About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents

Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By

Product Reviews
Partner Sites







Spatial Media LLC properties




Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

Reconnaissance: The Surveyor's Roles & Responsibilities Part 2 Print E-mail
Written by Gary Kent, PS   
Friday, 06 June 2014

A 68Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

In Part One, I explained an initiative by a number of noted professional surveyors from across the country promoting the idea that surveyors should take an active role in the resolution and prevention of boundary disputes. In this column we will explore that idea in more detail.

There are at least two important issues that we need to study. The first is to understand how surveyors unwittingly and unintentionally encourage unrest and even litigation between neighbors. We will discuss that issue in this column. The second is to show surveyors that there are things they can lawfully do to help avoid the first; we will delve into that in my next column.

In addressing the first issue, I repeat the assertion made last time: the average land owner believes that surveyors have the responsibility and authority to determine ownership. We surveyors know this is not true, but we must recognize that clients think it is true! Thus, when we set corners based purely on written title, clients believe we have told them what they own.

I am not convinced that we surveyors need to clarify with clients what our authority regarding ownership actually is--at least at the front end--but we must recognize what they think because that should inform the decisions we make in the course of performing the survey. For example, if our work indicates that the corner will fall 5 feet over the neighbor's fence, I believe we should suspend our work right then. Why? Because it should be patently obvious that `something' is wrong. That `something' is generally one of four things.

The first is that we are simply in the wrong place because we did not find all of the appropriate evidence. In that case, we need to redouble our efforts to look for more and better evidence, and reanalyze our solution. If, however, we still end up with what appears to be a contrary boundary location, we should consider the next three scenarios.

The second possibility is that we are in the wrong place because--lacking good, solid, conclusive evidence--we concocted a purely mathematical solution based on our interpretation of the evidence. This is what some call mathematical "deed-staking." Such solutions are inevitably the result of one or more relatively arbitrary decisions. That's fine; it's what we surveyors do: form an opinion based on our interpretation of what we often know is imperfect and incomplete evidence. But when that interpretation and opinion results in a solution that is going to disturb what may be established rights, we should rethink the wisdom of continuing with it. Cooley addressed this, saying,

[I]t is known that surveyors sometimes ... disregard all evidences of occupation and claim of title, and plunge whole neighborhoods into quarrels and litigation by assuming to establish corners at points with which the previous occupation cannot harmonize.

The third possibility when a line or corner falls contrary to a line of possession or occupation (usually, but not always, a fence) is that one of the doctrines of unwritten title may have acted to move ownership from the written title line over to the fence. Adverse possession, acquiescence (called by a different name in some states), parol agreement, estoppel or practical location can operate to move an ownership line based on the actions of one or both of the owners.

Of course, surveyors do not have the legal authority to make boundary determinations based on unwritten rights, but they need to be well-versed enough in each of the doctrines to recognize the possibility-- particularly when the respective owners have been peaceably occupying to the line of occupation. In this situation, as with the others, the surveyor has to consider alternatives to simply setting the corners, which will likely set the neighbors on the painful and expensive path to litigation. As Cooley said,

[The surveyor] would do mischief if he were to attempt to establish monuments which he knew would tend to disturb settled rights...

The last possibility--one that is not entirely unrelated to the third--is that the fence does not, in the surveyor's opinion, seem to fit the criteria for one of the doctrines of unwritten title, yet the owners are happy with it.

So, based on one of those scenarios, we have temporarily suspended our work. What alternatives should we now investigate? And what can we do without violating our state's standards of practice or practicing law? Quite a lot ... as we will find out next time.

Gary Kent is Director, Integrated Services at The Schneider Corporation in Indianapolis. He is past-president of ACSM and chairs the ALTA/ACSM Committee for NSPS and the Liaison Committee for ALTA. He is on the Indiana Board of Registration and lectures both locally and nationally.

A 68Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

< Prev   Next >

Marc Cheves, PS 
Editorial: A Great Year to be a Surveyor
Some magazines have what are called "theme" issues. That is, most of the content is focused on one particular subject. In my 22+ years of survey magazine publishing, my philosophy has always been to have a little bit of everything in each issue, thereby eliminating the possibility that ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Case Examinations: Halverson v. Deerwood Village
Whew! We really beat the snot out of Bryant v. Blevins and practical locations. Well this month we're back on new case that hit the Minnesota Supreme Court's docket in 1982. We've got the familiar gymnastics of jurisprudence featuring an extraordinary array of flying rope stretchers ...
Read the Article
Michel Philips 
Extreme Environment Surveying
A Franco-Chilean team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 rugged handheld for marine cave surveying, gathering data to classify the inaccessible northern half of Madre de Dios for UNESCO World Heritage. The team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 ....
Read the Article
Erik Dahlberg 
The Original Green Engineers
Sometimes, it's best just to leave things as you found them. That's the lesson shared by Dr. Richard Miksad and his students at the University of Virginia. As a result of studies covering nearly a decade, Miksad's teams have developed detailed ....
Read the Article
Dave Lindell, PS 
Test Yourself 49: No Dimensions
In square A-C-D-B with side S, C-E is tangent to the semicircle Q1 with diameter B-D. Q2 is the inscribed circle of A-C-E. The tangent to Q1 and Q2 meets the sides of the square at F and H and intersects C-E at t G. Q3 is the inscribed circle of C-G-H. What is the ratio of the radii of circles ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
Discovery on Grizzly Peak
When First Lieutenant Montgomery M. Macomb arrived in Carson City, Nevada, from Washington D.C., on July 28, 1878, his assigned survey crew from the 4th Artillery was waiting and ready for the new field season. At age 25, Macomb was the leader ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Fighting City Hall Over Land
Once upon a time (1989 to be exact) in a place not so far away from where I live, a man (Francis Galdo) bought a home across the street from a vacant parcel owned by the City of Philadelphia. That parcel, along with others, had been acquired by condemnation back in 1974 subsequent to a 1956 ....
Read the Article
Patrick C. Garner, PS 
Book Review: Boundary Retracement: Processes and Procedures
When I was in my mid-twenties and learning the honorable profession of land surveying, I was lucky to be guided by a mentor who would grab a book off his office shelf and say, "Every surveyor should have a copy of this!" The first example he waved at me was Davis, Foote and Kelly's Surveying ....
Read the Article


Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
contact Amerisurv


SXblue Announces
Premier Receiver

press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content


News Feeds

Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.


Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 



The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
7820B Wormans Mill Road, #236
Frederick MD 21701
301-695-1538 - fax