About Amerisurv| Contact    
Magazine | Newsletter    
Flickr Photos | Advertise    
HomeNewsNewsletterAmerisurv DirectoryJobsStoreAuthorsHistoryArchivesBlogVideosEvents

Sponsored By

Software Reviews
Continuing Series
An RTN expert provides everything you need to know about network-corrected real-time GNSS observations.
Click Here to begin the series,
or view the Article PDF's Here
76-PageFlip Compilation
of the entire series
Test Yourself

Got Answers?
Test your knowledge with NCEES-level questions.
  Start HERE
Meet the Authors
Check out our fine lineup of writers. Each an expert in his or her field.
Wow Factor
Sponsored By

Product Reviews
Partner Sites







Spatial Media LLC properties




Home arrow Archives   The American Surveyor     

Vantage Point: Zoning: Taking Sides Print E-mail
Written by Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM   
Friday, 25 January 2013

A 2.989Mb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

Aside from the intrigue of what could possibly trigger million-dollar-plus awards, land use and zoning cases are interesting because of the variety of arguments presented for and against particular projects and developments, many of which can inform surveyors of possible scenarios we may face in our own careers. These cases tell us what kinds of protests we may face from the community and provide some insight as to various counters to those protests.

Sometimes the court opinions read like soap operas, sometimes like good guy-bad guy melodramas, but in every instance there is more than one version of the story. That's why they ended up in court in the first place, but sifting through the facts, or what is presented as being factual and may or may not be, is not for the faint of heart. By the time we read these opinions, "facts" have been determined in the lower courts so that the appellate, superior, and supreme courts (depending upon the jurisdiction's nomenclature) will address only the law, sending a case back to trial if factual questions remain.

One particular land use case in San Diego has just resulted in a record award to a Catholic school after years of chasing community support and city approval for improvements to its campus. After winding its way up and down the court system, on October 19, 2012 the jury in the remanded case decided that damages to the Academy of Our Lady of Peace had been so extensive as to be worth $1,111,662.00. What makes this remarkable is that it is the largest ever award based on Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA, 2000) arguments. RLUIPA is a federal law (42 USC §2000cc et seq., Protection of Religious Exercise in Land Use and by Institutionalized Persons) intended to prevent discrimination and to counteract common "not in our neighborhood" arguments that hinder proper operation for the named purposes. For surveyors, the case addresses that tricky balance between the responsibilities of local governments and the desires of their residents. But we should start at the beginning of the story.

The Academy of Our Lady of Peace (OLP) is now a 501(c)3 non-profit operating Catholic liberal arts high school for girls. OLP was established in 1882 and moved to what is currently known as the North Park area of San Diego in southern California in 1925, establishing its campus there in 1926. Over the years, OLP had adapted its buildings to be more appropriate for modern educational needs, but the last new building was erected in 1965.

Like any business, OLP recognized its need to upgrade and expand its facilities if it were to remain competitive, and developed a Modernization Plan to accomplish those goals. In particular it wanted state of the art science laboratories, an enhanced library and media center, additional classroom space, and off-street parking, specifically resulting in a new two-story classroom building and a parking garage. This sounds innocuous enough, except that the Modernization Plan included demolishing three residences owned by OLP that were not suitable for adaptive reuse. That became the rallying point for opposition from the North Park community surrounding OLP's campus.

OLP submitted its Modernization Plan to San Diego's Planning Commission in May of 2007 for review and approval. Its application noted unusual site constraints, including sleep slopes, restricted fire access, and historic, architecturally valuable buildings. It also submitted an architect's evaluation stating that its existing buildings did not meet current structural standards for the proposed reuse, including ceiling heights in classrooms, ventilation, load bearing capability, and compliance with disabled access requirements. A year-long review by the City's Planning Commission resulted in determination that OLP needed four use permits. OLP met with North Park residents several times to try to engage the community in revising its plans, resulting in the City's staff forwarding its unanimous recommendation for approval of the Modernization Plan to San Diego's City Council in September of 2008.

But then the story becomes complicated. The Urban Design/Project Review Subcommittee of the North Park Planning Committee (a community organization) loudly expressed concerns about parking and vehement opposition to demolition of the three houses, two of which it characterized as "locally significant based on their architectural features." The removal of these architecturally (not historically) significant structures would conflict with community plans to preserve architectural variety and the residential nature of Greater North Park.

Locals found a friend in one City Council member, who spearheaded the move to deny OLP necessary permits that would allow it to become a competitive educational facility in compliance with current codes. A split vote denied Planned Development and Site Development permits but granted Conditional Use and Neighborhood Development permits with terms and conditions, City Council offered no alternative solutions to OLP in its denial of permits beyond telling it to keep working on its plans.

And so the suits began. OLP alleged ten violations of state and federal constitutional rights relating to free exercise of religion, freedom of speech, equal protection and due process of law, claimed one RLUIPA violation, requested invalidation of City Council's decision, and sought to overturn penalties assessed against OLP by an Administrative Law Judge employed by the City who had found OLP in violation of its then current Conditional Use Permit. OLP also presented testimony regarding financial hardships that would be incurred by relocating the houses in contention and the infeasibility of converting them to educational uses--conversions that would destroy their residential nature in the process.

The four publicly reported court opinions (trial court reports are not so readily distributed) cover the period from April 2010 to August 2012. The first two deny OLP's requests for summary judgment.

