About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents
 
advertisement


Subscriptions
Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
     RTN
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By


Product Reviews
Partner Sites

machinecontrolonline 


lbszone.com

GISuser.com

GeoJobs.biz

GeoLearn

 

Spatial Media LLC properties

Associates

ASPRS

newsnow 

Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

The Curta Mechanical Pocket Calculator—A History of Survey Computing Print E-mail
Written by Carlton A. Brown   
Wednesday, 10 September 2014

A 1.085Mb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

A Curta mechanical pocket calculator was donated to the Maine Society of Land Surveyors by the estate of John Cothern, and was auctioned off at the 2014 MSLS Scholarship Auction on January 31, 2014. John Cothern was a land surveyor (ME PLS #1006) and it is my understanding that John was a member of the Maine Board of Licensure for Professional Surveyors during the 1990s before he died in 1995.

I first learned of the Curta calculator in the late 1960s through advertisements in Scientific American magazine, but it was not until the auction that I actually saw one in real life. As soon as I took it out of the case and held it in my hand, I knew I had to have it and eventually submitted the winning bid.

In 1972 I graduated from Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh with a civil engineering degree. During my college years I used a slide rule if I only needed 3 significant digits, otherwise I used logarithmic tables and trigonometric tables. I never owned a mechanical calculator while at college. A few months before I graduated in June 1972 I saw for the first time an actual electronic calculator, the four-function Sharp EL-8. In 1974 I finally "found my way" and started working for a company that performed boundary surveys and saw the future in the HP35 electronic calculator that did trigonometric calculations.

The Curta mechanical pocket calculator dominated the market from 1949 until 1972 when electronic calculators with trignonometric functions went on the market. The Curta was the smallest four-function pocket calculator available for sale, but could still calculate to 11 positions with the Curta I model, and to 15 positions with Curta II model. Surveyors were able to carry the Curta in a pocket and use it in the field. One interesting detail is that the Curta was able to add, subtract, multipy and divide, but it did all by just adding! (This was done with a patented contraption called the "complemented step drum".)

Logarithms
Most text books had an appendix of 4 place log tables that could be used when multiplying and dividing or taking exponents. The library had books of 7 place log tables in the reference section for more exacting work.

Trigonometric values were determined most often by using the Coast and Geodetic Special Publication 231 which gave values for natural sine and cosines to eight decimal places (Coast and Geodetic 1942). I owned Jean Peters' book that gave eight place tables for sine, cosine, tangent and cotangent for every second of arc (Peters 1965).

Monroe LN-160X
I saw my first mechanical calculator when I started working in September 1972 for the New Jersey Department of Transportation on a survey crew. Each crew was given a Monroe LN-160X mechanical calculator. My crew used it mostly for reducing topo shots. The procedure was to enter the elevation of the height of instrument into the calculator, then key in a rod reading and subtract it to get the elevation of the first topo point. Next, that same rod reading would be added back in to get the original elevation of HI and the second rod reading would be keyed in and subtracted to get the elevation of the second topo point. It was much quicker and easier than performing the calculations by pencil and paper.

The Monroe LN-160X was much like a laptop in size and use in that it could be used while sitting in the truck, but not used out in the field. It weighed 8 pounds (11 pounds with its protective suitcase) and had dimensions of 12 inches by 10 inches by 5 inches. I used it either on a desk or used the top of the protective suitcase as a table when in the truck.

The first truly portable calculator
If the Monroe could be compared to a laptop, then the Curta could be compared to a calculator. The Curta and its case weighed just 16 ounces and was a cylinder with diameter of 3 inches and height of 4 inches. Users typically would hold the Curta in the left hand, manipulate the place settings with the left fingers and turn the crank with the right hand. The Curta could thus be used out in the field. The Monroe and the Curta could perform the same calculations, but the Curta was definitely easier to use outside the office and probably could do calculations quicker than the Monroe.

