than in COGO. Inverse between two points, and at the touch of a button, the user can view the Grid bearing, Geodetic bearing, or magnetic bearing between two points. Similarly, a distance can be related to Grid, Ground, Geodetic (along the ellipsoid) or Slant (mark to mark slope distance). When the user creates a point at some direction and distance from a point, he can select the type of direction and distance to use. This same adherence to geodetic purity is even applied to the internal compass. At all times in Collect and Stake, the compass direction is shown and is automatically corrected for magnetic declination and for grid convergence when applicable. Point averaging is extraordinarily robust. Average two or more surveyed points together and the software weights the average by the error estimates of each point and the result is not only a coordinate point but a vector with newly created error estimates as well.

Internally—and transparent to the user—all surveyed points are stored in WGS84(ITRF2008). These points are transformed and projected on the fly to whatever coordinate system the user wants: State Plane, UTM, Geodetic, several statewide county-level LDP systems, or hundreds of other predefined systems across the world, not to mention support for custom projections. However, at the core, all surveyed coordinates are stored in the database as ITRF2008 latitude, longitude and ellipsoid height. This helps to future proof the user's data. As new coordinate systems and adjustments become available, the coordinates can be transformed by translations and velocities to these new systems.

Javad's J-Field software also offers a new concept to many surveyors: Pages. Each project in J-Field is given ten Pages which can be thought of as sub-projects. The user is free to employ pages however he or she may choose, perhaps placing imported data in one page, primary control in another, project design data in another, and topographic data in yet another. Of course, a surveyor could choose to keep all of her data in a single page and not get mired by the concept. But for a savvy surveyor, Pages can offer a lot of help in organization of his or her data for a complex project.

Data export is customizable and covers everything a surveyor might need, from simple text file export, to dwg, dxf, shape and LandXML, to vector file export (NGS G-File and user-defined). Export to a thumb drive plugged into the USB port and then easily import that data into a third party data collector or vice versa. Use vector file export to adjust RTK vectors in a desktop least squares program. While the software may still need improvement in some areas, I have seen that when Javad's team focuses their energy on a feature, they consistently surpass expectations. At the time of this writing, collecting points by offset still needs some work, mostly in overall simplification, and there are a number of exciting features in development—such as Verify Base, which performs an adjustment of surveyed points tied to an autonomous base position after the base station raw data is processed to NGS CORS in Javad's DPOS positioning service.

Javad and his team have created a device that turns conventional wisdom on its head, rethinking field surveying from the ground up. Increasingly, while working in the field, using some proprietary routine, I recall that "Javad and I talked at length about this feature." I smile, realizing that he insisted when I first met him that he should embark on this new software rather than adhering to the status quo by putting existing software in the LS, and now I believe it has been for the best. Javad has a long history of introducing alien technology that eventually becomes main stream. The Triumph-LS will be no different. I have found the form factor captivating. It is far more comfortable to use in the field with its collapsible monopod than anything else I've ever used. The hardware provides a platform for receiving corrections from most any source with the ability to verify that the positions it provides are reliable by use of its v6 RTK engines. The software has been heavily influenced and tested by real surveyors and offers features no other platform does. Coupled with the pocketsized Triumph-2 as a base, an entire RTK base/rover system can be fitted into a small duffel bag, and can be had for about $20k. The Triumph-LS is supported by a detailed manual authored and edited by experienced American surveyors, and a new message board and support team provide quick, free access to knowledgeable users.

Shawn Billings is a licensed land surveyor in east Texas and works for Billings surveying and Mapping Company, which was established in 1983 by his father, J. D. Billings. Together they perform surveys for boundary retracement, sewer and water infrastructure routes, and land development.

A 5.746Mb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

 
< Prev   Next >

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Marc Cheves, PS 
Editorial: A Great Year to be a Surveyor
Some magazines have what are called "theme" issues. That is, most of the content is focused on one particular subject. In my 22+ years of survey magazine publishing, my philosophy has always been to have a little bit of everything in each issue, thereby eliminating the possibility that ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Case Examinations: Halverson v. Deerwood Village
Whew! We really beat the snot out of Bryant v. Blevins and practical locations. Well this month we're back on new case that hit the Minnesota Supreme Court's docket in 1982. We've got the familiar gymnastics of jurisprudence featuring an extraordinary array of flying rope stretchers ...
Read the Article
Michel Philips 
Extreme Environment Surveying
A Franco-Chilean team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 rugged handheld for marine cave surveying, gathering data to classify the inaccessible northern half of Madre de Dios for UNESCO World Heritage. The team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 ....
Read the Article
Erik Dahlberg 
The Original Green Engineers
Sometimes, it's best just to leave things as you found them. That's the lesson shared by Dr. Richard Miksad and his students at the University of Virginia. As a result of studies covering nearly a decade, Miksad's teams have developed detailed ....
Read the Article
Dave Lindell, PS 
Test Yourself 49: No Dimensions
In square A-C-D-B with side S, C-E is tangent to the semicircle Q1 with diameter B-D. Q2 is the inscribed circle of A-C-E. The tangent to Q1 and Q2 meets the sides of the square at F and H and intersects C-E at t G. Q3 is the inscribed circle of C-G-H. What is the ratio of the radii of circles ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
Discovery on Grizzly Peak
When First Lieutenant Montgomery M. Macomb arrived in Carson City, Nevada, from Washington D.C., on July 28, 1878, his assigned survey crew from the 4th Artillery was waiting and ready for the new field season. At age 25, Macomb was the leader ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Fighting City Hall Over Land
Once upon a time (1989 to be exact) in a place not so far away from where I live, a man (Francis Galdo) bought a home across the street from a vacant parcel owned by the City of Philadelphia. That parcel, along with others, had been acquired by condemnation back in 1974 subsequent to a 1956 ....
Read the Article
Patrick C. Garner, PS 
Book Review: Boundary Retracement: Processes and Procedures
When I was in my mid-twenties and learning the honorable profession of land surveying, I was lucky to be guided by a mentor who would grab a book off his office shelf and say, "Every surveyor should have a copy of this!" The first example he waved at me was Davis, Foote and Kelly's Surveying ....
Read the Article

deliciousrssnewsletterlinkedinfacebooktwitter

Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
please
contact Amerisurv


Google
 
AMERISURV TOP NEWS

Javad Intros
Total Solution

GOT NEWS? Send To
press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content

Sponsor


News Feeds

 
Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps
Careers

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.

 

Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 

twitter

 




The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
7820B Wormans Mill Road, #236
Frederick MD 21701
301-620-0784
301-695-1538 - fax