About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents
 
advertisement


Subscriptions
Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
     RTN
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By


Product Reviews
Partner Sites

machinecontrolonline 


lbszone.com

GISuser.com

GeoJobs.biz

GeoLearn

 

Spatial Media LLC properties

Associates

ASPRS

newsnow 

Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

Vantage Point: Why Your Bid Failed Print E-mail
Written by Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM   
Saturday, 04 January 2014

A 661Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

Recently I've been part of two different evaluation teams to hire contractors for two different kinds of work related to recovery from Superstorm Sandy. In each instance I had to rate applicants on a form requiring evaluation of various aspects of technical experience and abilities. And each time I was torn when I knew more about the applicants (either positive or negative) that didn't appear in the responses to Requests for Qualifications (RFQ).

So today I want to help you nail that next job or at least get on the list for work by addressing some of the problems I have seen over the years that have either totally eliminated firms from consideration or simply depressed their ratings beyond salvation. Let's start with the qualifications side of it, the RFQ that allows you to progress beyond Square One to have a shot at some very good job opportunities.

Number One: Read the Request for Proposal. Yes, it's boring, but read ALL of it. Then create a checklist of what the request asks for. Add any items that are clearly lacking from the RFQ but would help make your response stronger and crystal clear, and thus possibly stand out from the competition. But don't go overboard and add irrelevant information that busy evaluators will consider a waste of their time. While it is important to add information about certified hydrographic surveyors for an RFQ relating to water boundaries that only asked how many licensed surveyors are on staff, the number of structural engineers in the firm is extraneous.

Number Two: Address every single item on that checklist, even to say if the item is not applicable. Omitting any response can be interpreted in many ways unimagined by the one omitting the response. Does it mean the responder doesn't care to address a sticky topic? Does it mean lack of attention to detail? In many instances leaving out any kind of answer will automatically put your paperwork in a pile of "non-responsive" applicants from which you will never be removed--at least not for this round of projects. In some instances an explanation of why the item is not applicable shows you understand the project needs better than those who compiled the RFQ.

Number Three: When sample work is requested, just do it. Don't assume the organization or agency is so familiar with your work that this step is not necessary. Failing to do so will either immediately categorize you as non-responsive, or at the very least eliminate so many points from your technical qualifications score that you will never get on the short list. And provide something related and relevant. If it is an RFQ for boundary work relating to conveyance, sending bridge construction drawings will not impress the evaluation team no matter how detailed and beautifully drawn they may be.

Number Four: Supply responses and sample documents in the format requested. If the materials are sent in a format other than what was requested, the evaluating team may not have the time (or ability) to convert them to something that all team members will be able to access. This is especially true for nonprofits. Aside from implying a lack of attention to details, I've heard some evaluators term this approach "arrogant", as though such applicants expect the world to bend to their own preferences.

Number Five: Supply the number of responses and sample documents requested. Don't assume someone at the other end with have the time and ability to make the missing copies for you so that everyone on the evaluation team with have an opportunity to examine these stellar examples of your expertise.

Number Six: Provide meaningful qualifications of those who are named as part of the project team. Being president of a professional society by itself is not enough without some description of technical background and expertise. It's great supporting information to show community and professional commitment and perhaps organizational ability, but it doesn't say you can do the work involved in this particular contract.

Number Seven: When asked for experience on similar projects, provide more than the name of the project. The world at large may not be familiar with it. Provide at least a sentence or two describing what the project entailed in terms of type of surveying or other particular expertise required. It can be helpful to include information about the size of the project, its specific location, utilization of particular expertise, and difficult aspects of the sample project with a description of how these were addressed--especially if you were able to surmount these obstacles on time and under budget. Examples of teamwork and communication to resolve tough situations can be impressive. Provide a reference for each project noted, with a means of contacting that individual (phone, email).

Number Eight: Make sure your readers, some of whom may be non-technical, can understand your responses. Don't expect your readers to understand some of the jargon and abbreviations you use on a daily basis. The first time you want to use an abbreviation, make sure you spell out the words first and then parenthetically add the abbreviation.

