About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents

Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By

Product Reviews
Partner Sites







Spatial Media LLC properties




Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

FeedBack Print E-mail
Written by Letters to the Editor   
Saturday, 23 February 2013

A 53Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

Zoned Out
Wendy, Great article. I read it, without realizing that you are the author, by clicking on the URL provided this morning by the American Surveyor newsletter. Only when I got to the bottom of the article, did I find that it is you who had, once again, stimulated my interest.

I am happy to admit that I am very much pro when it comes to zoning and its related legislation "the official plan--mainly because of the consultative process that is required to put any of these items in place or to amend them.

Our group, the Surveyor General Branch, deals with land on First Nation Reserves, where planning seems to be an after thought or totally non-existent. I did not realize that there are major U.S. cities where zoning is not part of the legislation. Thanks for enlightening us.
Murray J. LeGris, O.L.S., C.L.S., O.L.I.P.
Senior Surveyor, Ontario Regional Office
Natural Resources Canada

Lathrop Responds
Thank you for writing--it's nice to know that the topics I choose interest others as well, and I also appreciate learning from letters received in response. I am not sure that planning is often part of the development process on reserved lands here in the US, either, but I would defer to others with more direct experience beyond my mere reading of a smattering of articles. --WL

Measurement is Dead, Long Live Measurement
I enjoyed Michael Pallamary's thought provoking article "Measurement is Dead, Long Live Measurement." [Editor's note: the article can be found at http://www.amerisurv.com/content/view/10759/153/]

That said, I have an alternate point of view regarding the status of measurement. While I agree with Mr. Pallamary in principle, in my opinion some of his statements are too generalized and work around the edges of the problem without dealing directly with the problem itself.

Well over twenty-years ago, the center of gravity began to shift in measurement technology from the mechanical act of making measurements to measurement analysis. One can cite the advent of electronic surveying systems and desktop least-squares as the shape of things to come. In my opinion, what distinguishes the technician from the professional is the professional's ability to analyze measurements, rather than purely making observations (measurements).

Like many, I can cite several instances that I have witnessed over the years of misapplied technology ranging from bad RTK calibrations, the improper use of least-squares/coordinate transformations, or using the wrong tool for the task. From my perspective, some have become too comfortable with the results from some of the more modern automated measurement systems.

Anecdotally, I can share one project that illustrates my point. Two years ago, I was involved in a vertical control survey in a relatively steep portion of Los Angeles County in support of a project along one of our transportation routes. We were required to re-run third-order leveling originally performed by a surveyor under contract to the State that was completed several years before. The leveling route contains a difference in elevation of over 1300 feet (400 m) over a distance of roughly 15 miles (25 km).

At the time, the original surveyor's leveling network misclosed when compared to the published NGS benchmarks by upwards of 0.6' (18 cm); his solution was to constrain both ends of his leveling network and simply "adjust out" any remaining misclosure. What we subsequently discovered was that the fiberglass leveling rods used by the original surveyor were systematically too short. After the proper scale correction was applied to the measurements, all the original surveyor's leveling observations agreed with the NAVD 88 benchmarks published by NGS to within 0.04' (12 mm), a very different result from the original 0.6' misclosure. Our results were also confirmed independently using GNSS methods completed at the same time as our re-leveling. Briefly, this became a control surveying version of "my chain versus the original surveyor's chain", or better put "the original surveyor's leveling rods versus NGS' leveling rods." Systematic scale errors in distance or height are identical regardless whether one analyzes geodetic leveling (correcting rod scale error) or boundary surveying (correcting a chain using proration).

It was a simple solution, but one that escaped the original surveyor because (my suspicion) his digital level and least squares told him so. Perhaps the original surveyor thought that since he was using state-of-the art equipment, his results could not possibly be wrong. The cold hard reality is that the original surveyor never went beyond what the black box told him to investigate why his leveling survey had such a high misclosure relative to stable first-order NAVD 88 benchmarks published by NGS. His measurement analysis was flawed but his measurements were correct because the scale error could have been corrected prior to using a least-squares solution. (Reference: Caltrans District 7 Survey Request SR 10-211).
Jay Satalich, PS
California Department of Transportation
District 7

A 53Kb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

< Prev   Next >

Marc Cheves, PS 
Editorial: A Great Year to be a Surveyor
Some magazines have what are called "theme" issues. That is, most of the content is focused on one particular subject. In my 22+ years of survey magazine publishing, my philosophy has always been to have a little bit of everything in each issue, thereby eliminating the possibility that ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Case Examinations: Halverson v. Deerwood Village
Whew! We really beat the snot out of Bryant v. Blevins and practical locations. Well this month we're back on new case that hit the Minnesota Supreme Court's docket in 1982. We've got the familiar gymnastics of jurisprudence featuring an extraordinary array of flying rope stretchers ...
Read the Article
Michel Philips 
Extreme Environment Surveying
A Franco-Chilean team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 rugged handheld for marine cave surveying, gathering data to classify the inaccessible northern half of Madre de Dios for UNESCO World Heritage. The team of cave divers used the Nautiz X8 ....
Read the Article
Erik Dahlberg 
The Original Green Engineers
Sometimes, it's best just to leave things as you found them. That's the lesson shared by Dr. Richard Miksad and his students at the University of Virginia. As a result of studies covering nearly a decade, Miksad's teams have developed detailed ....
Read the Article
Dave Lindell, PS 
Test Yourself 49: No Dimensions
In square A-C-D-B with side S, C-E is tangent to the semicircle Q1 with diameter B-D. Q2 is the inscribed circle of A-C-E. The tangent to Q1 and Q2 meets the sides of the square at F and H and intersects C-E at t G. Q3 is the inscribed circle of C-G-H. What is the ratio of the radii of circles ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
Discovery on Grizzly Peak
When First Lieutenant Montgomery M. Macomb arrived in Carson City, Nevada, from Washington D.C., on July 28, 1878, his assigned survey crew from the 4th Artillery was waiting and ready for the new field season. At age 25, Macomb was the leader ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Fighting City Hall Over Land
Once upon a time (1989 to be exact) in a place not so far away from where I live, a man (Francis Galdo) bought a home across the street from a vacant parcel owned by the City of Philadelphia. That parcel, along with others, had been acquired by condemnation back in 1974 subsequent to a 1956 ....
Read the Article
Patrick C. Garner, PS 
Book Review: Boundary Retracement: Processes and Procedures
When I was in my mid-twenties and learning the honorable profession of land surveying, I was lucky to be guided by a mentor who would grab a book off his office shelf and say, "Every surveyor should have a copy of this!" The first example he waved at me was Davis, Foote and Kelly's Surveying ....
Read the Article


Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
contact Amerisurv


SXblue Announces
Premier Receiver

press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content


News Feeds

Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.


Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 



The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
7820B Wormans Mill Road, #236
Frederick MD 21701
301-695-1538 - fax