About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents

Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By

Product Reviews
Partner Sites







Spatial Media LLC properties




Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

Angle Points: Rules of Research and Evidence Evaluation for Conducting a Boundary Survey Print E-mail
Written by Michael J. Pallamary, PS   
Friday, 23 August 2013

A 80Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

In a society consumed by modern technology, computers, electronic map making and satellites, all too often, the basic art of boundary line determination is too frequently overlooked. Absent any guidelines or continuing education, many satellite surveyors rely on word of mouth as to what they are supposed to do. In my years as a Standard of Care and Standard of Practice expert before the courts, the one thing that I find striking is the inconsistency between how surveyors perform their work and their abysmal lack of documentation. I therefore submit for consideration an overview of the steps I believe are required to conduct a property survey. If the reader finds this procedure acceptable, it is a good idea to utilize these steps when performing boundary line work. This outline, or a variation of same, makes for a good procedural guideline for field crews to rely on. Unquestionably, any outline is better than none, particularly if you find yourself being sued. Someone will be asking these questions.

In conducting a boundary survey, one of the most important aspects of determining a property line is the acquisition and analysis of evidence. Failure to perform this work is the most common cause of errors in relocating boundaries and oftentimes leads to boundary disputes. Any relevant information such as title reports, unrecorded documents, and communications with neighbors in the possession of the client should be supplied to the surveyor and should be specified in all written contracts. The following steps should be taken when conducting a boundary line survey.

Examination of Written Evidence
Public Records Research: The search of public records shall be sufficient in breadth and depth to identify with reasonable certainty the described location of the client's boundaries, any gaps and/ or overlaps with the adjoiners' described boundaries, apparent errors in the written descriptions of client's boundaries, perceived or evident rights associated with the property, restrictions upon the use of the property pursuant to any recorded deed, and the intent of the conveyance.

The search of public records should be extended to all known repositories including those documents recorded in the Office of the County Recorder and the Office of the County Surveyor/ Engineer which should include, but not limited to Subdivision Maps, Parcel Maps, Records of Survey, Corner Records, Right of Way Plans, Miscellaneous Maps, and Private Surveys. If working in an incorporated city, City Surveyor and City Engineer's offices should be researched and should include the acquisition and review of City Engineer/Surveyor field notes, field books, right-of way maps and miscellaneous surveys. If the survey is adjacent to a state or county highway, research should include State highway right-of- way maps, monumentation maps, control maps and tie notes. If the site is near a flood control channel, or water district, district right-of-way maps and survey notes shall be reviewed. When resurveying sectionized lands, research should include Township Plats, Rancho Maps and government field notes for Public Land Surveys on file with the County and Bureau of Land Management. Utility companies and railroad right of way maps should also be reviewed when working near or adjacent to any utility lines. Witnesses who have knowledge of the location of missing corners should also be considered whenever possible.

If no monuments are called for in a deed or if there are questions regarding seniority, a chain of title maybe necessary to determine the time frame the parcel was created. After determining the time of parcel creation it will help narrow the search of private archives to surveyors who may have records from that era.

Private Records Research: The search should also be extended to include privately held survey notes as evidenced by found monumentation or as may be referred to on recorded maps and surveys. Private restrictions and agreements shall also be considered. The search of private records should ultimately be extended to any and all information indirectly indicated or implied in public and private records, both professional opinion and personal knowledge, that may aid in any way in the correct location of boundaries, and thereupon, explicitly or implicitly become part of the public record. If a public records research identifies a private survey, it should be obtained and reviewed.

Field Procedures and Evaluation of Field Evidence
Prior to commencing work, it is advisable to contact neighbors and adjacent property owners: When working in sectionized areas or rural areas, it is a good idea to send written correspondence to adjoiners to inform them that you will be working in their area. If you are surveying an aliquot portion of a section, in many instances, you will need to breakdown the entire section.

In this introductory letter, it is a good idea to explain what you are doing and where you will be working. You should also inquire about any corners or surveys as the adjacent owner(s) may be in possession of an unrecorded survey or know the location of existing or previously existent monuments. This can accomplish numerous things. First and foremost, if there is more available evidence, you will obtain it so that you can consider it. Second, in the event a dispute arises and if one of the neighbors were to produce a conflicting survey or challenge your work at a later date, they may be estopped from producing the document if you can demonstrate that you requested this information and you sought their input early on. Last, but not least, from a business perspective, they may want you to survey their property if you are already subdividing the section. It may be prudent to inquire in your introductory letter if they are interested in having their land surveyed. There is a definite economy in surveying several parcels in the same section.