Number Nine: Use good English! Eliminate extraneous commas, break down run-on sentences into discrete thoughts, and focus on answering each question separately.

Number Ten: Proofread, proofread, proofread! How impressive is a response signed by the firm's "Presdient" (typed in bold capital letters, no less)?

This is, of course, just a general outline of how to get into the pool for qualifications-based selection, and there are many other ways to blow your chances that I haven't addressed. Once you've made the list of qualified contractors, a new set of opportunities await both to succeed brilliantly and to fail miserably, with the latter often related to some of the top ten faux pas listed here. Once having made it past the RFQ into the Request for Proposals (RFP) stage, there is much more opportunity for creativity and flexibility in describing your proposed approach to advertised projects, especially if you can suggest approaches that will save time and money. But again, everything must be spelled out clearly enough that a general audience can understand what it is you are proposing to do.

Wendy Lathrop is licensed as a Professional Land Surveyor in NJ, PA, DE, and MD, and has been involved since 1974 in surveying projects ranging from construction to boundary to environmental land use disputes. She is a Professional Planner in NJ, and a Certified Floodplain Manager through ASFPM.

A 661Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

 
< Prev   Next >

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Editorial 
Thought Leader: Land is Too Important to Be Left to Land Specialists
A while back I was searching the Internet for an old treatise on land titles. A Google query yielded a book published in 1914. The author was Charles Claudius Kagey and the book was titled "Land Survey and Land Titles, a book for boys and girls, a reference volume for property owners, a text ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Wacker vs. Price - Irony in Sevenfold
This month's case takes us to Phoenix, Arizona in 1950. The Arizona Supreme Court went all guns-a-blazin' in Wacker vs. Price (216 P.2d 707 (Ariz. 1950)). Maybe it's just me, but I'm sensing plenty of irony and have taken license to point it out along the way. I like what the Court did with this case ....
Read the Article
Allen E. Cheves 
Around the Bend - A Visit to Carlson Software
The Ohio River is one of America's greatest, running near 1,000 miles between Pittsburgh and the Mighty Mississippi. Much of the coal and other products that fueled our nation's industrial expansion flowed between the shores of this maritime ....
Read the Article
Lee Lovell, PS 
Surveying & Mapping Economics Part 3 - Customers & Services
This article continues an inquiry into the economic conditions of the Surveying and Mapping industry (NAICS 541370) using data from the U.S. Census Bureau. This time we will look at customers and services. The data comes from the Economic Census conducted every 5 years on American ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
True Elevation: Black Elk Peak
Black Elk Peak, located in the Black Hills region of South Dakota, is the state's highest natural point. It is frequently referred to as the highest summit in the United States east of the Rocky Mountains. Two other peaks, Guadalupe Peak in Texas and ....
Read the Article
Larry Trojak 
Bringing The Goods - Mobile Scanning an Integral Component
When Jim Smith, Jerrad Burns and Charlie Patton left the Memphis division of a major construction company in 2015, they took with them the knowledge of how to get even the most complex jobs done and what equipment could best serve them in making that happen. So when they joined West ....
Read the Article
 
Lee Lovell, PS 
Test Yourself 41: Integers, Integers, and Integers
ABF is a 5:12:13 triangle, ACF is a 48:55:73 triangle, ADF is a 3:4:5 triangle, and AEF is a 7:24:25 triangle, all with integer sides and inscribed in a semi-circle. What are the lengths of BC, CD, and DE? ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Sunset or Sunrise?
While we often think of legislated government programs as static, they do change over time. Such evolution and opportunity for transformation are part of the dialogue in reauthorizing these programs. Every so many years there is a sunset on each government program, and this September is the ....
Read the Article
 

deliciousrssnewsletterlinkedinfacebooktwitter

Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
please
contact Amerisurv


Google
 
AMERISURV TOP NEWS

Laser Scanning
the Titanic

GOT NEWS? Send To
press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content

Sponsor


News Feeds

 
Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps
Careers

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.

 

Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 

twitter

 




The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
905 W 7th St #331
Frederick MD 21701
301-620-0784
301-695-1538 - fax