About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents
 
advertisement


Subscriptions
Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
     RTN
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By


Product Reviews
Partner Sites

machinecontrolonline 


lbszone.com

GISuser.com

GeoJobs.biz

GeoLearn

 

Spatial Media LLC properties

Associates

ASPRS

newsnow 

Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

Angle Points: The $15,000 Question Print E-mail
Written by Michael J. Pallamary, PS   
Saturday, 20 April 2013

A 261Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

The fax arrived at my office on one of those fine, sunny afternoons, one of those days you get up early just to stretch your legs and feel the warmth of the sun. It read: "Finally, it's over!!!!! The Court entered Judgment last Friday...!!!!! I'm faxing it to you--of particular interest to you should be that paragraph re: your two surveys being recognized as the surveys setting the property line. (Can you believe she still says she doesn't know where the property line is located............)"

My client was referring to two boundary line surveys I performed on a property located in Point Loma, a prominent peninsula that juts out into the Pacific Ocean where homes enjoy spectacular views of downtown San Diego, the Coronado Bay Bridge and San Diego Harbor.

My initial survey was performed on behalf of a bank in connection with a foreclosure and sale. The second survey was in response to a boundary dispute between neighbors, one of the more foolish ones I have been involved with, arising because of some boorish behavior by my client's neighbor, and involving the tossing of trash and debris against my client's house and in their yard. The second survey was pretty straight forward as I recovered sufficient control from the first survey to reset the disputed line.

As noted by my excited client, both surveys, one done in 1981 and the other in 1995 were deemed correct, precise, and accurate. The court added:

For the purpose of driveway location, construction of any fence or wall and for all other purposes, the property boundary between the Plaintiff and Defendant's property shall be the line as set forth in the 1981 [Pallamary] survey of that line as more particularly set forth in the 1995 [Pallamary] survey..."

With regards to the associated activities, the judge also ordered:

[The defendants] are herby enjoined and restrained from entering onto the property of the other without the express written permission of the other, from annoying or harassing the other either verbally or otherwise, from placing any property, material, debris, trash, or other matter on the property of the other.

In the weeks and months leading up to this dispute, the neighbor hired a local surveyor to challenge my survey. I was not surprised at their selection as I had run into this individual several times before. He was one of those "exceptional" surveyors, devoted to leaving his "mark" upon the land, sort of like an unleashed dog marks your lawn.

Several years before, this "Master of Measurement" challenged another of my surveys performed in the Mission Beach section of San Diego, also in connection with a contested matter. In that case, he immodestly claimed his survey was far more accurate than mine because he used State Plane Coordinates and I did not. What a great opening line. After digesting his declaration of egotism, I wasted no time in demonstrating that his survey was in error by five feet because he had used the wrong starting point. But hey, he used State Plane Coordinates! Consequently, I renewed my membership in the Star Trek transporter decoder ring, post haste--with extra postage.

When my client's attorney deposed this measuring person, he claimed that his equipment, staff, and capabilities were far superior to mine, citing a lengthy number of reasons. For starters, I used a theodolite, some plumb bobs and a chain, at the time, pretty common surveying tools. Anxious for enlightenment, when we got to look at the measuring person's survey, neatly accompanied by his sworn deposition, he argued that my 16 year old survey was in error because I purportedly missed the trash strewn boundary line by a hundredth of a foot. It wasn't until I read the other measuring person's deposition and saw his detailed drawing, calling my monument out, that I realized this wasn't a joke. A hundredth!

Being otherwise sane and rational, my first reaction was to surrender the one hundredth of a foot to the other measuring person; I explained to my client's attorney that I was painfully embarrassed to be arguing over the width of a pencil tip. "You can't do that," said the attorney, informing me that I could not cede anything. He explained, in painful detail, how, in the eyes of the judge and a potential jury, that if I ceded the hundredth of a "pencil," that that would constitute acquiescence to a "superior" survey and that would call my entire survey into question. Moreover, seeing that I add issued a survey report and plat, I had to defend my work, regardless of how vacuous the challenge was. Indeed, if I caved in on the hundredth, that would constitute the admission of an error or, less than proper work. As Charles Dickens so eloquently wrote, "The law is a ass."

In spite of my protest, I had to submit my 1981 survey and my 1995 survey to intense scrutiny and assault. With regards to the detailed discussion by the measuring person about my "bad" corner, it was an iron pipe, centered with a surveyor's stamped disc, in the back yard of a residential property located on a slope, in a neighborhood where the streets and sidewalks were full of cracks and moving earth. I had to argue that over the span of twenty or thirty years, slight movements can occur and that the entire neighborhood, every yard and street and power pole was in a constant state of minor fluctuation.

As any sensible surveyor would conclude, given the fact that I had set the original pipe twenty years earlier using a chain, transit, and plumb bobs, making all the requisite adjustments for temperature, sag, and wind--in other words by real old fashioned land surveying, hitting the pipe within a hundredth was about as rewarding as it can get. I was delighted.