In the event you obtain information from the neighbor(s) and it is valuable information, you may be obligated to use it. In the very least, you need to analyze it. In the event the neighbor(s) are aware of the previous location of any corners, you can replace it/them using parol testimony as generally provided for under existing laws. In California, the Land Surveyors Act under the Business and Professions Code provides:

8760. Every licensed land surveyor or registered civil engineer may administer and certify oaths:
When it becomes necessary to take testimony for the identification or establishment of old, lost or obliterated corners.
When a corner or monument is found in a perishable condition, and it appears desirable that evidence concerning it be perpetuated.

Physical Evidence: The survey should commence with a reconnaissance and location of Called-for Monuments. Sufficient field investigation shall be conducted to establish the existence and the condition of monumentation called for in the written record. Once located, any discrepancies in the location of the physical evidence must be compared to the written evidence and any differences between occupation lines and record boundaries and any problematic use of land indicated by the record evidence shall be noted and analyzed.

Due care shall be taken in the unearthing of called-for physical evidence to preserve it in place and in good condition. Historic or questionable monuments shall be properly identified and shall include detailed information including the type and size of the monument including any and all markings. Uncalled for or "Non-record Monuments" (monuments other than those called for in the public record) shall be verified by their correlation to found and accepted record monuments, witness monuments, record measurements, accepted lines of occupation or lines of possession and parol evidence.

Any irregular or undocumented monument should be photographed and identified. If necessary, such as in the consideration or acceptance of public land corners, consider obtaining declarations from the members of the survey crew. The credibility and acceptance of survey monuments should be based in part on their apparent age, their use and acceptance along with the prevalent practice in a given area. When in doubt, the Land Surveyor or crew chief should administer an oath from his assistants for the faithful performance of their duty. A record of the oath should be preserved as part of the field notes of the survey and a memorandum of them shall be made on the documentation of the survey such as a plat map or recorded survey map.

If you encounter lines of occupation that differ from deeded or monumented lines, you should take pictures of the staked line(s) and field measure the lines of occupation. If there is a major encroachment that the client is unaware of it has the potential to create tension between the neighbors, offer to provide a site survey plat depicting the relationship of the encroachment items in relationship to the boundary line.

Michael Pallamary, PS, is the author of several books and numerous articles. He is a frequent lecturer at conferences and seminars and he teaches real property to attorneys and other members of the legal profession. He has been in the surveying profession since 1971.

A 80Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

< Prev   Next >

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Marc Cheves, PS 
Editorial: A Great Year to be a Surveyor
Some magazines have what are called "theme" issues. That is, most of the content is focused on one particular subject. In my 22+ years of survey magazine publishing, my philosophy has always been to have a little bit of everything in each issue, thereby eliminating the possibility that ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Case Examinations: Halverson v. Deerwood Village
Whew! We really beat the snot out of Bryant v. Blevins and practical locations. Well this month we're back on new case that hit the Minnesota Supreme Court's docket in 1982. We've got the familiar gymnastics of jurisprudence featuring an extraordinary array of flying rope stretchers ...
Read the Article
Michel Philips 
Extreme Environment Surveying
A Franco-Chilean team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 rugged handheld for marine cave surveying, gathering data to classify the inaccessible northern half of Madre de Dios for UNESCO World Heritage. The team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 ....
Read the Article
Erik Dahlberg 
The Original Green Engineers
Sometimes, it's best just to leave things as you found them. That's the lesson shared by Dr. Richard Miksad and his students at the University of Virginia. As a result of studies covering nearly a decade, Miksad's teams have developed detailed ....
Read the Article
Dave Lindell, PS 
Test Yourself 49: No Dimensions
In square A-C-D-B with side S, C-E is tangent to the semicircle Q1 with diameter B-D. Q2 is the inscribed circle of A-C-E. The tangent to Q1 and Q2 meets the sides of the square at F and H and intersects C-E at t G. Q3 is the inscribed circle of C-G-H. What is the ratio of the radii of circles ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
Discovery on Grizzly Peak
When First Lieutenant Montgomery M. Macomb arrived in Carson City, Nevada, from Washington D.C., on July 28, 1878, his assigned survey crew from the 4th Artillery was waiting and ready for the new field season. At age 25, Macomb was the leader ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Fighting City Hall Over Land
Once upon a time (1989 to be exact) in a place not so far away from where I live, a man (Francis Galdo) bought a home across the street from a vacant parcel owned by the City of Philadelphia. That parcel, along with others, had been acquired by condemnation back in 1974 subsequent to a 1956 ....
Read the Article
Patrick C. Garner, PS 
Book Review: Boundary Retracement: Processes and Procedures
When I was in my mid-twenties and learning the honorable profession of land surveying, I was lucky to be guided by a mentor who would grab a book off his office shelf and say, "Every surveyor should have a copy of this!" The first example he waved at me was Davis, Foote and Kelly's Surveying ....
Read the Article


Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
contact Amerisurv


Javad Intros
Total Solution

press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content


News Feeds

Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.


Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 



The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
7820B Wormans Mill Road, #236
Frederick MD 21701
301-695-1538 - fax