The "Curta Collectors and Registry Page" (www.vcalc.net/cu-peo.htm) lists comments made by surveyors of their experiences using a Curta calculator back in the 1950s to 1970s. Some commented that they used the Curta during their licensing exams because the full size office mechanical calculators were too noisy and slide rules were not precise enough. Only the "old timers" used log tables or did multiplications out by pencil and paper. John Fauill from Brookfield Wisconsin stated that he has "...never lost the memory of holding in my left hand the black cylinder that seemed to vibrate with life as my right hand thumb and first finger turned the handle. Both hands worked in unison as the product of complex group of figures were calculated. There was never any need to look at the calculator, eyes focused on the numbers on the paper in front and my mind focused on the silent count with the continuous whirr of the mechanism a constant partner. A true blending of man and machine."

It was not until 1972 that another revolutionary development took place with the advent of the HP-35 calculator, the first scientific electronic pocket calculator that was able to perform trigonometric and exponential functions. The HP-35 eliminated the need for mechanical calculators and books of trig functions, and at 9 ounces was about half the weight of the Curta. The HP-35 signaled the end of the age of mechanical calculators.

Typical usage
Most mechanical calculators would add the numbers entered on the keyboard when the hand crank was turned clockwise and would subtract when the hand crank was turned counterclockwise. The Curta mechanical calculator was different in that the hand crank was always turned clockwise whether adding or subtracting. The reason is that the Curta only used addition even when subtracting!

The Curta was able to do this by turning a subtraction into an addition through the use of a mathmatical "trick" called the nines-complement algorithm. (Note that all electronic calculators and computers that use binary numbers use this same "trick" by turning subtraction into addition using the similar twos-complement algorithm.)

This is best explained through an example:

29l326 minuend
-5798 subtrahend
= 285528 difference

Since the Curta is a 15 digit machine, add zeros to make the example 15 digits:

000000000291326
-000000000005798

The procedure is instead of subtracting the subtrahend, add the nines-complement of the subtrahend. The nines-complement of a number is formed by replacing each digit with nine minus that digit. Thus the nines-complement of the subtrahend of our example is:

000000000005798 subtrahend
999999999994201 nines-complement of the subtrahend

Now add the nines-complement of the subtrahend to the minuend:

000000000291326
+999999999994201
=1000000000285527

Note that the leading "1" (shown in bold red) lies outside the 15 digits, so it is omitted. Also note that the answer (or more precisely, the difference) is "1" short, so add "1" to get the correct answer of "285528".

The Curta used a patented "complemented step drum" in which each digit also had a nines-complement on this drum. Thus when a number was keyed into one of the 11 possible digits, that number would be added when the crank was turned. However, lifting the crank up (to show the red area) and then turning the crank would add the nines-complement.

In the following figure, turning the crank with just a black area showing would add the digit, while turning the crank after first lifting the crank to show the red area would add the nines-complement of the digit.

I believe that there is an advantage in speed and consistency if the crank is turned only clockwise. However, the Curta system also has the advantage of allowing "fast multiplication" to take place as explained in the following example.

All mechanical calculators multiply in the same way by adding as shown in the following example. Assume we want to multiply 144 by 89.

144*89 = 144*(80+9) = 144*80 + 144*9 =
144*10*8 + 144*9 = 1440*8 + 144*9 =
1440+1440+1440+1440+
1440+1440+1440+1440+
144+144+144+144+144+
144+144+144+144 =
12816

With all mechanical calculators, 144 would be keyed in; next the crank would be turned 9 times; next the carriage would be moved one digit over so that 1440 will be added each time we turn the crank; and finally the crank would be turned 8 times. After turning the crank 17 times (9 times and then move the carriage and turn 8 times) we would have 89 shown on the "revolution counter" and 12816 on the "result counter".

The Curta was also able to do "fast muliplication" and in a different procedure would only require 3 crank revolutions instead of 17. In this case we have

144*89 = 144*(100 ­ 11) = 144*(100 ­ 10 ­ 1)

• 144 would be keyed using the setting knobs
• The crank would be pulled up and a subtractive revolution would calculate 144*(-1)
• The carriage would be turned to position 2 and with the pulled up crank a subtractive revolution would calculate 144*(-10)
• The carriage would be turned to position 3, push the crank in the down, addition position and make one additive revolution which calculates 144 * +100.

