About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents

Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By

Product Reviews
Partner Sites







Spatial Media LLC properties




Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

Vantage Point: Unseating Mineral Claims Print E-mail
Written by Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM   
Friday, 14 November 2014

A 139Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

Sometimes one piece of news relates to another in a chance encounter that makes both stand out more than they might separately, as happened in May of this year. One is ongoing as an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court regarding what is called "title washing" in this state relating to gas, oil, and mineral claims, and that's the topic I'll focus on today. The other May event was FEMA's issuance of a policy regarding floodplain acquisitions with Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) funds. Properties that have "oil, gas, and other mineral encumbrances that may allow hydraulic fracturing/HDD [horizontal directional drilling] to occur" are not eligible for buyouts. FEMA Mitigation Policy FP 302-405-146-1 prohibits all such postacquisition activities as well.

Back to Topic One, which requires a little background in Pennsylvania titles. Those working in states with Marketable Title Acts (requiring re-recordation of interests within legislated time frames to keep them active and valid) may see some similarity in the legal outcomes. Such laws try to "clear" titles with simple expediency as the primary objective. Herder Spring Hunting Club v. Harry and Anna Keller (93 A.3d 465, May 2014) illustrates one of the pitfalls.

An abbreviated legislative history sets the stage. Pennsylvania has long categorized property for tax purposes as "seated" (containing permanent improvements) or "unseated" (unoccupied and unimproved). An 1806 Act addressed only surface subdivisions, but landowners making horizontal severances of subsurface interests must also notify the county commissioners or county tax board so that proper tax assessments can be levied against surface and subsurface interests separately. Of course, such transactions must also be memorialized in recorded deeds.

Seated lands were assessed in the name of the owners but unseated lands were assessed by survey or warrant number. Assessors are not required to search chain of title. Therefore, without a statement of subsurface rights within a year of conveyance, any unseated lands valued as a whole (surface and subsurface rights together) would be seized and sold as a whole, clearing and "washing" the title, subject to a two-year window for a disseized owner to prove severance rights. This has led to problems over time, as purchasers often started improving unseated lands bought at tax sale within that two-year limit, but that's a different difficult story.

Harry and Anna Keller sold the surface rights to their land in Centre County in 1899, specifically including in the recorded deed a lengthy paragraph excepting and reserving "all the coal, stone, fire clay, iron ore and other minerals of whatever kind, oil and natural gas lying or being, or which may now or hereafter be formed or contained" in or upon the land, including rights to enter to extract these materials and build such facilities as necessary to do so. But there is no record that the Kellers ever notified the commissioners or assessors of this severance, and so the surface and subsurface rights of the unseated lands were treated as a whole during the 1935 tax seizure and subsequent 1941 tax sale. In 1959, Herder Spring Hunting Club investigated the property, and took title "subject to all exceptions and reservations as are contained in the chain of title" in 1960.

Until the Marcellus Shale boom, all was quiet. Now of course the lure of wealth has changed the title landscape. The Keller heirs successfully argued before the Commonwealth Court that the Hunting Club had constructive notice of the reserved rights, but this May the Superior Court found that at the time of the Club's acquisition, "there were no active exceptions or reservations in the chain of title, the horizontal severance having been extinguished more than one decade earlier"--based on "arcane law" repealed in 1961. In a nearly apologetic remand requiring award of subsurface rights to the Hunting Club, the Superior Court states, "we are aware that our resolution of this matter is at odds with modern legal concepts. This resolution may be seen as being unduly harsh. However, at the time of the relevant transactions--the [1935] seizure of the property for failure to pay tax and the subsequent [1941] Treasurer's sale - this was the appropriate answer. We do not believe it proper to reach back, more than three score years, to apply a modern sensibility and thereby undo that which was legally done."

Title washing has an unsavory history in Pennsylvania, a practice used and abused by the leather industry in particular: owners of unseated lands wanting the mineral rights sometimes purposely allowed tax seizure, buying back the lands "whole" at the legally prescribed rate of four times the unpaid assessments. But the moral of today's story is that merely reading the chain of title may not tell us who actually owns various interests in land. There may be other laws, past or present, that have significant relevance to unscrambling ownership of rights.
Wendy Lathrop is licensed as a Professional Land Surveyor in NJ, PA, DE, and MD, and has been involved since 1974 in surveying projects ranging from construction to boundary to environmental land use disputes. She is a Professional Planner in NJ, and a Certified Floodplain Manager through ASFPM.

A 139Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

< Prev   Next >

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Marc Cheves, PS 
Editorial: A Great Year to be a Surveyor
Some magazines have what are called "theme" issues. That is, most of the content is focused on one particular subject. In my 22+ years of survey magazine publishing, my philosophy has always been to have a little bit of everything in each issue, thereby eliminating the possibility that ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Case Examinations: Halverson v. Deerwood Village
Whew! We really beat the snot out of Bryant v. Blevins and practical locations. Well this month we're back on new case that hit the Minnesota Supreme Court's docket in 1982. We've got the familiar gymnastics of jurisprudence featuring an extraordinary array of flying rope stretchers ...
Read the Article
Michel Philips 
Extreme Environment Surveying
A Franco-Chilean team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 rugged handheld for marine cave surveying, gathering data to classify the inaccessible northern half of Madre de Dios for UNESCO World Heritage. The team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 ....
Read the Article
Erik Dahlberg 
The Original Green Engineers
Sometimes, it's best just to leave things as you found them. That's the lesson shared by Dr. Richard Miksad and his students at the University of Virginia. As a result of studies covering nearly a decade, Miksad's teams have developed detailed ....
Read the Article
Dave Lindell, PS 
Test Yourself 49: No Dimensions
In square A-C-D-B with side S, C-E is tangent to the semicircle Q1 with diameter B-D. Q2 is the inscribed circle of A-C-E. The tangent to Q1 and Q2 meets the sides of the square at F and H and intersects C-E at t G. Q3 is the inscribed circle of C-G-H. What is the ratio of the radii of circles ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
Discovery on Grizzly Peak
When First Lieutenant Montgomery M. Macomb arrived in Carson City, Nevada, from Washington D.C., on July 28, 1878, his assigned survey crew from the 4th Artillery was waiting and ready for the new field season. At age 25, Macomb was the leader ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Fighting City Hall Over Land
Once upon a time (1989 to be exact) in a place not so far away from where I live, a man (Francis Galdo) bought a home across the street from a vacant parcel owned by the City of Philadelphia. That parcel, along with others, had been acquired by condemnation back in 1974 subsequent to a 1956 ....
Read the Article
Patrick C. Garner, PS 
Book Review: Boundary Retracement: Processes and Procedures
When I was in my mid-twenties and learning the honorable profession of land surveying, I was lucky to be guided by a mentor who would grab a book off his office shelf and say, "Every surveyor should have a copy of this!" The first example he waved at me was Davis, Foote and Kelly's Surveying ....
Read the Article


Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
contact Amerisurv


Sokkia Intros
T-18 Controller

press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content


News Feeds

Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.


Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 



The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
7820B Wormans Mill Road, #236
Frederick MD 21701
301-695-1538 - fax