After we went round and round, and back and forth and up and down arguing over a hundredth, the court eventually arrived at its decision, much to the chagrin of the other measuring person; licensed to stamp letters and numbers on little brass discs. As part of the forensic analysis of the documents produced by the measuring person, a closer examination of his detailed map reveals that his block traverse did not close by five hundredths of a foot. Now if you want to play with the numbers, you could say that his work was in error five times as much as mine or, perhaps you could say, his work had 500 percent of the error my work did. No matter how you attempt to characterize his position, it is dreadful at best and did nothing to advance the public perception of land surveying.

Here's the punch line, pathetic as it can be. After all the debate and argument, my client had to expend an additional $15,000 in legal fees, expert witness fees and costs so that I could defend my survey, a debate promoted and promulgated and fueled by the gross incompetency and ego of the neighbor's measuring person. When one reads the transcript, you begin to understand what the problems were and why this occurred. In response to my client's attorney's examination of this measuring person, the attorney asked how the work was performed:

A: (Measuring Person) Well, we did a survey of the entire block in order to establish and determine the location of the property line.

Q: Now, did you find any discrepancies other than at this corner?

A:(Measuring Person) Oh, yeah. We found small discrepancies throughout. We found discrepancies at the property line in question. I think Mr. Pallamary had set some points out there that were to represent the line between Lots 9 and 10. We show him missing by a few hundredths of a foot here and there... We found it to be to the northwest of the property line by four hundredths of a foot, and we found it to be a hundredth of a foot off of the 15-foot offset line... as shown in our detailing on the rear property line.... At the rear of the lot we found a monument to the southeast of the true property corners. It's one-hundredth of a foot is what we measured its true position...

Upon further prodding by the attorney, who sought clarification as to the import of all this, he had one more question. Remember that the measuring person was before the court as an expert witness.
Q: Well, I won't pretend to understand that. I'm sure it's meaningful to a surveyor.
A:(Measuring Person) Yes.

In other words, he represented that an argument over one hundredth of a foot was "meaningful" and significant. After all, he (the measuring person) knew exactly where the "true property corner" was.

There's a lot to be learned from this incident at many levels. Perhaps the most significant lesson has to do with the concept of measurement and land surveying. Anyone can measure; it takes a professional land surveyor to determine a boundary line.

Michael Pallamary, PS, is the author of several books and numerous articles. He is a frequent lecturer at conferences and seminars and he teaches real property to attorneys and other members of the legal profession. He has been in the surveying profession since 1971.

A 261Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

 
< Prev   Next >

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Marc Cheves, PS 
Editorial: A Great Year to be a Surveyor
Some magazines have what are called "theme" issues. That is, most of the content is focused on one particular subject. In my 22+ years of survey magazine publishing, my philosophy has always been to have a little bit of everything in each issue, thereby eliminating the possibility that ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Case Examinations: Halverson v. Deerwood Village
Whew! We really beat the snot out of Bryant v. Blevins and practical locations. Well this month we're back on new case that hit the Minnesota Supreme Court's docket in 1982. We've got the familiar gymnastics of jurisprudence featuring an extraordinary array of flying rope stretchers ...
Read the Article
Michel Philips 
Extreme Environment Surveying
A Franco-Chilean team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 rugged handheld for marine cave surveying, gathering data to classify the inaccessible northern half of Madre de Dios for UNESCO World Heritage. The team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 ....
Read the Article
Erik Dahlberg 
The Original Green Engineers
Sometimes, it's best just to leave things as you found them. That's the lesson shared by Dr. Richard Miksad and his students at the University of Virginia. As a result of studies covering nearly a decade, Miksad's teams have developed detailed ....
Read the Article
Dave Lindell, PS 
Test Yourself 49: No Dimensions
In square A-C-D-B with side S, C-E is tangent to the semicircle Q1 with diameter B-D. Q2 is the inscribed circle of A-C-E. The tangent to Q1 and Q2 meets the sides of the square at F and H and intersects C-E at t G. Q3 is the inscribed circle of C-G-H. What is the ratio of the radii of circles ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
Discovery on Grizzly Peak
When First Lieutenant Montgomery M. Macomb arrived in Carson City, Nevada, from Washington D.C., on July 28, 1878, his assigned survey crew from the 4th Artillery was waiting and ready for the new field season. At age 25, Macomb was the leader ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Fighting City Hall Over Land
Once upon a time (1989 to be exact) in a place not so far away from where I live, a man (Francis Galdo) bought a home across the street from a vacant parcel owned by the City of Philadelphia. That parcel, along with others, had been acquired by condemnation back in 1974 subsequent to a 1956 ....
Read the Article
Patrick C. Garner, PS 
Book Review: Boundary Retracement: Processes and Procedures
When I was in my mid-twenties and learning the honorable profession of land surveying, I was lucky to be guided by a mentor who would grab a book off his office shelf and say, "Every surveyor should have a copy of this!" The first example he waved at me was Davis, Foote and Kelly's Surveying ....
Read the Article

deliciousrssnewsletterlinkedinfacebooktwitter

Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
please
contact Amerisurv


Google
 
AMERISURV TOP NEWS

Javad Intros
Total Solution

GOT NEWS? Send To
press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content

Sponsor


News Feeds

 
Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps
Careers

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.

 

Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 

twitter

 




The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
7820B Wormans Mill Road, #236
Frederick MD 21701
301-620-0784
301-695-1538 - fax