The Curta would have 89 shown on the "revolution counter" and 12816 on the "result counter" but only 3 crank revolutions would be needed instead of 17. All other mechanical calculators could be used in the same way, but their revolution counter would have shown "111" (the 1 in the tens column would show as red and the one in the units column would show as red) instead of "89".

For a demonstration of square root calculation by the odd numbers subtraction method see the five minute long YouTube video entitled "Square root of 2 on the pepper grinder": youtu.be/haaCoVrGd6k

In conclusion, the Curta Mechanical Calculator would have been the calculator of choice before the advent of the HP-35 calculator, the first scientific electronic pocket calculator that was able to perform trigonometric and exponential functions and which signaled the end of the reign of the Curta mechanical calculator.

References
Curta calculator: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Curta_calculator&oldid=506060125

The Curta Calculator: http://www.vcalc.net/cu.htm#babbage

Peters. Eight-place Tables of Trigonometric Functions for Every Second of Arc. New York: Chelsea Publishing Co, 1965.

U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. Natural Sines And Cosines to Eight Decimal Places. Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1942.

Note: This article is appearing as a three-part series in the New Hampshire Land Surveyors Association newsletter TBM and is reprinted here with permission of the author.

Carlton Brown is an Associate Professor in the Surveying Engineering Technology program at the University of Maine. Information about the program can be found at www.umaine.edu/set/svt.

A 1.085Mb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

 
< Prev

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Marc Cheves, PS 
Editorial: A Great Year to be a Surveyor
Some magazines have what are called "theme" issues. That is, most of the content is focused on one particular subject. In my 22+ years of survey magazine publishing, my philosophy has always been to have a little bit of everything in each issue, thereby eliminating the possibility that ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Case Examinations: Halverson v. Deerwood Village
Whew! We really beat the snot out of Bryant v. Blevins and practical locations. Well this month we're back on new case that hit the Minnesota Supreme Court's docket in 1982. We've got the familiar gymnastics of jurisprudence featuring an extraordinary array of flying rope stretchers ...
Read the Article
Michel Philips 
Extreme Environment Surveying
A Franco-Chilean team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 rugged handheld for marine cave surveying, gathering data to classify the inaccessible northern half of Madre de Dios for UNESCO World Heritage. The team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 ....
Read the Article
Erik Dahlberg 
The Original Green Engineers
Sometimes, it's best just to leave things as you found them. That's the lesson shared by Dr. Richard Miksad and his students at the University of Virginia. As a result of studies covering nearly a decade, Miksad's teams have developed detailed ....
Read the Article
Dave Lindell, PS 
Test Yourself 49: No Dimensions
In square A-C-D-B with side S, C-E is tangent to the semicircle Q1 with diameter B-D. Q2 is the inscribed circle of A-C-E. The tangent to Q1 and Q2 meets the sides of the square at F and H and intersects C-E at t G. Q3 is the inscribed circle of C-G-H. What is the ratio of the radii of circles ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
Discovery on Grizzly Peak
When First Lieutenant Montgomery M. Macomb arrived in Carson City, Nevada, from Washington D.C., on July 28, 1878, his assigned survey crew from the 4th Artillery was waiting and ready for the new field season. At age 25, Macomb was the leader ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Fighting City Hall Over Land
Once upon a time (1989 to be exact) in a place not so far away from where I live, a man (Francis Galdo) bought a home across the street from a vacant parcel owned by the City of Philadelphia. That parcel, along with others, had been acquired by condemnation back in 1974 subsequent to a 1956 ....
Read the Article
Patrick C. Garner, PS 
Book Review: Boundary Retracement: Processes and Procedures
When I was in my mid-twenties and learning the honorable profession of land surveying, I was lucky to be guided by a mentor who would grab a book off his office shelf and say, "Every surveyor should have a copy of this!" The first example he waved at me was Davis, Foote and Kelly's Surveying ....
Read the Article

deliciousrssnewsletterlinkedinfacebooktwitter

Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
please
contact Amerisurv


Google
 
AMERISURV TOP NEWS

Javad Intros
Total Solution

GOT NEWS? Send To
press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content

Sponsor


News Feeds

 
Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps
Careers

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.

 

Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 

twitter

 




The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
7820B Wormans Mill Road, #236
Frederick MD 21701
301-620-0784
301-695-1538 - fax