About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents

Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By

Product Reviews
Partner Sites







Spatial Media LLC properties




Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

Angle Points: How the Profession has Damaged Continuing Education Print E-mail
Written by Michael J. Pallamary, PS   
Friday, 24 May 2013

A 299Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

Ever and anon, surveyors are constantly arguing about continuing education and the requirement for a degree before sitting for a license to practice the venerable art of land surveying. For reasons I have yet to comprehend, many surveyors oppose the pursuit of enhanced education and I have concluded it is either out of ignorance or apathy. My money's on apathy as I can't believe there are so many ignorant surveyors out there.

In defense of my position, it is a bit depressing to realize that I represent the standard profile for today's land surveyor--I am a white male, 59 years of age. Where is the new blood and why aren't more people qualified to become land surveyors? What did my generation do differently to produce so many land surveyors, ones that have remained in the profession? Put another way, what did subsequent generations of surveyors not do? Irrespective of what may or may not have happened, if we are to survive, we must consider what the next generation of surveyors needs to do.

Sadly, most of today's applicants for licensure are simply unqualified. Sure they do a great job at measuring but they are pretty lousy surveyors. I admit they can find a lot of shiny things and sometimes they can figure out where it is and how high it is but do they know what it means? Do they understand the rules of evidence? What is a monument and how does it fit in the grand cadastre? Do these measuring people know how to read a deed or prepare a map? Do they recognize signs of adverse possession, prescriptive easements, unwritten rights or a boundary agreement? Are they able to communicate effectively?

Here's where I fall into the "when I was your age" thing. When I was younger I was immersed in continuing education on a daily basis. I learned how to survey from some very talented individuals while on the job. A survey crew was typically composed of three people with a definite chain of command and qualifications. There was a rodman, a chainman and a crew chief and everyone took pride in their work; everyone had a definite set of responsibilities. Today, there is one person in the field and that person is measuring something and recording computer compiled measurements of things with a series of buttons and everything is stored on a data collector. There are no sketches, no notes, no nothing. No one is out there teaching them anything while basic economics prohibits the responsible charge surveyor to be in the field. How much can you learn from a circuit board and a satellite?

Several years ago when I interviewed a candidate for a crew chief position, I took him with me in rugged terrain where I had him run a chain and plum bob traverse with me, through a topographically diverse, heavily wooded site. I informed him that if we got a 1/20,000 closure, I would hire him. Mind you we had access to electronic equipment but I left it at the office. I wanted to see if he could survey. He passed and today, he is a partner in a large west coast surveying firm and he is a very competent surveyor.

When I began my career in New England, I spent a lot of time working in subzero weather in Maine and New Hampshire while in the summer, temperatures could exceed one-hundred degrees. I was taught how to pull a chain and correct for sag, temperature, and slope while still attaining a 1/20,000 closure. I was also taught how to maintain our field equipment and make calculations and adjustments in the field without electronic calculators. I understood what a measurement meant and what it took to measure accurately. Indeed, such a skill was one of the main attributes of a good surveyor; the ability to precisely locate things. With all due respect for people who measure today, what skills does it take to push a button and cough up a cupful of coordinates? My ten-year old granddaughter can run GPS and she can get better closures today than I ever dreamed of.

We also learned the seemingly lost art of evidence examination. We learned not only how to look for monuments, but we also learned what to look for. How many times have I seen modern measuring people produce a thumb drive full of coordinates, replete with their short abbreviated identification comments, for a "FD 3/4PDSK LS5432" and no indication as to what methods were used to locate it? When I ask for an explanation as to what control was used, such as was it a side shot, was there an adjustment for elevation, is it part of an accepted control scheme, they look at me with glazed eyes. "What don't you understand, Mike? Here are the coordinates!" ("Idiot" under their breath)

Several years ago I worked with a firm on a survey in some rugged mountainous terrain. We were retracing some old government survey monuments and I had a lot of preexisting state plane coordinate values so I had some expectation as to the values I should have been getting. When we returned to the office to do some post-processing of the data (not an onsite evaluation like we used to do) the distances were off by several feet across a half mile.

I began to audit the data and I started asking a lot of questions and I got the same "Idiot" under-the-breath stares. "What don't you understand Mike. Here are the coordinates!" I then posed a series of fundamental questions in an effort to figure out what happened and why their measurements were disagreeing with everyone else that had been through this area. My in-the-field, continuing education had taught me to look for patterns and I quickly figured out what was going on. Nonetheless, I asked about adjusting for relative elevation as we were in the 4,000 foot range. I asked about grid coordinates versus ground coordinates and scale factors. Throughout, the measuring people looked at me as if I was dense. After convincing them that I might have a clue about what I was talking about, I explained to them the principles of geodesy and spherical trigonometry. I explained to them that a measurement taken at 4,000 feet above sea level was not going to produce the same value as one at sea level and I also explained the principles behind scale factors and how a Transverse Mercator projection is created. It took a while before it started to make sense to them. My real challenge involved convincing them that although their coordinates were quite impressive, they weren't measuring the same things and just like making an adjustment for temperature in the old days, they needed to make an adjustment. They were flabbergasted. Why wasn't I impressed with anything measured to the nearest ten thousandth of a foot and why couldn't they use them? After all, the numbers came out of a computer.