The third opinion notes that the parties had not yet reached a settlement (a website maintained by OLP states that an agreement to settle was breached by City Council's failure to uphold the first of its required actions) so the suit will proceed. This court report illustrates common stalling and irritating tactics during discovery, the fact and information exchange process prior to trial. Most of the City's requests for documents were categorized as overbroad, irrelevant, vague, ambiguous, and in some instances were for materials it had supplied to OLP in the first place.

The fourth brief opinion refuses OLP's request to add to the record a summary of a full document already included.

All of this leads up to the October 2012 federal trial with the precedent-setting outcome. The $1.1 million award by a unanimous jury was based on increased cost of construction from March 2009 when City Council rescinded the Planning Commission's unanimous approval of the project until the start of this trial. Local government discrimination in violation of RLUIPA had kept OLP from gaining the same approvals as other public and private schools wishing to expand and rebuild throughout San Diego.

What does this mean? First and foremost, the details tell us that local politics can alter what should happen if going by the rules. I'm sure we can each come up with our own local examples. Elected officials are not immune to the pleas of their constituents. But if an applicant has run the obstacle course successfully, and the local government staff has approved a project as compliant, should politics now come into the picture? And if so, how far can that advocacy bend legal rules? It's not an easy question, because we have all been in situations where we would prefer either strict adherence or a little leeway. It's when bending results in breaking the rules that the trouble begins.

Note: The actual court case can be downloaded from http://www.amerisurv.com/docs/OLPvSD_Complaint.pdf

Wendy Lathrop is licensed as a Professional Land Surveyor in NJ, PA, DE, and MD, and has been involved since 1974 in surveying projects ranging from construction to boundary to environmental land use disputes. She is a Professional Planner in NJ, and a Certified Floodplain Manager through ASFPM.

A 2.989Mb PDF of this article as it appeared in the magazine—complete with images—is available by clicking HERE

< Prev   Next >

 American Surveyor Recent Articles
Thought Leader: Land is Too Important to Be Left to Land Specialists
A while back I was searching the Internet for an old treatise on land titles. A Google query yielded a book published in 1914. The author was Charles Claudius Kagey and the book was titled "Land Survey and Land Titles, a book for boys and girls, a reference volume for property owners, a text ....
Read the Article
Jason E. Foose, PS 
Decided Guidance: Wacker vs. Price - Irony in Sevenfold
This month's case takes us to Phoenix, Arizona in 1950. The Arizona Supreme Court went all guns-a-blazin' in Wacker vs. Price (216 P.2d 707 (Ariz. 1950)). Maybe it's just me, but I'm sensing plenty of irony and have taken license to point it out along the way. I like what the Court did with this case ....
Read the Article
Allen E. Cheves 
Around the Bend - A Visit to Carlson Software
The Ohio River is one of America's greatest, running near 1,000 miles between Pittsburgh and the Mighty Mississippi. Much of the coal and other products that fueled our nation's industrial expansion flowed between the shores of this maritime ....
Read the Article
Lee Lovell, PS 
Surveying & Mapping Economics Part 3 - Customers & Services
This article continues an inquiry into the economic conditions of the Surveying and Mapping industry (NAICS 541370) using data from the U.S. Census Bureau. This time we will look at customers and services. The data comes from the Economic Census conducted every 5 years on American ....
Read the Article
Jerry Penry, PS 
True Elevation: Black Elk Peak
Black Elk Peak, located in the Black Hills region of South Dakota, is the state's highest natural point. It is frequently referred to as the highest summit in the United States east of the Rocky Mountains. Two other peaks, Guadalupe Peak in Texas and ....
Read the Article
Larry Trojak 
Bringing The Goods - Mobile Scanning an Integral Component
When Jim Smith, Jerrad Burns and Charlie Patton left the Memphis division of a major construction company in 2015, they took with them the knowledge of how to get even the most complex jobs done and what equipment could best serve them in making that happen. So when they joined West ....
Read the Article
Lee Lovell, PS 
Test Yourself 41: Integers, Integers, and Integers
ABF is a 5:12:13 triangle, ACF is a 48:55:73 triangle, ADF is a 3:4:5 triangle, and AEF is a 7:24:25 triangle, all with integer sides and inscribed in a semi-circle. What are the lengths of BC, CD, and DE? ....
Read the Article
Wendy Lathrop, PS, CFM 
Vantage Point: Sunset or Sunrise?
While we often think of legislated government programs as static, they do change over time. Such evolution and opportunity for transformation are part of the dialogue in reauthorizing these programs. Every so many years there is a sunset on each government program, and this September is the ....
Read the Article


Amerisurv Exclusive Online-only Article ticker
Featured Amerisurv Events
List Your Event Here
contact Amerisurv


JAVAD Intros
Spoofer Buster

press [at] amerisurv.com
Online Internet Content


News Feeds

Subscribe to Amerisurv news & updates via RSS or get our Feedburn
xml feed

Need Help? See this RSS Tutorial

Historic Maps

post a job
Reach our audience of Professional land surveyors and Geo-Technology professionals with your GeoJobs career ad. Feel free to contact us if you need additional information.


Social Bookmarks

Amerisurv on Facebook 

Amerisurv LinkedIn Group 

Amerisurv Flickr Photos 

Amerisurv videos on YouTube 



The American Surveyor © All rights reserved / Privacy Statement
Spatial Media LLC
905 W 7th St #331
Frederick MD 21701
301-695-1538 - fax