I asked to see the manual for their equipment and they weren't sure where it was located. "The manual?" they asked. I queried them about the variable settings and were the values being displayed as ground or grid. Did they have to adjust for elevations and did they have a barometer or an idea how high they were above the grid or mean sea level? Their reply was, "Heck, it's the way we always measure things." The more I probed, the more I learned what I already deduced. Most of their work was done along the ocean near sea level and only over small areas. They had never measured land over such vast distances and so high above sea level. It turns out they were always measuring at ground and never bothered to make any adjustments. Because they were always pretty close (while working at sea level), they thought they were always doing things correctly. Yeah, let's go with that.

As noted above and years ago, every day in the field with an experienced chain person and a seasoned crew chief was a day of continuing education. We always learned something and we knew how to measure and use our equipment. After all, that is how surveying evolved and that is why so much weight has historically been placed on the apprentice method of education. There was always someone in the field to teach you how to survey and to measure and you knew how to look for monuments and what to look for and you learned the weight of evidence. We dug holes in the ground and looked for old stakes.

Sadly, as soon as today's measuring person learns how to push a button, he/she is turned loose to run around measuring stuff, all without any real training or education. We call them "surveyors" and if a "licensed" land surveyor is involved in this process, he/she can be found at a desk drafting things on a computer screen to figure out where someone's boundary line is located. And of course, they must be right. After all, the line was measured to the nearest thousandth of a foot. "Idiot" under-the-breath.

Michael Pallamary, PS, is the author of several books and numerous articles. He is a frequent lecturer at conferences and seminars and he teaches real property to attorneys and other members of the legal profession. He has been in the surveying profession since 1971.

A 299Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

< Prev

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Thought Leader: Land is Too Important to Be Left to Land Specialists
A while back I was searching the Internet for an old treatise on land titles. A Google query yielded a book published in 1914. The author was Charles Claudius Kagey and the book was titled "Land Survey and Land Titles, a book for boys and girls, a reference volume for property owners, a text ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Wacker vs. Price - Irony in Sevenfold
This month's case takes us to Phoenix, Arizona in 1950. The Arizona Supreme Court went all guns-a-blazin' in Wacker vs. Price (216 P.2d 707 (Ariz. 1950)). Maybe it's just me, but I'm sensing plenty of irony and have taken license to point it out along the way. I like what the Court did with this case ....
Read the Article
Allen E. Cheves 
Around the Bend - A Visit to Carlson Software
The Ohio River is one of America's greatest, running near 1,000 miles between Pittsburgh and the Mighty Mississippi. Much of the coal and other products that fueled our nation's industrial expansion flowed between the shores of this maritime ....
Read the Article
Lee Lovell, PS 
Surveying & Mapping Economics Part 3 - Customers & Services
This article continues an inquiry into the economic conditions of the Surveying and Mapping industry (NAICS 541370) using data from the U.S. Census Bureau. This time we will look at customers and services. The data comes from the Economic Census conducted every 5 years on American ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
True Elevation: Black Elk Peak
Black Elk Peak, located in the Black Hills region of South Dakota, is the state's highest natural point. It is frequently referred to as the highest summit in the United States east of the Rocky Mountains. Two other peaks, Guadalupe Peak in Texas and ....
Read the Article
Larry Trojak 
Bringing The Goods - Mobile Scanning an Integral Component
When Jim Smith, Jerrad Burns and Charlie Patton left the Memphis division of a major construction company in 2015, they took with them the knowledge of how to get even the most complex jobs done and what equipment could best serve them in making that happen. So when they joined West ....
Read the Article
Lee Lovell, PS 
Test Yourself 41: Integers, Integers, and Integers
ABF is a 5:12:13 triangle, ACF is a 48:55:73 triangle, ADF is a 3:4:5 triangle, and AEF is a 7:24:25 triangle, all with integer sides and inscribed in a semi-circle. What are the lengths of BC, CD, and DE? ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Sunset or Sunrise?
While we often think of legislated government programs as static, they do change over time. Such evolution and opportunity for transformation are part of the dialogue in reauthorizing these programs. Every so many years there is a sunset on each government program, and this September is the ....
Read the Article


Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
contact Amerisurv


JAVAD Intros
Spoofer Buster

press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content


News Feeds

Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.


Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 



The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
905 W 7th St #331
Frederick MD 21701
301-695-1538 - fax